Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Darling Companion and The Moth Diaries

Tired blood

Kurt Loder | 4.20.2012 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Darling Companion is a movie that Woody Allen might have made if he had (a) no gift for narrative charm, (b) no knack for tangy banter, and (c) no sense of humor. The cast features a couple of actors who are closely identified with Allen's films, and the characters, like so many in the Woodman's oeuvre, are career white people of the well-to-do variety. But would Allen have assembled these folks at a vacation home in the sun-blighted, fresh-air-infested Rocky Mountains? I think not. And would he have sent them stumbling around in the local woodlands for long stretches of screen time? Again, unlikely. And then there's the dog.

The dog is the hub around which the movie's shaggy plot revolves. He has been rescued from roadside homelessness by suburban matron Beth Winter (Diane Keaton, giving the film's peppiest performance) and her daughter Grace (Elisabeth Moss, of Mad Men). They name the mutt "Freeway" and take it home—where it receives a frosty reception from Beth's husband Joseph (Kevin Kline, an oddly wispy presence throughout). Joseph has been looking forward to an uncluttered life after Grace finds a man to marry and finally moves out of the house; a canine interloper is not part of his plan.

Soon we find ourselves wading into the rest of the cast. Joseph is a Denver medico who maintains a surgical practice with his nephew Bryan (blandly amiable Mark Duplass). Bryan is the son of Joseph's dithery sister Penny (Dianne Wiest), who has just found late-life love with a cheery demolition contractor named Russell (Richard Jenkins), who for his part dreams of opening a "real English pub" in his hometown of Omaha. Grace's wedding to a handsome veterinarian (Jay Ali) is the event that draws these characters together—along with the dog—at the Winters' mountain lodge in the leafy environs of Telluride. Here we also meet Joseph's groundskeeper, a young woman named Carmen (Ayelet Zurer), who is not only a Gypsy ("I am of the Romany people"), but a Gypsy psychic (an echo of the Julie Kavner character in Allen's Oedipus Wrecks, his chapter in the 1986 omnibus film New York Stories).

Now the plot—if we can attach that word to a story with no serious conflict among its uncomplicated characters—slips gently into gear. After Joseph loses the dog during a walk in the woods, the family splits up to mount a search. Joseph and Beth, whose marriage has grown stale, re-bond while traipsing through the forest. Russell, initially suspected by the family of hooking up with the wealthy Penny in order to finance his pub, is revealed to be a pretty nice guy. And Bryan naturally falls in love with Carmen, even though her dubious psychic abilities are proving useless in locating the lost mutt.

Only a dimwitted infant could be in any doubt about how this picture must end. Veteran filmmaker Lawrence Kasdan, directing his first movie in nine years, from a script he wrote with his wife Meg, is clearly a dog-lover, but he appears to have no feeling for comedy. He should have given the dog some lines. 

The Moth Diaries

Mary Harron's The Moth Diaries is like the Twilight films without the glitter, and without the silly brooding vampire boys. Great. The story is set in a girls' boarding school, and there's a heavy air of Sapphic attraction—which, alas, might have been more fun if fun were what Harron had in mind. Since she has resisted providing any of the cheap horror thrills that might have invigorated this tale, the movie finally does end up resembling the Twilight series in one crucial aspect—it's not in any way scary.

Sarah Bolger plays Rebecca, a student still haunted by her father's suicide some years earlier. She and her friends spend their evenings in cuddly girl talk, much of it devoted to wondering what sex will be like if they ever find a guy to have it with. Rebecca's best friend is a classmate named Lucie (Sarah Gadon), from whom she's inseparable. Then a new student arrives at the school, a girl named Ernessa (Lily Cole). With her raven hair, chalk-white skin, crimson lips, and shivery stare, Ernessa suggests a runaway from an interplanetary roadshow version of The Addams Family, but only Rebecca finds her odd.

Coincidentally, the girls' lit teacher, Mr. Davies (Scott Speedman), has just launched them on an exploration of the gothic novel—starting with Bram Stoker's Dracula, then moving on, counter-chronologically, to Sheridan Le Fanu's Carmilla, the lesbian-vampire classic. (The Rachel Klein novel on which this film is based is essentially a reworking of the Le Fanu story.) As Lucie begins falling under Ernessa's spell (we see them holding hands in assembly at one point), and various characters begin turning up dead, Rebecca starts drawing connections. But despite the fact that Ernessa never seems to eat, and walks around outside at night with bare feet, and is altogether witchy in every regard, the other girls remain oblivious. ("There has to be a rational explanation," one of them insists, with traditional genre idiocy.)

The movie shifts into heavily saturated colors for flashbacks to Rebecca's troubled past, and grows misty for scenes that might—might!—only be fantasies; there's also an ecstatic blood-shower scene that strongly recalls Carrie. But despite the fact that Lucie grows continually weaker and more haggard-looking the closer she becomes with Ernessa, there's never a vulgar flash of fangs; and a flurry of moths is really no match for a single late-night bat in terms of vampiric signifiers. In its determination to avoid genre clichés, the movie drains itself of simple pleasures. It wants to creep us out in a hipper way, but the result is a strangely bloodless exercise.   

Kurt Loder is a writer living in New York. His third book, a collection of film reviews called The Good, the Bad and the Godawful, is now available. Follow him on Twitter at kurt_loder. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A.M. Links: America "Within an Inch of War," China Mocks India, LA School District Lowering Standards

Kurt Loder is a New York writer who also hosts the SiriusXM interview show True Stories.

CultureMoviesStaff Reviews
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (17)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Barfman   13 years ago

    Darling Companion is a movie that Woody Allen might have made if he had (a) no gift for narrative charm, (b) no knack for tangy banter, and (c) no sense of humor.

    *barf*

  2. CockGobbla   13 years ago

    Question:

    Stupider MTV News-anchor name:

    Kurt Loder or Gideon Yago?

    GO!

    1. Copernicus   13 years ago

      Get a loder this.

  3. RPR2   13 years ago

    so you can't come up with any evidence that Woody Allen didn't make Darling Companion?

  4. NotSure   13 years ago

    I agree about the "traditional genre idiocy" that the author mentions here. Why do the makers of these movies always have to assume that their characters have never seen zombie of vampire movies themselves ?

  5. R C Dean   13 years ago

    Dammit! I wanted to slag on Woody, but I see I'm trailing the pack.

    1. Randian   13 years ago

      There is never a saturation point on Woody Allen slag.

    2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      I like his earlier, funnier movies.

      1. SusanM   13 years ago

        he has funny movies? Never would have guessed.

        1. SusanM   13 years ago

          And Loder (or anyone who's ever been connected with the bloated pretentious hipness that is Rolling Stone snarking that something is too hip

          1. SusanM   13 years ago

            ...is really kind of odd.

  6. rangomooo   13 years ago

    OK wow, that makes no sense at all dude, None.

    http://www.Anon-Data.tk

  7. Randian   13 years ago

    Darling Companion is a movie that Woody Allen might have made if he had (a) no gift for narrative charm, (b) no knack for tangy banter, and (c) no sense of humor.

    When did this happen, exactly?

  8. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    They did another The Moth Diaries??? These reboots are out of control. Did they at least give Richard Gere and Laura Linney cameos?

    1. Brandybuck   13 years ago

      Hollywood is unable to be original. I understand that they can't write their own material and would at least have to adapt a play or a novel. But geez, do you have to copy movies too?

      Imagine if painters all had to copy each other, and ever time you walked into an art gallery there would be another reboot of Guernica or Starry Night, each worse than the last. That's what Hollywood is.

      1. LarryA   13 years ago

        Hollywood knows exactly what its audience needs: A bold new concept with a proven track record.

        1. neoteny   13 years ago

          A good one. 🙂

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!