Obama, President of Debt
The federal government could hit its legal debt limit again right before this year's presidential election, according to Reuters:
The latest $1.2 trillion increase in the U.S. debt limit may not last through November's election and could provide fresh ammunition for Republicans to attack President Barack Obama on what they see as a particularly vulnerable point - spending.
Based on current deficit rates and borrowing estimates, some analysts say the United States could reach the debt ceiling again before the November 6 vote. This would force the U.S. Treasury to turn once more to accounting maneuvers to avoid the unthinkable: asking Congress for another increase as the presidential election campaign reaches its crescendo.
What's the president's plan to deal with the nation's mounting, unsustainable debt? Keep piling it on. Via Economics 21, a look back at how the Congressional Budget Office scored President Obama's 2012 budget proposal:
Here's what the CBO thinks the future would hold if the president's budget proposal was enacted, as summarized by the folks at E21:
Deficits over the next two years. If the President's proposals were enacted, the federal government would record deficits of $1.4 trillion in 2011 and $1.2 trillion in 2012. Those deficits would amount to 9.5 percent and 7.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), respectively. (By comparison, the deficit in 2010 totaled 8.9 percent of GDP.)
Deficits over the next 10 years. The deficit under the President's proposals would fall to 4.1 percent of GDP by 2015 but would generally rise thereafter. Compared with CBO's current-law baseline projections, deficits under the proposals would be higher. By 2021, the deficit would reach 4.9 percent of GDP, compared with 3.1 percent under CBO's baseline projections. Over the 2012–2021 period, deficits under the President's budget would total $9.5 trillion, compared with $6.7 trillion under those baseline projections.
Comparison with the Administration's Estimates. CBO's estimate of the deficit for 2011 under the President's budget is $220 billion less that the Administration's figure, mostly because of lower estimates of outlays. In contrast, largely because of lower projections of revenues, CBO's estimate of cumulative deficits over the 2012–2021 period is $2.3 trillion greater than the Administration's.
Debt. Under the President's budget, debt held by the public would grow from $10.4 trillion (69 percent of GDP) at the end of 2011 to $20.8 trillion (87 percent of GDP) at the end of 2021, about $2.8 trillion more than the amount in CBO's baseline projections.
That is to say: the Obama Administration's record on the short-term fiscal balance is as poor as their record on the long-run fiscal challenge. The CBO projects that the Administration's budget will result in steadily rising debts and deficits as far as the eye can see — and that's based on the assumption that the economy will run into no future recessions.
As I wrote last year when the CBO's assessment of the White House budget plan was first released, the president's budget is built on what you might call the rosy scenario system—a sort of cross-your-fingers-and-hope-nothing-goes-wrong approach to budgeting. What's worse is that under the president's plan, all those rosy scenarios will only barely keep us afloat; even if nothing goes wrong, and the economy chugs along at an unlikely pace, the country's fundamental fiscal problems won't be resolved.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is everybody at Reason trying to make quota at the end of the week?
They do this every Friday.
He's only an irresponsible spendthrift because you are all RACISS!
Spoof, but not a bad one.
The real tony would have spelled Racists correctly. And worked "externalities" into the sentence.
No, EXTERNALITIES!!11!!1one11!! is mine, bitch.
ARFARFARFARFARFARFARFARF!!!!!!!!!!!
Watch it, your title comes dangerously close to infringing on my intellectual property.
So where did you get the "Debt" Obama poster? I made one just like that somem time ago.... No accusations, it was super easy, just wondering....
Reason has a keylogger and haxes your computer... regularly. By order of the Koch Bros.
Those votes won't buy themselves.
Worst. Alt-text. Ever.
Remember the "Office of the President Elect"?
That was worse.
The only possible conclusion is that politicians care nothing for what's best for America and have figured out a way to make us OK with that.
It's called partisanship. Enough people are partisan enough to excuse their TEAM for caring nothing about the country or the future that the politicians can basically do whatever they want.
It's repulsive, but that's what we have.
Yet somehow the leading advocates against partisanship are the simpletons whose solution is always more spending, as Reason noted a few months ago.
Bipartisanship is still partisanship, it's just that everyone agrees on the particular way they'd like to fuck us, even if their motivations remain different.
Hardly inconceivable, if you buy the line that the parties are each rooted in some group of consistent, coherent, guiding principles. Which, of course, they aren't.
Roughly 100% of the time, declaring oneself to be nonpartisan is a heavily partisan act aimed at setting the tone of the debate by smearing opposing viewpoints as "extreme" and "unreasonable".
Also, when I hear the words "post-ideological" I reach for my wallet.
I, like Goering with the word "culture", reach for my Browning.