Instapundit Glenn Reynolds: Your Due Process Right to Record the Cops!
Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit daylights as a law professor at the University of Tennessee. He's got a new paper out with John A. Steakley arguing that you don't just have a First Amendment right to record the police, you've got a due process right too. Here's the abstract:
There has been considerable discussion of citizens' First Amendment right to record the police. This essay, however, argues that independent of any First Amendment right, there is also a due process right to record the actions of law enforcement, and that this right applies even when the interaction takes place in private, and not in public places. This question of a due process right to record the police has not yet produced the degree of attention and litigation that public recording has, but the growth of inexpensive recording equipment and its inclusion in smart phones ensures that such attention and litigation are sure to be forthcoming.
Read/download the whole thing from the Washington University Law Review here.
Watch Reason.tv's The War on Cameras here:
And read 7 Rules for Recording Police now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
1th
2rd
3st
4nd
Thanks, Glenn. I've always thought the due process argument was as strong as the 1A argument. I hadn't thought of the "in-private" application.
How anyone could think that the gathering and preservation of potentially exculpatory evidence could be outlawed without raising due process concerns would be a mystery to me if I hadn't long ago given up on our Master Class (from legislators right down to the cops at the bottom of the Master Class food chain).
+ the interwebz
Glenn Reynolds? Isn't that the guy who called for genocide in North Korea a while back?
What a swell guy...
I'm amazed that he even had time to write something like this, considering how busy he's been making "Obama eating dog" jokes in the last couple of day.
/Jay
What can you expect from the Puppy Blender? He finally has some company in his campaign for acceptance of canine as cuisine.
Obama Ate Dog video.
I'm pretty sure he's pro-torture, too, so don't forget that one.
Well, you can't blame the guy when Obama says he ate dog.
Still repeating that "genocide" nonsense, Jay? Called you on it last year.
That's good alt-text by NG.
Very subtle humor. Less is more.
Never really thought about it liek that dude.
http://www.Planet-Anon.tk