Reason Writers at the Movies: Peter Suderman Reviews Lars von Trier's Melancholia
Associate Editor Peter Suderman reviews Lars von Trier's Melancholia in today's Washington Times:
It's the end of the world as we know it, and Lars von Trier feels … well, depressed.
That's not an entirely unusual state for Mr. von Trier, the cinematic provocateur whose highly stylized indie film spectacles — including such acts of big-screen cruelty as "Antichrist" and "Dogville" — have plumbed the depths of human depravity.
His latest, "Melancholia," is a film about the spectacular destruction of the Earth — before the end of the first reel, a long-hidden planet sneaks out from behind the sun and blows the whole planet to bits. It's a disaster movie of sorts, like "2012" for the Euro-friendly art-house set.
The difference is that the destruction that has Mr. von Trier down is on a much smaller scale than any Hollywood blockbuster. With "Melancholia," he offers a gorgeous, self-serving lament about the general miserableness of everything — marriage, family, work, advertising, wealth, capitalism and human relationships in general. It's a movie only people who hate everything can love.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
…it must be pretty good.
…blesses you. But he sold it to even craziers in 2010, I think.
+2 for me!
Dammit, reply to FoE. Never mind.
Episiarch wins the clusterfuck.
Obviously.
+1 for me
Melancholia are the things that give Jedi their powers right?
Why is this movie referencing them?
The “planet” that destroys the Earth. . .well, let’s just say that it’s no moon.
Isn’t there a golden age of scifi series about a second earth behind the sun?
Like by Burroughs or something?
Probably. I remember a movie about that, too.
Journey to the farside of the sun? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064519/
That’s it! Now find the one where another moon is somehow created by shooting rockets into the ground.
You could be thinking of the Gor series, by John Norman. Not golden age, they started in the 60’s.
That is what I was thinking….somehow I mixed Gor up with John Carter.
No moonies?
+1 more for me!
Ah, crap, that was a reply to ProL. Never mind.
Huh?
The rectal Moonie post was a reply to you. You get the point.
Oh, I see. I thought you’d lost your mind for a moment.
Melancholia was Morticia’s sister.
Ooops, she was Morticia’s cousin. Ophelia was her sister.
including such acts of big-screen cruelty as “Antichrist” and “Dogville”
I liked dogville…it was strangely anti-left wing.
Also breaking the waves was good.
One thing I love about von Trier is that he pretty much founded Dogma 95 and then every film he made after signing up to it broke every rule it had. Pure awesome.
The Dogma 95 crew actually produced some good stuff. I really liked The Celebration.
Von Trier is a talented guy but I find his stuff to always be trying too hard.
The Celebration was pretty awesome.
Von Trier is a talented guy but I find his stuff to always be trying too hard.
Do you find his style to be trying?
I find your pathetic attempts at puns to be very trying, yes. You remind me of ProL, but when he’s high on goofballs.
Pre-law, pre-med, what’s the difference?
Well, one of you sues and the other gets sued.
That’s an urban legend. Legally, there’s no distinction.
You remind me of ProL, but when he’s high on goofballs.
Fool! Who do you think gave them to…
Oops! Hi HIPAA!
Doc, if you’re handing out the fun drugs, add me to your list.
He’s not as bad as Gus van Sant.
That is all.
So he took When Worlds Collide and fagged it up as much as humanly possible, then?
Wait, the planetoid rides a loud Harley? I’m confused. How could it sneak up on the Earth being that loud and obnoxious?
Apparently Spielberg is producing an adaptation of that book with Stephen Sommers (GI Joe and Mummy movies) directing to be released in 2012.
What, no Michael Bay?
Blowing up the earth is not enough explosions for Michael Bay. He’ll only deal with solar systems or bigger.
I just Lucas, in a surprise announcement, say that Bay is directing a sequel to Star Wars!
I just heard Lucas, that is.
Uwe Boll could probably do a better job than Lucas did with The Clone Wars.
OK, maybe not. But it would be close.
It would be an improvement to the prequels if he redid them.
Another bonus that Van Trier gave to the world is that after Bork worked with him on Dancer in the Dark she said she would never be in a another film ever.
That alone is good reason to buy a ticket to his films…even if you don’t watch them.
It looking like Adamn Sandler just made one of the worst movies of all time judging by Rotten Tomatoes.
This review snippet is brutal:
“It is indeed every bit as lousy as it looks. So kudos to the marketing department, I guess. They nailed this one.”
I swear he’s clowning everyone with this movie. He probably said “I am going to make the stupidest, worst movie possible and I’ll still make money. Watch me.”
South Park did it.
Um…okay, how about this: Adam Sandler is like in love with some girl. But it turns out that the girl is actually a golden retriever…or something.
That’s a little artsy and highbrow for Sandler.
It looking like Adamn Sandler just made one of the worst movies of all time
There you go.
What you aren’t going to correct “It’s” as well? Amateur hour.
But seriously, there are other movies out there that are god awful. I’ll never be able to rank them however because I would never see anything ranked that low on RT.
But I still laugh at the Waterboy
And it’s still going to be #1 this weekend.
But, but Armond White loved Jack and Jill!
Oh, wait, you’re right. That does mean it’s awful.
But seriously, White’s review is almost self-parody: http://cityarts.info/2011/11/1…..ty-sandler‘s-jack-jill-and-tyler-perry/
Is that a joke?
Armond White’s review a joke? Never intentionally.
If I want to watch human depravity I’ll just watch Penn State tomorrow.
I rather liked The Antichrist. It’s the sort of film Camille Paglia would make if she made movies and still wrote about anything other than how awesome she is.
I’m still waiting on this years Black Swan, it wasn’t the best movie ever (or for the year, King’s Speech was deserving) but I have rarely been as spellbound by a movie as that one. Was edge-of-your-seat intense.
Still haven’t watched Black Swan, the wife hates the nudie stuff. She’s badgering me to watch Julie and Julia.
Go see Drive. It’s worth it.
It has the nudie stuff.
Though a bunch of naked women paralyzed in fear as the main character threatens to pound a bullet into some gangsters skull with a ball-peen hammer may not considered nudie stuff….
But yeah I liked the movie as well.
I like the sound of that.
I fucking missed that scene because I had to piss. I’m still pissed off about that, but it just gives me an excuse to watch it again.
Ever seen any Beat Takeshi films?
Drive reminds me of those movies. Domestic quiet moments punctuated by sudden and shrieking violence.
Looks good, but my inner sparkly vamp says Breaking Dawn.
Who am i kidding, I can’t even pretend to want to see that emo shit
I’m pulling for Team Wooden Stake and Team Holy Water in that one.
“the wife hates the nudie stuff”
And yet you married her….
This movie strikes me as self important crap. I haven’t seen it, but I’m certainly not going to shell out bucks for it. Wait for Netflix.
Why wait? Just steal it with the help of pirates bay.
I can see it now. SWAT team busting down my door, shooting my dogs, terrorizing my kids, because I had bittorrent running half the night retrieving a shitty movie I didn’t really want to see anyway.
But stealing’s wrong.
Not if you redefine theft.
This sounds awesome. I’m going to rent this as soon as I get some cash together and pay my electric bill. Can’t wait to watch some capitalist pricks bite it!
Do non-capitalist have some sort of magic shield that would protect them during the destruction of the planet?
WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU OVER ALL THE DRUMMING. SHIT, IS THAT GUY OVER THERE DEAD? DON’T LET THE PRESS SEE THAT, PEOPLE! SORRY MAN, GOT TO GO!
With “Melancholia,” he offers a gorgeous, self-serving lament about the general miserableness of everything ? marriage, family, work, advertising, wealth, capitalism and human relationships in general. It’s a movie only people who hate everything can love.
In other words, it’s the same nihilistic wank-fest as “American Beauty,” minus Mena Suvari’s boobs.
It’s a movie only people who hate everything can love.
He made a movie expressly for Episiarch?
It’s a movie only people who hate everything can love…that’s the sort of paradoxical line that G.K. Chesterton would write if he was stoned out of his gourd.
Does Kirsten show her tits??? That’s all I really care about.
Yes!
I think there are other parts of the movie though.
yes…
a lot
“You’re right, but I said *not even* if you were the last man on earth!”
Such a movie by itself would be enough to justify our urban civilization, if it wasn’t already justified for so many other reasons.
A lot of the things you say is astonishingly precise and that makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light before. Your piece really did turn the light on for me as far as this subject matter goes. Nevertheless at this time there is actually one factor I am not necessarily too comfy with so whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the core theme of the point, permit me see what the rest of the visitors have to point out.Very well done.