Paranormal Activity 3
Halloween begins.
The late-night screening of this movie that I attended kicked off with a whoop of promotional activity: hip-hop DJs, Xbox giveaways, a giddy appearance by the film's two directors (one of them sporting a fake knife through his head). None of this was necessary. As with most horror franchises, the audience for the Paranormal Activity films is pre-sold. But where fans of the Saw or Hostel pictures come for the gore and torment, the PA crowd is drawn by the straightforward shocks and thrills of old-fashioned haunted-house movies. Given the series' constricting premise—that what we're seeing is "found footage," and thus must consist entirely of POV shots—it's remarkable that the films haven't collapsed into witless repetition. But they haven't, quite. Paranormal Activity 3 actually is a scary movie.
While last year's Paranormal Activity 2 was a prequel of sorts, set a few months before the events in the original film (which likewise took place in 2006), this new one goes back much farther. First, though, it reacquaints us with Katie (Katie Featherston) and Kristi (Sprague Grayden), the two sisters from the previous movies. Katie has come to Kristi's pre-horror home with a box of old VHS tapes from their childhood, which neither of them has ever watched. When the tapes mysteriously disappear, we relocate to 1988, when the sisters were little girls (played by Chloe Csengery and Jessica Tyler Brown) living with their single mom, Julie (Lauren Bittner), and her boyfriend Dennis (Christopher Nicholas Smith) in a big house in Carlsbad, California.
Fortuitously, Dennis is a wedding videographer, with a goodly stock of cameras and a complete tape-editing setup at his disposal. One night he suggests to Julie that they make a sex tape. She agrees, and they're almost sort of getting down to it when the whole house begins to shake, and they must flee. The sex-tape camera remains behind, of course, and in the shower of dust drifting down from the room's cracked ceiling, we see the outline of a spectral figure. When Dennis sees it, too, on an editing monitor the following day, he decides to set up video cameras around the house. An excellent idea, of course.
The directors, Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman (whose first feature was the 2010 documentary Catfish), bring a fresh enthusiasm to this PA installment. They happily pile on cheap fake-outs in the beginning—characters suddenly popping up in the cameras' viewfinders, or leaping out of closets in rubbery monster masks (just joking!). They even make use of that ancient kiddie fright-night staple, the spooky figure shrouded in a sheet. But then they get more inventive.
Characters are yanked up into the air or smacked around by unseen forces; spines are snapped (a snazzy effect); and in one startling scene Julie enters a room to find that all of its furnishings—present just moments before—have suddenly vanished. (Then comes the startling part.) There's a book on demonology, an eruption of pentagrams, a luckless babysitter (Johanna Braddy) who's not being paid enough for the things she has to endure, and a kindly grandmother (Hallie Foote) who's not really all that helpful.
The ending is appropriately spooky, even if it doesn't hook up seamlessly with the subsequent events in the story which we know to follow in PA2. Will the series have to continue prequelling back ever deeper into the past? Finally winding up where? The Salem witch trials, maybe?
Kurt Loder is a writer living in New York. His third book, a collection of film reviews called The Good, the Bad and the Godawful, will be out on November 8th from St. Martin's Press. Follow him on Twitter at kurt_loder.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am sick of the shaky cam shit.
I'm sure there's a way to draw that into a joke regarding the shakey footage of Ghadaffi earlier today, but I'm drawing a blank.
how about the voice of Reagan mimicking the creepy voice that was chasing the Priest around the house in the original Amityville Horror movie. only this time the voice is chasing Quakdaffy around one of his palaces. "GET OUT! GET OUT!"
Most "found footage" stuff is crap--most particularly, Blair Witch--but REC and its sequel, REC 2, are quite good. Of course, they are all based on the first and foremost one.
Picked up that dvd just a few months ago. Delicious. The director actually had to go to court to prove that he didn't kill that chick during the impalement scene.
I met Ruggero Deodato once. He's really short, and he must have been 50 or so, but he had his 20-year-old Italian girlfriend (not bad looking, either) with him. Good job, Ruggero. Use that cult fame to your advantage. I think she was even slightly taller than him.
You are of course referring to the Spanish version and not the fraudulent shot-for-shot rip off American version right?
Of course. I'm insulted by the question. Asshole.
The remake isn't called REC, it's called Quarantine. No, I haven't seen it.
Fucking timestamps. I swear I was typing while you were.
I win!
What do I win?
A "Yes We Can" tee shirt.
BTW: I've got a marketing idea. A teeshirt with the iconic image of Barack Obama with "No you diunt" as the caption.
NO YOU DIDN'T
My bad on the remake name, and to be honest, had I realized it was you that brought the film up, I most certainly wouldn't have even needed that clarification. As much of a cunt as you are, you are a discerning movie-goer, and I can respect that.
Speaking of which, any recommendations on the horror/scary front that may be obscure or dated that a young buck like myself could benefit from? Always like getting a few in around this time of year (I've thought about Cannibal Holocaust, but need to wait until the wife goes out of town for that or else she'll think I'm genuinely possessed).
Audition. I'm not responsible for the rape shower you're going to want after watching it.
Thanks. Added via Netflix queue.
You need to come back and tell me what you thought.
some years after I watched it and tried to purge the... sense of unease it gave me, I saw a VH1 retrospective on the top 100 horror movies of all times. It ended up as something like #17 with Rob fucking Zombie saying that it was one of the more fucked up experiences he'd ever witnessed on film.
You know, it didn't bother me that much.
Imprint, that Takashi Miike did for the Masters of Horror series, bothered me more.
I'm pretty sure that there's a Takashi Miike film out there that will bother us for each of us.
Oh, also: Battle Royale.
Where the fuck is dbcooper?
Battle Royale was a rare case where I read the book first, and then stumbled across the movie accidentally a couple of years later. Like in I didn't know they made a movie about it until I was describing the book to someone.
The film wasn't promoted in the States at all, so no surprise there.
God damn, that movie is awesome. I love it.
The Beyond, The New York Ripper, and Antropophagus are some great foreign ones people usually miss.
All the Lovecraft adaptations with Jeffrey Coombs in them (From Beyond, Re-Animator) are good too.
And I can't believe I failed to mention David Cronenberg in my other post. All his work is good, but you must start with The Brood, Scanners, Videodrome, The Dead Zone, Dead Ringers, and maybe Rabid.
Cronenberg's themes of mutation and organic perversity are fucking amazing.
"Long live the new flesh."
Oh, and I almost forgot the classic: Maniac.
And don't forget Maniac Cop. Man, I love Larry Cohen.
Did you care for his Naked Lunch? Some scenes stick even if the movie was drawn out to the point of distraction.
I liked it. The book was unadaptable, but the movie largely works.
visitor q is miike at his funny/awful best.
"this isn't a miracle...it's shit!"
"...i will call it...true bullying."
the cronenberg version of naked lunch is really great.
Discerning?!?
Let me think of some suggestions here. I'd link them for you, but H&R now only allows two links, so you'll have to look them up yourself.
Paul is correct about Audition; it is a Takashi Miike film and therefore awesome. Ichi the Killer is another good one by him.
Check out Dario Argento's work up to and including Two Evil Eyes; you can forget about the stuff after that.
Check out all of George Romero's work up to and including The Dark Half; after that, you're going to be disappointed.
Check out all of Peter Jackson's early work, especially Braindead/Dead Alive.
You might want to check out the genre known as giallo ("yellow" in Italian), which will expose you to Lucio Fulci, Mario Bava, Michele Soavi, and bunch of others.
Those were all giallo films that I listed above; glad somebody else thought to include the name of the genre. Nobody does late 70s/early 80s exploitation horror quite like the Italians.
The Spanish Blind Dead films are decent, also. Well, the first two are.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.....Blind_Dead
And Let Sleeping Corpses Lie was at least a joint Spanish/Italian piece.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....rpses_Lie_(film)
Yes. I own Sleeping Corpses, actually.
Also, I highly recommend anything by Hammer or Amicus.
Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed! fucking rocks.
Those old Hammer films filled up my youth. Replayed endlessly on late-night cable.
There's few things I love more than an obscure horror films circle-jerk discussion. I'm going to go home and watch Suspiria now.
Agreed about Miike; he's a great director. Audition is an awesome film that happens to be a horror film. Since I haven't seen it mentioned, I also liked Visitor Q, although he couldn't get around the fact it had a made-for-video budget.
Including Bad Taste? *snickers*
Also, since you brought up Battle Royale, Fukasaku made a lot of good yakuza films before that, for anyone who likes yakuza / mob flicks.
To be honest, I hate Ichi the Killer. Absolutely just hate it. It's crime is that described by Peter Griffin when he complained about the Godfather. It insist upon itself.
Huh? Chris Griffin?
Nah. My name is a double super secret cover because I'm related to a regular on the board but prefer that party did not know.
What? You're related to me?
If you guys knew who it was, you'd run me out of here. She is that -- oops, almost gave it away!
I like early Guillermo del Toro, Cronos and Devil's Backbone were both great.
Can't think of the title...
Great movie. Monk on quest to stop the anti-christ. Burns his feet to keep from being possessed. I want to say Spanish or Italian...fairly low budget, great production and cast...Dang...drawing a blank. Horror/but not really.
I actually prefer Quarantine.
Blair Witch was awesome! Now, Cloverfield? So much potential ruined so completely...
I liked it. But I saw it before all the hype.
You talking about Coverfield? My problem with it was that it was a great concept done well but presented in a completely implausible way. And once the main characters begin to annoy, the movie's over for me.
o much potential ruined so completely...
I concur. Great idea for a movie.
Worst possible execution.
but REC and its sequel
Wait, I just read the synopsis of REC... did they do an American remake called... I dunno, Quarrantine or something? I didn't even get through that movie.
Yeah, here it is.
REC and its sequel, REC 2, are quite good
The pre-first-scare setups and the final events (what happens after what they're looking for/avoiding is shown) are terrible. But you could make one awesome movie out of both of them.
Is that what the "fan edit" that's out there does? None of the torrents of it work for me.
One of the things I liked the most was that they found a (very) plausible reason to be holding the camera all the way to the very end. Other found footage stuff is rife with moments where you go "why the fuck are you still holding the camera when [insert monster here] is chasing you?!?"
I agree, even with the 'found footage' movies I did like. The one that went completely off the rails in that regard for me was Cloverfield.
I haven't watched any of the Paranormal movies after the first one. I thought the first one was effective and creepy, while at the same time wishing the annoying couple in the movie would be killed as soon as possible.
Are they both in two and three?
Blair Witch didn't cut it for a lot of people. Especially that whole "imagination required" thing. But then a lot of horror fans have grown viewing horror movies as being a sort of rollercoaster/funhouse ride where the primary intention is to make you jump, or feel some momentary fright in response to some sort of stimuli. Like a rollercoaster, or a gunshot, bursting ballon, air turbulence, etc. The things that scare me most are those that leave me with a sense of unease and fright that lasts for days, and are usually based off scenes where I was forced to use my imagination.
Hey!
funhouse ride where the primary intention is to make you jump, or feel some momentary fright in response to some sort of stimuli. Like a rollercoaster, or a gunshot, bursting ballon, air turbulence, etc. The
By the way, we call those "cat scares". And it's ok to use it once or maybe twice in a horror film, but I agree, the best films give you that sense of unease. It's a lost art.
I agree completely. I pretty much gave up on horror films for a long while, simply because I got so sick of the BOO!! moments.
Alien, The Thing and Ringu are all very disquieting in my opinion. Obvious choices, but hey.
I agree, to an extent. Although, I do rather enjoy the occassional jump/adrenaline rush scare, but the lingering paranoia is the most profound aspect of a truly good horror. Far worse to me than the appeal to the adrenaline rush is the appeal to the raw gruesome and gory instincts. Gore can be done tastefully, but a movie like Hostel had no lingering scare/paranoia and virtually no "jump outta your seat moments." Same with Saw to an extent. Can't get into those myself.
I have a story about how The Ring actually scared the living shit out of me (was alone when watching it, had just moved into the apartment and didn't have cable, and had a chair sitting right in front of the TV in my room since I used it as a gaming station... turned over in my sleep onto my remote and the TV turned on to white noise with the chair sitting eerily in front of it just like the video, I doubt the movie was actually that scary in the lingering effects of paranoia aspect, just that the situation that occurred that night was a uniquely coincidental one that freaked me out).
Ringu (original, Japanese version) or The Ring (Gore Verbinski version)?
The original is fucking scary as hell. And I had someone call me literally right after turning the movie off. I jumped.
Sadly, the Gore Verbanski version. I was younger then, and hadn't realized that one should watch the original Japanese made versions first. Considering how terrified I was after the watered down American version, I can only imagine the horror that I would've been in had I watched the Japanese original since my neighbors at the time were Asian engineering exchange students (hell, most of the community was Asian, it was a in a town with a highly ranked college)
That's a shame. I saw the original, and a few months later was at a press screening of Verbinski's version (not because I was press; because I knew the right people). After it was over, only myself and one other person in the room had seen the original, and we start ranting about how it doesn't even compare, and all the journalists/reviewers start writing down everything we said because they hadn't seen the original either (another example of how fucking uninformed journalists are).
The Verbinski version isn't bad; it's just that the original scared me more than anything has scared me in a long, long time, and the coming-out-of-the-TV is done completely head-on in Ringu and you just absolutely do not expect it and it's just...wow. It's a complete order of magnitude scarier when done that way, and I have no idea why Verbinski chose to switch to the side shot, because as soon as he does, you know something's coming out of that TV before it comes out. In the original it's such a complete surprise that it floors you.
God damn that movie is creepy.
Ringu (original, Japanese version) or The Ring (Gore Verbinski version)?
I found both to be rather dull and very, very unscary.
That ghost girl creeps the crap out of me for some reason.
Saw and Hostel weren't horror. They were torture porn. The entire genre doesn't leave me afraid so much as pi**ed off.
The original The Haunting is a great example of this. There's no gore, and hardly even any special effects. But it's a wonderfully creepy film.
I agree. I saw it last year at the theater; there was an older guy there who looked just like Russ Tamblin, dressed up as Dr. Jacobi from Twin Peaks.
Are you sure it wasn't Russ Tamblyn?
All those J-horor movies scared me (mostly Ju-On). I saw the American version of the Ring first, and the weird videotape of the girl schlumping up out of that well scared the crap out of me. Gawd in heaven.
Torture porn disturbs me in the same manner that pictures of dead children in Iraq do. I can't stand that stuff. I like supernatural stuff more than human on human horror. The latter is real and you can see it on the news anytime.
Some other good J-horror:
Kiyoshi Kurosawa's (no relation) Cure
Masayuki Ochiai's Infection
Masaki Kobayashi's Kwaidan (a little older, but well directed.)
Also, I personally liked Hideo Nakata's Dark Water, but I've heard mixed comments from others.
I'm just the opposite. J-horror bores the hell out of me. I know there is no such thing as ghosts or an afterlife, so why would be scared of a depiction of one?
However, having lived in 3rd World Southeast Asia for more than a few years, I can wholly believe that a private club exists where bored rich folks pay to torture people to death.
Life is cheap.
I know there is no such thing as ghosts as well, but I don't let that stop me from being scared of the idea of them.
Movies like this always remind me of the Richard Pryor joke where he asks, Why can't you make a haunted house movie staring black people? His answer was that, because only white people are stupid enough to want to stay in a haunted house.
That was Eddie Murphy.
"I'm moving out of my house, I was watching movies like Poltergeist and Amityville Horror. Why don't the people just get the hell out of the house? ... You can't make a horror movie with black people in it 'cuz the movie'd stop, you'd see niggers runnin' down the street, the movie's over! ... That's the movie. You can't have a movie like that. See, white people, you all sit on the toilet, see blood in the toilet, and you all go get Ajax. ... Brothers won't sit on the toilet. ... Movie be just like this: [brother's voice] "Wow, baby, this is beautiful. We got chandelier hangin' up here, kids outside playin', it's a beautiful neighborhood, I really love - this is beaut--" [demonic whisper] "Get out!" [brother's voice] "Too bad we can't stay." [instantly spins, starts walking upstage]"
You are correct, Sir, my bad.
it's remarkable that the films haven't collapsed into witless repetition.
The first one sure did.
Man that movie sucked.
While it wasn't good, I didn't think it was bad, either. Decent genre fare.
frighting story..
imo, really good horror movies are the hardest to make. i can count on two hands the really good ones. it seems compared to actioners, comedies, etc. it's just a lot harder.
i like paranormal activity 1 and 2, and the 3rd one sounds good.
i wouldn't call them great , but they were good imnsho
trouble
Not to be a blog-whore -
The list of my fav horror movies
http://ofghostsandgunpowder.bl.....ovies.html
and my fav Hammer movies (not including Amicus).
http://ofghostsandgunpowder.bl.....films.html
Read my review: http://filmsponge.com/review-p.....-the-charm
I liked PA3, but it would have been more frightening if I hadn't seen the first one.
My only complaint was the "Last Exorcism" style ending, though it wasn't so bad as to ruin the entire movie (like Last Exorcism).