Romney's Troubled Michigan Homecoming
Will the Wolverine State be the final nail in the Romney campaign's coffin?
Michigan was supposed to be the state where Mitt Romney cakewalked his way to the Republican nomination. After all, he was born and brought up here by a father who served as a three-term governor. Instead, Romney is stumbling—badly.
But whether he recovers—or falls into a political abyss, never to be heard from again—might depend on his ability to do something that so far has completely eluded him: offer a vision. Making tribalistic appeals and brandishing his resume, as he's been doing, isn't working so far—and might never work.
It is hard at this stage not to feel sorry for Romney, no matter how off-putting his perfectly coiffed hair (and positions). No sooner does he slay one Republican rival than another one rears his tousled head. Rick Perry. Herman Cain. Jon Huntsman. Newt Gingrich. And now Rick Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator, has vaulted from behind to establish a sizeable lead over Romney among the Wolverine State's primary voters. Romney has closed the lead somewhat in the last week but still remains several points behind.
Smart opinion attributes Romney's Michigan travails to his opposition to the auto bailout—the one issue on which he has not flip-flopped. He was against the bailout in 2008 and he was still against it as of this week. Liz Granderson, a CNN.com commentator, speaks for many of her fellow pundits when she notes that Romney turned his back on Michigan after he won the primary in 2008, so now Michigan is turning its back on him.
And that will certainly be true in the general election which Romney will have little chance of winning unless the economy goes into a double dip. But this is a primary contest, where Romney has to prove his bona fides to conservative voters, not union diehards, although Michigan does not prohibit cross-party voting. And even though more conservatives in Michigan supported the bailout than elsewhere, they did so out of fear and desperation, not conviction—something that no doubt induced a fair amount of cognitive dissonance in them. It is highly unlikely, therefore, that they would turn this issue into a litmus test for their candidates. Indeed, if that were the case, Santorum wouldn't be in the lead, since he is no fan of the bailout either. In fact, like Romney, he is on record saying that he would have let the auto industry fail.
Clearly, something else accounts for why Romney is sinking and Santorum is soaring. And it is not only that Santorum offers a more authentic persona against Romney's robotic façade. Nor that Romney is a Mormon and Santorum is not. Nor that Romney has the RomneyCare millstone tied around his neck and Santorum doesn't.
It is because Santorum is articulating a values-based conservative vision that appeals greatly to Michigan's Calvinist voters, especially in the western part of the state. This vision's unabashed reliance on big government might cause some internal friction with the limited-government leanings of these voters, especially since Santorum is given to saying things like "[The] idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do … is not how traditional conservatives view the world." But these voters are in sync with Santorum's broader ends: faith, family, and country.
Romney could swoop in, Reagan-like, and occupy the gaping holes in Santorum's message, offering a free-market alternative that combines fiscal discipline with a commitment to achieving conservative ends by limiting, not expanding, government. For example, he could argue that faith is best advanced by rebuilding the wall between church and state—a wall that George W. Bush's faith-based initiatives breached by throwing government aid at religious charities. This, he might go on to say, no doubt made it easier for President Obama to issue his mandate demanding that Catholic outfits pay for contraceptive coverage.
But Romney seems singularly incapable of articulating broad themes. He comes across as an utterly prosaic man who thinks in concretes, unable to abstract grand principles. When Michigan voters are pining for soaring rhetoric, Romney is rattling off his "private sector" accomplishments. When they want uplifting poetry, he is busy making trite hometown-boy appeals, asking them to vote for him because he is "a son of Detroit."
Romney's latest TV ad declares that, for him, "Michigan is personal." Actually, Michigan is going to be his denouement. So if there is any corner of his soul where some principles and poetry are tucked away, he should pull them out now. Or his birthplace might be where he ends up burying his political aspirations.
Reason Foundation Senior Analyst Shikha Dalmia is a columnist at The Daily, where a version of this column originally appeared.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In politics the only thing that matters is that people like you. Whatever the reasons, it seems too many people do not like this guy, he really should just quit.
Romney seems like a decent enough guy who has absolutely nothing he believes in and no point to his campaign. He looks like a stereotypical empty suit and talks like one too often as well. Not to mention that he has he body language and charisma of a patrician snob (which I don't think he is, but still). Nobody warms to him because he gives them no reason to...which is why he's a horrible presidential candidate.
Well, people didn't like Nixon, and he was reelected in a landslide. Hillary is unlikable, and she'll win the Democrat nomination in 2016.
Romney is a little stiff/nerdy, but still more likable than either of those two.
I dunno, I think he stirs up a lot of resentment in many of the GOP demographics...
I mean, Newt Gingrich pretty much was the average talk show radio caller. Or at least how they viewed themselves.
And Santorum is pretty much the creepy religious social conservative type. Go to a church, and they'll be a dozen of there, like zombies.
Romney on the other hand, is like a Ken doll. It's hard to relate to someone like that, unless you also look like that (which most people don't).
Doesn't help that he was born to great wealth, yet basically forsook it to make his own fortune (which he did). He makes people feel inadequate there, too.
Well, people didn't like Nixon,
That's just bullshit.
The republican base liked Nixon in the late 60s, he was one of them, and was pugnacious in taking on their joint enemies.
Likable is just not enough. In order to get people interested the candidate must inspire voters in some way. The voters want to see that the candidate sees the future and can create a better future, a la "Morning in America" or "Hope and Change" or "Bridge to the 21st Century".
But, dude. The Hair.
What am I, chopped liver?
The GOP nominee will be selected based upon their stance on abortion.
Nothing else matters.
Not quite true. You must be a warmonger who wants to go to war with everybody and anybody and be a fundie.
Not everybody and anybody. Just the Middle East.
As long as there's war going on there then there's a chance that the Rapture will happen in our lifetime.
Very good. You are correct.
Yep. Pretty much how Democrats do it, too.
Yep. Pretty much how Democrats do it, too.
Yep. Pretty much how Democrats do it, too.
Oh good, THREE times. *&%^%$...
Holy temporal squirrel farts!
looking for the bilover?===Datebi*cO'm=== is a site for bisexual and bicurious singles and friends.Here you can find hundreds of thousands of open-minded singles & couples looking to explore their bisexuality.sign up for free.
"
Ummm...I think you mean L.Z. Granderson of CNN and not "Liz"...and he's a dude. A gay dude who offers really insipid columns with half-assed logic to them, but still a dude nonetheless.
Wah wah wah waaaaah
You have to remember that the other choices are Santorum and Gingrich.
Romney is plenty likeable compared to those two. He's frickin' Jackie Gleason compared to those two.
To most people. But as I said in my other post, a good chunk of GOP voters idealize themselves as Newt Gingrich. And ditto for Santorum.
But who can relate to Mitt?
Dammit, isn't it bad enough that the MSM ignore Paul? Are H&R commenters going to ignore him now?
Yes. The GOP has effectively killed any chance Paul had.
Paul might appeal to 3/4ths of the country - but not to the people that vote in the Republican primaries. Those are the only people that matter in determining the nominee. Perhaps you didn't notice that he is polling fourth of late. Case closed.
I think the bottom line is that Romney is a Morman and that's not going to fly in the Midwest. They sure do lick that Santorum up though, don't they? This is a case were the actual statement is more disgusting than the metaphor.
And Santorum's appeal in Michigan has nothing to do with flinty Calvinist values.
Santorum is on top in Michigan because Michigan is now a moocher state, and Santorum speaks for the moochers.
This. Romney's against the auto bailout, and that's like being against subsidies for ethanol in Iowa.
Romney is for the moochers as well.
There is no evidence that he supports the ending of crony capitalism. In fact, hasn't he called for maintaining defense outlays if not giving the military industrial national security national surveillance state more payola?
On a personal level, its not like its some slam dunk that Romney is more likeable than santorum or Newtie.
If one is stiff and not able to relax and light up a fattie and fling the feces while being comfy in one's skin, it shows. Of the three, I don't think one can credibly argue that Romney beats the other two in this department. In fact, the other two beat him.
Basic likeability? How about phoniness. Romeny, imo, gives off a very strong scent of phoniness. Not that the newtster of saintorah are without it, but romney has them beat big time.
Mitt Romney strapped the family dog, Seamus, to the roof of his station wagon and drove at 60mph until the dog shit itself. Seamus apparently fled across the border into Canada a few years later.
Any man who straps his dog to the roof of his station wagon is unfit to be president. Any man who drives a station wagon is unfit to be president.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bro.....nada_.html
Any dog who flees to Canada is unfit to be president too
It's a dog, and it was in a dog carrier thing. Who cares?
I mean seriously, I don't like Romney, but attacking him on this makes me sympathetic. It's a fucking dog.
Read carefully. I said, "any man who straps his dog to the roof of his station wagon is unfit to be president."
If he'd been driving something even vaguely masculine, then this wouldn't have been an issue. Lashing the dog to the roof, sans carrier, would be OK as long as he was driving a Hummer or a Jeep or something manly. But a station wagon? Not sure how you can be sympathetic toward that.
Are we talking original Hummer or the later variants like the H2 and H3? The original hummer was manly. The H2 and H3 just scream, "I'm overcompensating."
Are we talking original Hummer or the later variants like the H2 and H3?
We're talking the OG Hummer. The one that, when you turn the key, flowers wilt and birds drop dead from the trees.
It was a different, simpler time. The end of an era. A time before Hummers and mass market SUV's and even the humble mini-van.
Any "man" who takes his dead baby home to play with, is unfit to be President.
What's her face has been putting this in every one of her columns for years just waiting for him to be the nominee.
Any man who drives a station wagon is unfit to be president.
Well, depending on the station wagon.
http://www.caranddriver.com/re.....-road-test
HERE'S a station wagon
http://www.google.com/imgres?i.....Ag&dur=719
I realize Reason probably doesn't choose their ads, but has anyone noticed the Keystone ads lately? It says "Nice work, President Obama. Thanks for saying no to the corporate lobbyists."
Wait, huh? I'm assuming the EDF launched some sort of financial campaign, so wouldn't that make them lobbyists? Why are special interest groups bad only if they're on the right? Not that there's anything wrong with special interest groups, as L. Neil Smith said, what other groups are there? But to pretend that environmentalists are somehow purer lobbyists than the evil corporations seems like it takes some mental gymnastics...
The ads I often get are senior dating, lesbian dating, Australian immigration and debt counsellors. None of them are anything I am interested in.
What about mature lesbian Australian debt counsellors?
Interesting, I only get political ads, and occasionally an ad for traveling to Las Vegas. Now I'm getting ads for Newt, it's like the ads don't know me at all! (Besides Las Vegas obviously, as everyone know libertarians are all hedonists.)
You realize that if you click those links you take money from those groups and give it to Reason, right?
"You realize that if you click those links you take money from those groups and give it to Reason, right?"
True, I just clicked on an ad for a petition to "OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED".
I'm getting multiple ads from the Australian Government telling me to stop smoking*. Since I'm paying for them anyway I might as well click on them like a lab rat getting food pellets
* I never have of course. That's my government for you...
Is this really how it works? So every time I click on the Anti-Rehberg ad, the Tester campaign has to donate money to Reason? Oh, the sweet, delicious, irony. (click).
(click)
(click)
I will now summon new ads for you!
GAY DATING!
RUSSIAN BRIDES!
ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT!
Click away dude.
How to combat Global Warming with this ONE WEIRD TRICK!
White voters are demographically splitting into upscale, educated liberals/RINOs and poorly educated working class conservative voters.
Romney is hated by the latter group which comprises the big majority of GOP support.
I am upscale, I am better than all those christfags and bushpigs.
Don't you think that there are some affluent christfags?
Look at that hair, that glorious hair. That's the key to the election. Promise everyone government subsidized hair products and he wins by a landslide.
Santorum is soaring
The State of the Nation in a nutshell.
"Will the Wolverine State be the final nail in the Romney campaign's coffin?"
God I hope so. If so, it will only be Ayatola Santorum who stands in Ron Paul's way and he is easy to defeat - Santorum is defeating himself as he speasks.
Nah, we'd just see Newt Surge IV: Electric Boogaloo.
"Electric Boogaloo." Reminds me of a pink Filipino film I saw back in the 70s.
I certainly share your believe that Romney's disappearance from the race would help Paul big time. Unfortunately I don't think losing Michigan will really kill Romney's campaign and even if the convention is brokered he'll get the nomination as the 'safe' candidate.
Paul vs Obama in the general would be awesome.
I expect it'll be Paul vs Obama vs GOP-nominee, but yes.
"God I hope so. If so, it will only be Ayatola Santorum who stands in Ron Paul's way and he is easy to defeat - Santorum is defeating himself as he speasks."
Are you serious? The Republican establishment is against Paul. He will not get the Republican nomination!
"?the one issue on which he has not flip-flopped. He was against the bailout in 2008 and he was still against it as of this week."
I loved that; I actually scrolled to check who wrote it
One word: abortion.
Single issue fundy conservatives will always vote for the one who squeaks loudest about abortion, regardless of their record for supporting big government.
In this case that person is Santorum.
I can't believe opponents outed Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, and CNN covered it with the rag that broke the story
The Phoenix New Times isn't a rag...it's actually done some very good reporting about the abuses of Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County. They're a radical tabloid, but they're a radical tabloid that finds good stuff.
How was the story relevant to politics?
Society has learned nothing since Alan Turing
Wasn't there some question about whether his gay lover was an illegal?
He was not and the reporter from the rag addressed this fact on CNN; the "conservatives have a right to know" was her message
Has anyone raken a look at the Obama approval ratings on Rasmussen recently? The upward trend indicates to me that Americans are either completely fucking with pollsters or they are trying to say something about Santorum/Romney/Gingrich.
or they have seen the light.
** rubs fist **
Would it be correct to think that generally voters will give first-term governments the benefit of the doubt? Only 8 US presidents have lost their re-election bids, and one was Grover Cleveland who of course ultimately won the White House again. So the poll figures might be a combination of voters' lazy indulgence of the incumbent combined with the GOP crapness. And of course a percentage are just fucking with the pollsters.
"The upward trend indicates to me that Americans are either completely fucking with pollsters or they are trying to say something about Santorum/Romney/Gingrich."
The answer is most Americans are stupid.
I was trying to be nice.
That's so rare here.
Maybe they're starting to compare him to the competition.
As was pointed out by someone below, the CNN contributor's name is LZ Granderson, who is in fact male. That he's also an LGBT personality makes the misfired female pronouns all the more touchy. Please correct this so as not to invite the hell and the noise of a public backlash on my precious reason.com!
Please go to hell. I am so tired of political correctness. I do not care about Mr./Mrs. Granderson's sexual orientation, nor do I care if someone offends him/her.
I am an idiot redneck and it's my Gawd-given right to be a stupid bigot, loudly and often.
I too am tired of political correctness. The point of my post, dicksneeze, was that I don't want knee-jerk political correctness aimed at the good folks of reason due to sloppy fact checking. We're on the same team, but your lack of reading comprehension has relegated you to the bench.
Politcal correctness will die when it's enforcers are laughed at as the kooks that they are.
Playing their game delays that time.
So fuck off sycophant.
Apart from Ron Paul, it's pretty amusing what a motley lot the GOP candidates this time around have been. I see people on conservative boards actually hoping that Perry or Bachmann will reenter the race.
Romney is in deep doo doo if he loses Michigan. There will be a shockwave and the GOP royals will begin to jump ship. Romney wants to be president because he is a Mormon pioneer and because his father failed to accomplish this. The problem is that the presidency should be about more than an one's individual accomplishment, it should have at least something to do with wanting the country to succeed at large. Romney does not come across as a guy who is interested in his fellow man.
Mr. Romney doesn't care about his fellow dog either!
Do you really think Romney is going to lose? He's got hundreds of millions of dollars of his own money. He exhibits no reticence in slandering his fellow opponents, especially Newt! Romney waives his resume in the air and acts like this is a job interview. The people are thirsty for a leader and that man is cherry poppin' Newt Gingrich.
Yeah. Romney is a sure winner. He's cratering on INtrade! If he loses his birth state of Michigan its over like the first snow of Fall.
Cherry poppin' Newt Gingrich?
In the words of Sarah Palin: WTF?
I need a brain cleanse after that thought.
This guy lives in his moms basement just writing stuff hoping someone will read it... don't feed the trolls
I said several keen things in my post, yet the woman can't help but focus on the one that has to do with the material act of fornication. Go figure!
Are you saying that all women can think about is material things, especially the act of fornication? That's rich, I thought it was guys who thought of sex all the time.
Let me put it this way: how many famous female philosophers can you name? And don't give me that Simone de Beauvoir bullshit -- bimbo stole all her good ideas laying in bed with Sartre.
Question my brothers: Do you really think that "historic" Obama will lose when the DOW is 13000 and Osama sleeps with the fishes? If the establishment types wish to reassert control over our Grand Ole Party they we would be prudent to support a Santorum ticket because a Goldwateresque disaster for the GOP led by the Limbaugh-Palin-Birther wing of the party would go a long way towards shaming these imbeciles and their mouth breathing sock puppets.
Yes! This is what we must do! To destroy the BIG GOVERNMENT loving social CONS once and for all we must labor to give them their Santorumation! Liberty will rise out of the ashes
I dream of living in a free society where multinational companies are castrated, monopolies abolished, regulations eased, political cronyism ended,prohibitions prohibited, laws strictly and fairly enforced -- a place where it is easy to start a business and difficult to bribe a politician. That place sure as hell ain't Limbaugher's America
Imagine how Rush Limbaugh would open his show the day after a landslide loss of a Santorum-Palin ticket at the hands of a Marxist Muslim. Would it be too much for the fat tub of lard to take?
I really enjoyed Rush's show the day after Clinton got reelected. He cried all day.
Just passing through.
Is that some kind of muted Valley Forge reference? What is with this place lately? Geesh.