Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Reason Writers on The Alyona Show: Matt Welch Talks Voter Access, Plea Bargaining in America, and Public Attitudes About War

Reason Staff | 3.13.2012 7:42 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Last night, Reason Editor in Chief Matt Welch went on The Alyona Show's "Monday Hangover" segment to talk about all of the above for just under 10 minutes:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Shikha Dalmia on Affirmative Action and the Supreme Court

Reason Staff
PoliticsPolicyWorldCriminal JusticeWarVoter ID
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (40)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Voting is a right of citizenship here but for fuck sake we have to put in a little effort. The internet brings greater access to voter information such as registration status and polling locations. Don't have the internet? Go to your election bureau, the lines should be short because everyone else is checking online rather than in person.

    Voter ID? Why not. Prove you are who you say you are. Put in a little effort. Just because voter fraud is underreported doesn't mean it doesn't take place. We can't keep designing a consequence-free environment in this country.

    1. Minority Voter   13 years ago

      Put in a little effort.

      WTF?!

      1. Suki   13 years ago

        Morning links before noon.

    2. Sparky   13 years ago

      Just because voter fraud is underreported doesn't mean it doesn't take place.

      Wrong. Voter fraud is illegal and therefore doesn't happen. Get your facts straight.

    3. MNG   13 years ago

      Yes FOE, it's just a snap for elderly shut ins to get on the internet or slip by the local "election bureau."

      Lord, the lack of awareness of others situations in this post is incredible.

      1. MNG   13 years ago

        I can understand concern about voter fraud. For decades when we voted there was really no check on if voters were who they said they were. There didn't seem to be any problem, but there could have been easily.

        Having said that, in a democracy the entire legitimacy of the enterprise rests on the consent of the ruled. If we take that seriously we should make real efforts to make it easier to vote, not harder, we want as much consent as possible. We should have voter workers go to people's houses and register the votes. If you want to ask for some ID in the process that would not be unreasonable, but the point is we should want more, not less voting.

        1. Sparky   13 years ago

          we want as much consent as possible.

          And as many times as necessary to get the right person elected.

          1. MNG   13 years ago

            Like I said, ironically when the government doesn't provide a neutral way to get all of these folks into the process that means only via partisan GOTV methods will some of them do so. Is that better? WTF?

          2. Suki   13 years ago

            The FL Supreme Court model: keep recounting until Gore wins.

            1. MNG   13 years ago

              If Suki actually existed she was likely part of that mob beating on the doors of the county election board in FL. Cuz that's what fairnes looks like!

        2. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

          I agree that voting should be in some ways easier. Weekend voting would be one change I would make. However, if you make fraudulent voting easier then you are watering down the legitimate will of the people, and it is you who are disenfranchising voters. You, I say!

          1. MNG   13 years ago

            As noted, that doesn't seem to be happening much.

            For decades in nearly every state you would just go into your precint and say "I'm John Doe from 555 Fake St" and you'd vote and they would cross you off the list. If there were rampant voter fraud then people would be coming in and finding someone had already voted in their name. That hasn't been found at all.

            On the other hand we're pretty sure that these laws keep people from voting that otherwise would.

            1. Sparky   13 years ago

              If there were rampant voter fraud then people would be coming in and finding someone had already voted in their name.

              Not necessarily. It's not hard to show up at the polling station late, glance at the list of names, and pick one that hasn't been crossed off. You just pick out all the names of the people who haven't and weren't going to vote.

              1. MNG   13 years ago

                I never got to "glance at the list" when I showed up.

                That might work for showing up late all the time and if you had a glance, but then again a lot of places have volunteers working the polls across the political spectrum, so it's unlikely it's rampant.

                But look where you're at: "it could happen, imagine this!"

                1. Sparky   13 years ago

                  But look where you're at: "it could happen, imagine this!"

                  And look where you're at: "it doesn't happen, ever."

                2. Kochtopussy   13 years ago

                  I never got to "glance at the list" when I showed up.

                  Reading upside-down isn't that hard.

            2. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

              As noted, that doesn't seem to be happening much.

              As noted, I disagree. It hasn't been reported much. I've had the opportunity to talk with my county's former election chief, and he tells me there's a reason that Philadelphia County didn't want to participate in Pennsylvania's SURE voter registration system.

              Anecdotal, to be certain, but I believe it to be true.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

        If they can't get out to check registration then how are they getting out to vote? No, if there's one thing old people know how to do, it's vote.

        1. MNG   13 years ago

          This might shock you, but in elections there are often volunteers that will come get the elderly voter and take them to the polls. There often is not the same thing for registration.

          Ironically, when that kind of thing does happen it is part of explicitly partisan GOTV efforts. Wouldn't it be nice if it happened as part of a more neutral process?

          "if there's one thing old people know how to do, it's vote."

          Yes, because if there is a correlation it must mean its true in ALL cases.

          Sheesh.

          1. Joe M   13 years ago

            Those same volunteers could surely get them to where they need to go to register, no?

            1. RBS   13 years ago

              That's crazy talk Joe!

  2. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

    Matt, you did very well, considering you were forced to stand your ground while a camera dive-bombed you, but it would have been better if you'd overcome your charming natural modesty to mention you'd written a book. Copies won't sell themselves you know. Oh, and kudos on being a sharp-dressed man - you're doing H&R commenters proud

    1. Joe M   13 years ago

      He still needs to refine his shirt/tie color coordination. I'll also note he is beardless.

      1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

        Doherty's beard subsumes all others within a 3 mile radius.

  3. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Didn't you like write a book or something?

    1. Suki   13 years ago

      +1

  4. Tim   13 years ago

    IS this Putin approved TV?

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      In Soviet Union, TV watches YOU.

      1. Deja Moo   13 years ago

        American Express: Don't leave home without it.
        Soviet Express: Don't leave home.

        1. Girlfriend Express   13 years ago

          Don't. Just, don't.

  5. Suki   13 years ago

    Welch shilling for ACORN?

  6. albo   13 years ago

    Why do you still go on this silly Russian government mouthpiece show?

    Did they promise you a dacha in Bronnitsy?

    1. NotSure   13 years ago

      It actually not bad when they do not discuss Russian domestic politics. You will find that most media are not objective when it comes to covering their home turf, when they cover further abroad it is more watchable.

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        Yeah, The Alyona Show is better than most news/opinion shows on tv these days. The other shows on RT though, not so much.

  7. Les Davis   13 years ago

    Kinda makes you wonder who comes up with all that stuff lol.

    http://www.Getting-Privacy.tk

  8. R C Dean   13 years ago

    One thing that we've done that has made voter fraud much, much easier than in the past is having the polls open for days or weeks at a time.

    With voting on only one day, a fraudster could only cast so many ballots. With voting open much longer, they have more opportunities, and maintaining security on the ballot box is made exponentially harder.

    Couple that with the ridiculous ease of getting an absentee ballot, and you've got a very vulnerable system.

  9. R C Dean   13 years ago

    Here's my plan:

    General election polls are open for one day and one day only. That day is a national holiday. You have to show photo ID to vote.

    Absentee ballots have to be picked up in person. You have to show voter ID to get one.

    Those who can't travel to register or vote can call a number, and someone will come get them. Since the parties seem to have so much money for GOTV, they get to do the fetching on a first-come first-serve basis.

    1. Sparky   13 years ago

      I like it. After all, if voting is so important to our American way of life why have it on a Tuesday?

      1. Joe M   13 years ago

        After all, if voting is so important to our American way of life why have it on a Tuesday?

        This is seriously the biggest problem with our voting schedule. You want to talk about disenfranchisement? Think of all the productive members of society with kids who struggle to make time on a workday to get to the polling place.

  10. yonemoto   13 years ago

    Iran has a deterrent effect?

    Afghanistan was the "graveyard of empires". Come on.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Belated Republican Objections to the One Big Beautiful Bill Glide Over Its Blatant Fiscal Irresponsibility

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 2:50 PM

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use

Autumn Billings | 6.4.2025 11:40 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!