L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa: Kill Redevelopment Agency Dead
California's rapid unwinding of its toxic redevelopment agencies is creating opportunities for reform of city corruption. To his credit, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is seizing one opportunity: He is urging City Council members to liquidate the Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles (CRA/LA) and walk away from the money-losing real estate swindles the agency has created and exacerbated.
The council is voting on whether or not to become the CRA/LA's "successor agency." Villraigosa is urging the city to decline that role and just roll the redevelopment agency up.
David Zahniser of the Los Angeles Times is covering this story nicely, with a fact-rich co-bylined print piece and a follow-up from today's council deliberations, which have been struck by thugs and lobbyists trying to keep the corporatist agency alive. (Various state politicians are trying to sneak through legislation to the same effect.)
Madeline Janis, a CRA/LA board member, tells the council: "You've got $400 million worth of projects in the pipeline already. This is your legacy. This is the mayor's legacy."
In the world of honest business, they say your first loss is usually your smallest. Janis doesn't know that, but even L.A. politicians must face up to the truth that there are no more dollars to flush down this hole.
I'll have more on the redevdammerung in an upcoming print edition of Reason. (Subscribe!) In the meantime, check out the pride of CRA/LA, the Marlton Square Development:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I dont know what to say. Has Villar become irrelevant or are the CRAs completely doomed? I cant believe he's on the side of axing the CRA. It does however make me want to do a little dance.
Easy money doesn't go easily.
This is going to be akin to fighting the mafia. I'm guessing getting rid of this CRA and every new child agency that spawns from it, billing itself as something different, will be very hard to kill.
Gift-based urban planning is a powerful tool for municipalities to let go of.
My sister has a
longchamp and she likes the Longchamp Bag very much. When people ask
her why she likes her sac longchamp Bag so much, she just answers like that thee is no reason and
because she likes my Longchamp Bag, so she likes it.