Rick Santorum: Against Contraception, Against Online Gambling
We know Rick Santorum casts a gimlet eye on contraception because he feels "it's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."
Now we know that the GOP presidential candidate - leading his party's nominating race in some polls - is also against online gambling. From the Las Vegas Sun via Jim Geraghty at the National Review, here's Santo's proclamation on the evils of cyberspace wagering:
Just as we've seen from a lot of other things that are vices on the Internet, they end to grow exponentially as a result of that. It's one thing to come to Las Vegas and do gaming and participate in the shows and that kind of thing as entertainment, it's another thing to sit in your home and have access to that it. I think it would be dangerous to our country to have that type of access to gaming on the Internet.
Santorum is against non-marital sex and gambling. What's next, banning step aerobics? Exactly how is this great nation supposedly to unwind?
One point worth making: Santorum makes a classic prohibitionist's mistake. He thinks that the law dictates the status of activity. When it comes to online gambling, Americans already had access to it long before there was definitive ruling on whether it was legal or not.
Prohibition doesn't squelch a targeted activity, even as it can reduce the number of participants. It drives an often-smaller number of people to more desperate measures, and introduces all sorts of criminal or black or gray market problems. And it makes anyone with an problem to seek help. I'd like to have a president who is capable of understanding that, or at least debating it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I preferred the previous alt-text to that picture.
Does the Santorum coverage here indicate a genuine belief amongst Reason's target audience that this...this thing...has a legitimate chance of becoming the Republican candidate?...or is it just...you know...filler material?
Discuss.
Dudes! What is up with Rick Santorum's daughter?
She looks like him in drag, the poor thing.
Looking to bring more bisexual passion to your life? Welcome to=== Datebi.C/0/M ===, the world's largest bisexual community for no strings attached encounters. Hundreds of thousands pretty girls and handsome guys eager for hookups, bisexual stands, and discreet affairs are active here. Come in and discover the excitement you deserve! u_u
Looking to bring more bisexual passion to your life?
That goes without saying.
We are nothing if not...free orifices, free relationships.
"it's a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."
Is he unaware that the lack of available contraception might lead youths to engage in certain "things in the sexual realm" that he would consider "counter to how things are supposed to be", namely certain activities which would produce his namesake?
That's not in the sexual realm.
I gotta agree with Technical Virgin on this one, man....
*two thumbs up and a lower-lip bite*
No idea if it's urban legend or true, but I've long heard that such activities are especially popular in some heavily Catholic countries for just this reason...
according to my stepdaughter, they are popular in this country, too. For the same reason.
"counter to how things are supposed to be"
What a sad sad little man. I might feel sorry for him if he wasn't such a santorum.
Santorum makes a classic prohibitionist's mistake. He thinks that the law dictates the status of activity.
Don't they all. The most successful is the a-hole who sets up a system that works with human tendencies, not against them.
He's not saying he'd outlaw it. This article sucks. For a better reasoned piece go to the WSJ:
http://online.wsj.com/article/.....TopOpinion
He would be against it if he didn't know that such a wildly unpopular take would doom him. So he plays the flirt with moderation while winking to the socon across the room.
Lost_in_translation, Mind Reader Extrodinaire.
You don't even want to know what Gingrich is thinking....I'll give you a hint, it rhymes sexy space slaves... Oops
Winking to Socons... that's a risky gesture.
Too bad, Pip.
The guy unabashedly advocates a powerful and intrusive state to "support families".
If he had a coherent, rigorous, and autistically consistent Constitutionalist outlook like Paul's, I'd listen to his personal opinion on contraception and conclude that it had no relationship to how he'd actually govern. But he doesn't have that, so I have to assume the worst. Without such consistency, he could wake up tomorrow morning and decide to ban contraception by executive order using Obamacare powers.
I don't have to read his mind. Because I don't trust him, I have to evaluate him based on the worst-case scenario possible given what I do know.
You misspelled the hat tip.
I hope we hear more about this stuff from Santorum and his supporters, because I can't see it helping him any. Speaking of his idiot supporters, here's what one of his rich backers had to say recently:
Foster Friess, a prominent backer of Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, raised eyebrows Thursday when he offered up his own idea for a possible contraceptive method: "This contraceptive thing, my gosh, it's so... inexpensive. Back in my days, they used Bayer aspirin for contraceptives."
Friess's implication is that if women hold aspirin between their legs, they won't open them.
"The gals put it between their knees, and it wasn't that costly,"
Foster Friess: In my day, women "used Bayer aspirin for contraceptives"
You know, if women would just wear burkas they wouldn't tempt men to sin (not even in their hearts) and we wouldn't need contraception or abortion. This would be better because no doubt some women are allergic to aspirin.
"You misspelled the hat tip."
I have no doubt that Anal Vanneman knows all there is to know about Santorum.
The look of horror on Andrea Mitchell's face was priceless!
I thought any look on Andrea Mitchells face other than the default scowl would cause it to crack and fall off of her skull!
The good news today is that Dave Mustaine woke from his drunken stupor to realize that Shawn White did, indeed, steal his haircut, and that that the former Senator from Pennsylvania's name is not Rick Sanitarium.
Mr. Gillespie, respectfully, please re-read the second to last sentence.
It makes as much sense as anything Santorum says.
You left out "historic".
Was this year's slate of Republican candidates picked at random from phone books?
We wish!
It worked for me.
He hates these cans. Stay away from the cans!
Santorum will outlaw cat juggling, too.
But I do endorse felinophilia.
No. You'd get a better crop of candidates if they'd come from random out of the phone book.
What would Sanatorium think about some of the colonies using lotteries to buy guns and ammo for their troops? George Washington would have come out of the lavatory holding only his dick if innovative ways weren't found to armed and equip the Continental Army.
STOP SPELLING MY NAME WRONG!
See above for the correct spelling!
As miserable as Santorum himself is, I find his popularity cheering. It's great to see the peasants finally giving The Enlightened? a big fat middle finger right in the face. It's unfortunate they don't have a more worthwhile candidate to vote for. Still, I'll cheer for any opportunity to see some oh-so-Enlightened teeth knocked down some oh-so-Tolerant throats.....
While that may be heartening he would be worse in so many ways than Paul, Gingrich or romney's worst policies combined.
He's a libertarian dream because he has absolutely zero chance of implementing any of his agenda.
So wait, would you prefer a candidate that prohibits darkies from backtalking, or one that just prohibits darkies?
Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Franklin and the rest of The Enlightened? would like to give two big middle fingers to you and the mob.
Don't kid yourself, pal. You might want to think about what positions the likes Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Franklin, et al, actually took on the issues that are near and dear to your heart. I'm willing to bet they were a lot closer to my position then they are to yours.
Linkies?
This coming from a racist POS like yourself means absolutely nothing to most of us.
I, for one, welcome a primary win by a SoCon gasbag like Santorum. The juicy tears from people like you that will result from the beating that would no doubt follow from Obama would almost make his second term worth it.
Santorum is running to the right of the Amish.
The Amish are very socialist. Everybody builds the barn. Everybody helps with the harvest. And don't even get me started on Amish add-on homes.
Yeah, but they screw like beavers.
Unlike you I have never had sex with a castor canadensis, so I can't make the comparison, but I'll take your word for it.
So you're saying you have had sex with Amish chicks?
ahh..... Amish women. Lancaster county barn-raising orgies. The memories. LA pornstars have nothing on cow-milking pros. Plus, girdles are actually pretty sexy. They're totally coming back.
It's like the republicans are trying to throw the game. Ok, which GOP leader put his money on Obama?
Boom, baby!
And it makes anyone with an problem to seek help.
Please rewrite.
Poor, unloved and sexually frustrated Ricky. Was such a rare bird in highschool. But just look at him fly now! Eat your heart out, jockoes!
So wait...
Is he against non-marital sex, and against gambling, or is he only against non-marital sex and gambling?
In the end I think he sees very little difference between gambling and non-marital sex. He's against card counting in both cases.
Is it fun? Then I'm against it.
I'm catching Santorum Fever!!
I'm sure you're catching something from Santorum...
I think he is for "going to shows", if you know what I mean.
And sex after marriage is a gamble.
Or, as some would say, a gambol.
Rick Santorum is obviously White Indian.
"Rick Santorum: Against Contraception, Against Online Gambling"
You forgot to say, "Against Thinking For Yourself."
"Honey, I'm ready to put your diaphragm on!"
So I'm guessing strip poker is the bane of Santorum's existence?
So I'm guessing GAY strip poker is the bane of Santorum's existence?
FTFM.
Hit and run baby! Hit and run, oh yeah!
http://www.anon-dot.tk
Nick, you might want to look at your right sleeve - ya got a little santorum on The Jacket.
No need to thank me, bud.
Rick Santorum: All The Regulations And Entitlements, None Of Teh Sex.
I think it would be dangerous to our country to have that type of access to gaming on the Internet.
*facepalm*
And I think you're a greater danger, fuckstain. I hope you get ass raped by a gang of female impersonators and your god sends you to hell for it, you authoritariun fuck.
That is all.
I follow the 80-20 rule - I believe in 80% of the Ten Commandments.
And Debbie Wasserman Schultz said all women should get free contraception. Okay, can I have free whiskey and ice cream too? Rick Santorum said he is not for restricting contraception.
I do not care what Rick Santorum's personal beliefs are provided he is not trying to restrict it and is arguing that we should not give it (or anything else) away. To paraphrase P.J. O'Rourke, if you think health care is expensive now, wait till it is free!
Except unlike Ron Paul, Santorum's personal beliefs = political beliefs. What he thinks is good for himself is what he thinks is good for America.
Sounds like what liberals do, as well, np...
He is trying to restrict online gambling ... you know, the point of this post.
So that must be why he voted for Medicare Part D, so I can pay for old farts' pills. Fuck Santorum.
Santorum should love this, then:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....f=politics
Hint, Reason: You could do a better story on that than HP did.
If it's fun it should be banned.
He doesn't believe in banning contraception. He's given direct statements to that effect.
I agree that most politicians don't have any separation between disliking something and wanting to ban it. Santorum, of course, likes to pretend that politics is a debate and about scoring points, so he likes to seek out little edge conditions and points (like opposing women in combat because of men's behavior in wanting to protect them, a point of view that has better social science support than most reasons against.)
I don't believe him.
And it makes anyone with an problem to seek help.
You all make me sick. Nick throws us a bone and it goes unnoticed for 70 comments.
All types of Prohibition have the same outcome. It makes ordinary people criminals and professional criminals millionaires.
Faith, family, and freedom!
Except the freedom part.
How does Santorum being against internet gambling make him different than any other non-Paul candidate including Obama?
Maybe Santorum's different because he comes right out and says it, and maybe the reason he's against is different (the others are against it because they're being paid to be by casino interests), but it ain't like I can just go and bet on football games or play poker online right now?
Good point vs.
Santorum has not held an executive political office or a PA legislative office. It would be interesting to know what his position on the PA State lottery, where some of the proceeds go to special needs kids, would have been.
I'm pretty sure that every nice sounding charity in the state gets 0.00001% of the proceeds of the lottery.
The lion's share goes to pay for bureaucrat pensions.
Lotteries are very inefficient, Tulpa, but it's more like 25% to 30%.
Having Rick on record, taking a position on the PA lottery's turpitude, would let us know how he would act, which might be different than what he says. I suspect he'd be a hypocrite, if he were ever put to the test.
Here's even more stuff to bury Santorum with.
The Santorum Theocracy - Obama is not the worst we can do
http://tirelessagorist.blogspo.....cracy.html
I dislike the guy and would never vote for him, but he has, of course, repeatedly and consistently stated that he doesn't want to ban or restrict contraception, only that he has a personal opinion against (and doesn't want to subsidize.)
Nick Gillespie is also making the classic Prohibitionist's mistake-- assuming that being against means that the law must be against. In fairness, most politicians do think that way (or at least only comment negatively publicly on things that they want to ban.)
Point me to where Gillespie says Santorum wants to ban contraception.
His reference to the "prohibitionist's mistake" is in reference to online gambling, which RS is certainly in favor of (continuing) banning.
Would it be worth it to have the socon's dream candidate lose to Obama? I'm honestly torn.
Have a drink.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Are you suggesting that Santorum wouldn't continue to ramp up the debt. Santorum isn't a fiscal conservative either.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. "Oh he has said he wouldn't ban contraception," well fuck who gives a shit, he isn't good on ANY policy.
Are you suggesting that Santorum wouldn't continue to ramp up the debt.
No, I'm suggesting, in no specific order, to RC Dean, that he just pet his dog, load his rifle, kiss his kids, take out the trash, and have a drink.
How torn are you? Are you torn so much that Santorum is leaking out of your ass?
Why are people so shocked that Santorum has Catholic views on contraception? He's a Catholic. I understand disagreeing with him (I disagree with him), but the surprise is just weird (I know a lot of orthodox Catholics; they all say pretty much the same things).
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
huh