Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Americans Reluctant to Extend Unemployment Benefits to 99 Weeks, Open to 52 Weeks

Emily Ekins | 12.21.2011 4:47 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

At the end of December, Congress will determine whether to continue extending unemployment benefits beyond 26 weeks (about 6 months) to 99 weeks (about 23 months).

As of November 2011, national unemployment stood at 8.6 percent; nearly half have been unemployed for 27 weeks or more. (See BLS estimates for unemployment). States typically provide up to 26 weeks' worth of unemployment benefits, and the federal government has provided the extension up to 99 weeks. (For more discussion click here.)

The December 2011 Reason-Rupe poll asked 1,200 Americans on both landline and mobile phones how long they thought unemployment benefits should be. About a third of Americans prefer the states' six month limit, and about another third believe it should extend seven months to 18 months. A little less than a quarter believe benefits should extend 99 weeks or more. In the sum, the majority (60 percent) reaches consensus at about one year or less. This means that Congress would probably get the most support for extending unemployment benefits to 52 weeks, rather than 99 weeks.

To better understand what Americans think about unemployment, the poll asked whether they thought those unemployed over a year were trying hard to find jobs but couldn't, or if they could find jobs if they wanted to. Americans are divided, with 48 percent believing those unemployed over a year are trying hard to find jobs and 44 percent believing the unemployed could find jobs if they wanted to. 

When somebody loses their job, for how many months should they receive unemployment benefits? (OPEN-ENDED)

 

Find full Reason-Rupe Q4 2011 poll results, question wording, and methodology here.

The Reason-Rupe Q4 2011 poll collected a nationally representative sample of 1,200 respondents, aged 18 and older from all 50 states and the District of Columbia using live telephone interviews from December 1-13. Interviews were conducted on both landline and mobile phones. The margin of sampling error for this poll is +/- 3 percent.

Follow Emily Ekins on Twitter @emilyekins

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Gregory Conko and Henry Miller on the FDA vs. Doctors and Patients

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute.

PoliticsEconomicsCongressUnemployment Benefits
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (21)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Joe M   13 years ago

    The chart doesn’t match the prose very well.

    1. Y Szasz   13 years ago

      But the carpet matches the drapes!

  2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

    No alt-text? And after I complimented you in the video. What nerve!

    1. Paul   13 years ago

      Ekins doesn’t do alt-text. If you watch her video you’ll see why she’s so way above alt-text.

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        Ekins doesn’t do alt-text.

        Who the fuck do you think I am?

        1. Paul   13 years ago

          Someone who likes him some alt-text?

  3. Paul   13 years ago

    Wait wait wait wait… the news (NPR) is all a-twitter about how employment is surging back. Green shoots and jobs from every limb!

    Everyone is hiring. Happy days are here again! The stimulus worked! The Stimulus dead-enders can suck it!

    1. sage   13 years ago

      Does that mean I can stop worrying about getting curb stomped?

  4. protefeed   13 years ago

    Lowering the high unemployment rate by paying people to stay unemployed, while refusing to end a minimum wage which prohibits employers and employees from engaging in employment — what could possibly go wrong with that fine plan?

  5. Hazel Meade   13 years ago

    Question here. My understanding is that (in the current bill) they are talking about extending “long term” unemployment benefits, which I take to mean to the same people who got such an extension last spring, and the year before that. I’m assuming this is supposed to be a temporary recession-fighting measure … due to the supposed stimulus benefits of paying people who are out of work.

    Am I mixed up about something or is the current bill not about extending benefits to people who have already been unemployed for more than a year?

    1. Paul   13 years ago

      I’ts my understanding that they’re trying to extend the extensions on previous unemployment benefit extensions.

      1. Hazel Meade   13 years ago

        Which they don’t have to budget for because it’s “temporary” and therefore will expire when the extension expires, right?

  6. Grace Onderpresher   13 years ago

    If someone loses their job and it’s not their fault, they should be entitled to unemployment benefits as long as they are unemployed. We Americans take care of our own!

    1. Gojira   13 years ago

      C. Too simplistic, but I do give you credit for not going hysterical with hyperbole.

      1. Grace Onderpresher   13 years ago

        Curses, foiled again!

  7. unemployed long time   13 years ago

    That’s me, the guy who won’t — shit, I mean can’t — find a job. So I head on down to the unemployment office and give ’em the Goodfellas routine.

    I can’t get a job? Fuck you, pay me.

    I can’t prove I’ve even been looking? Fuck you, pay me.

    It’s been 2 years already, what the hell have I been doing other than surfing the web at Starbucks? Fuck you, pay me.

    The government is out of money? Fuck you, pay me.

    1. Public Sector Union   13 years ago

      The government is out of money? Fuck you, pay me.

      I agree!

  8. Dustin Whitedeen   13 years ago

    Oh wow, very cool indeed. I liek the sounds of that.

    http://www.real-web-privacy.tk

  9. edwinaquiroz   13 years ago

    Unemployment numbers are comprised of those that are in the job market for the past 30 days. It does not include those that have not been in the job market in the last 30 days: people who have given up looking; those that have gone off unemployment because it has run out. One solution to unemployment is High Speed Universities check it out

  10. mike   13 years ago

    i was a13 year loss prevention specialist until march and was laid off from lack of work,budget cuts with 468 others,this was not my doing and i shouldn’t have to be crucified for it,you think UE is a jackpot ? i make 3 times less than i did working,every penny goes to ,rent,bills and very little for food.my landlord is already talking eviction,its not very fun..I cannot be expected to go from $14 per hour to $7.50 washing tables,i dont do drugs or drink.I think they should drug test all on UE benefits,if you fail or dont show up you lose your benefits,if you pass you get the 99 weeks.I have applications everywhere and its very tough with 50-100 others seeking the same job as you.If they do not pass it..its going be a 3 ring circus and it will get out of hand..

  11. bobby horkman   13 years ago

    Many folks have paid in a lot more than they will ever receive,oh, btw nice job cursing,people !

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!