Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

CATO Responds to SOTU!

Nick Gillespie | 1.25.2012 11:40 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Here's the official video response from the Cato Institute to last night's State of the Union address by President Obama. It's an interesting, nearly point-by-point takedown of every major section of the speech, from foreign policy to the economy to education.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Obama's Big New Housing-Refinance Idea: A Backdoor Stimulus?

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsBarack ObamaElection 2012
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. poetry   13 years ago

    obama obviously caved to the powerful "give-everyone-a-free-pony" lobby from the northeast

    1. Slowburnaz   13 years ago

      Vermin Supreme... I am a meme!

  2. Tman   13 years ago

    Based on the number of mindless Obama-bot posts I see on my facebook pages where they tout his list of supposed "accomplshments" I don't think the GOP has a shot in hell to beat him, despite his complete clusterfuck of a presidency.

    The folks who support him are worse than anything I've ever seen from the right in terms of blind devotion. It doesn't matter who hypocritically awful his SOTU address was because no one in the media is calling him out for lying whatsoever.

    Like the bit about "saving the auto industry", which is one of the biggest lines of bullshit this guy has ever spewed forth, and considering his legacy that's saying something.

    We're going to have to burn the village to the ground to save it. Other than a full on 1970's style depression complete with 25% inflation and gas lines happening in the next eight months, I don't see what's going to stop him. Certainly no one in the GOP gives me any hope.

    1. poetry   13 years ago

      even worse than the ron paul people?

      1. Tman   13 years ago

        A thousand times worse than the RP crowd.

        The RP crowd may be fanatic, but they don't appear as blindly devoted. I think that crowd would be better served supporting Gary Johnson, but that's only because the RP crowd seems more concerned about principles and not hero worship.

      2. Paul   13 years ago

        I would hope that Ron Paul people would disavow him if he engaged in Endless War(tm), bailouts, assasinations of American citizens, prolonged drone attacks and New Dealesque policies despite the overwhelming evidence they were failing.

        1. Brandon   13 years ago

          If President Paul didn't have Gitmo closed and free drugs in the hands of every infant in the country by the Thursday after his inauguration, we would move on to someone more dedicated to the cause.

          1. Paul   13 years ago

            Why would have to wait until Thursday?

            1. bski   13 years ago

              Poor guy is going to need a nap after all the campaigning he's done.

      3. DesigNate   13 years ago

        At least my friends that follow Paul blindly want to expand freedom for the most part. I can't say the same for the one's giving Obama standing ovations in their living rooms.

    2. albo   13 years ago

      I don't think the GOP has a shot in hell to beat him, despite his complete clusterfuck of a presidency

      Yep. it's too late. Americans are growing more entitled, and now we're getting that Euro attitude: gimme gimme gimme.

      If you keep pumping corn down the goose's throat, he'll line up eagerly for more every day.

      1. Paul   13 years ago

        Yep. it's too late. Americans are growing more entitled, and now we're getting that Euro attitude: gimme gimme gimme.

        Getting...getting?!! Dude, it's been done got.

    3. protefeed   13 years ago

      Based on the number of mindless Obama-bot posts I see on my facebook pages where they tout his list of supposed "accomplshments" I don't think the GOP has a shot in hell to beat him, despite his complete clusterfuck of a presidency.

      You might want to consider the possibility that the people who post comments on your FuckBuddy pages are not a representative cross sample of the voters in the handful of swing states that will determine the presidential election.

      "How could Bush have gotten elected? NOBODY I know voted for him?"

      1. Tman   13 years ago

        You might want to consider the possibility that the people who post comments on your FuckBuddy pages are not a representative cross sample of the voters in the handful of swing states that will determine the presidential election.

        I'm not considering it, I'm praying for it! Even though what you're saying is true, and I agree that my anecdotal example is by no means statistically relevant, what I'm amazed by is the complete and total brain washing that has occurred amongst his supporters that I usually consider to be reasonably bright individuals. It's kinda scary, actually.

        "Fuckbuddy pages", I like that.

    4. RZR   13 years ago

      Honestly, as much as every libertarian blog has become the 24-Hour-a-Day NObama Channel, it's hard for me to give a shit. Will we be that much more free under Mittens or the Newter?

      Change is local.

      Also, I remember the right-wing bullshit being pretty damned thick when W was around.

      1. Tman   13 years ago

        the 24-Hour-a-Day NObama Channel

        Well, he has been president for a while now.

        Will we be that much more free under Mittens or the Newter?

        "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. "

        ~C.S. Lewis

        I remember the right-wing bullshit being pretty damned thick when W was around.

        And I'm pretty sure if you take the time to check the Reason archives you'll find that there were more than enough posts slamming GW for his policies too.

      2. Paul   13 years ago

        Will we be that much more free under Mittens or the Newter?

        No. Welcome to libertarianism!

        1. RZR   13 years ago

          Heh. Glad I could make it.

          I began reading up on libertarianism shortly after pulling the elephant lever in 2000. What's so frustrating about all this is that I vividly recall thinking things would pick up with Little Boots out of office. We saw how that turned out. This time, I just can't get that excited about simply putting the other assholes back in charge.

          1. Joshua   13 years ago

            I would not describe the reason commentariat as excited about the proposition of putting a Republicrat in charge. More of a moreseness I would guess.

            The only excitement I detect in the libertosphere is about the fact that thousands of people are really voting for a candidate who espouses freedom, and this message seems to be gaining traction.

            As far as I can tell, libertariana is fully prepared to be completely disappointed in whomsoever takes the reins of office in 2013.

            It's what we do!

  3. rather   13 years ago

    The minimum tax for overseas American business is the untold story of the SOTO; unless enterprise can find a loophole, it will be effective

    1. poetry   13 years ago

      one time i was eating ice cream on the porch and i felt this lick lick lick on my foot and i thought it was just my dog but when i looked down it was this weird guy who did that a lot

  4. Private Idaho   13 years ago

    SOTU barada nikto!

  5. P Brooks   13 years ago

    When will the Democrats rehabilitate Nixon, and build a gigantic monument to him on the Mall?

    Wage and price controls, untethered fiat money, vast new regulatory schemes (EPA), cynical obsessive aggrandizement of power to the Executive, what's not to love?

    1. Paul   13 years ago

      Crap, I ran across a website yesterday where some liberal was barking about "Even Nixon said such-and-such..."

      I'll never find it again.

  6. Shorter Cato Institute   13 years ago

    http://blogs.mcall.com/.a/6a00.....970b-800wi

  7. Dick Fitzwell   13 years ago

    It's time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas.

    Damn straight! Nobody should be given special treatment for using foreign labor...wait. What the fuck did he say?!?

  8. Clouseau   13 years ago

    CATO!!!! CANCEL THE ATTACK ORDERS FOR TONIGHT!

  9. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

    The bullshit needs to stop.

  10. Joe M   13 years ago

    Watching the alternating between Obama's bullshit and the takedowns made it almost tolerable to watch his bullshit in the first place. Even drinking, there's no way I could've handled it live.

    1. Paul   13 years ago

      Suderman was on fire during the livetweet. Gillespie was getting in a few good overhand rights. Cavanaugh was fairly staid.

  11. RZR   13 years ago

    Oh, hey! What's going on with that Tea Party these days?

    http://youtu.be/IUIryCYqHCo

    Not the nightmare it could've been!

  12. Angelina   13 years ago

    Thanks for the sharing of such information we will pass it on to our readers.
    Thanks for sharing knowledge..
    Sample Survey Questionnaire

  13. Nike online   13 years ago

    It's how I get bait.QBStimPL4

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court

Autumn Billings | 6.5.2025 3:05 PM

Nathan Fielder's 737 Stunt Involved Elaborate Workaround of Ridiculous 1,500-Hour Rule

Christian Britschgi | 6.5.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!