Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

What Cases Have the PATRIOT Act's Sneak-and-Peek Warrants Been Used For?

Jesse Walker | 9.7.2011 1:44 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Benjamin Wallace-Wells provides a useful chart (though it's limited, alas, to the years 2006-2009):

[Via Radley Balko.]

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Latinos Now Majority of Those Sentenced for Federal Felonies, Thanks to Immigration Crackdowns

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PolicyCivil LibertiesPatriot Act
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. tarran   14 years ago

    Alt-text fail:

    It's bale of marijuana. 😉

    1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

      I always heard it was a bowl.

    2. Jesse Walker   14 years ago

      It's bale of marijuana. 😉

      My only defense: It's natural to associate marijuana with bail, too...

    3. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

      Missed obvious marijuana bong/bomb wordplay. Check minus.

  2. heller   14 years ago

    *sigh*

  3. Martin   14 years ago

    There is no power you can grant government that they will not abuse.

    1. mr simple   14 years ago

      You should add:

      ~Benjamin Franklin

      to that quote to give it credibility. It will be quoted all over the Internet in about 12 hrs.

  4. Tim   14 years ago

    That's a really big twinkie.

  5. ls1z28chris   14 years ago

    No one ever could have predicted that the powers grabbed by the federal government in the wake of the terror attacks ten years ago would be instead directed towards the American people themselves in order to prosecute the war on drugs.

    Wait a second. Libertarians predicted this long before the PATRIOT Act was passed. I guess we're just a bunch of nutters.

    1. tarran   14 years ago

      One thing that was refreshing about the political theorists writing >150 years ago was the assumption that every power granted government would eventually be abused.

      It's so true that I think it deserving of inclusion in RC's pantheon of Iron Laws

  6. Virginia   14 years ago

    Liberals were committed enough to the bill that it took Texas Republican Dick Armey to insist that the new privileges of the Patriot Act would indeed sunset, unless the president asked for, and Congress approved, a reauthorization.

    kudos, Dick.

  7. TrickyVic   14 years ago

    Next time it's up for reauthroization, someone in Congress should attempt to add a for terrorism only clause to the law, and make a big stink about it. Not that it would pass, but it might put some people in an uncomfortable position of backing its use for general law enforcement. At lest get those folks on record.

    Yeah, I know. Not gonna happen.

    1. NoTalentAssclown   14 years ago

      Only problem with that is:

      Drugs come from cartels/gangs/tribal sects

      Cartels/gangs/tribal sects= terrorists

      Therefore, drugs=terrorist financing

      1. ##   14 years ago

        I remember that commercial! "If you use marijuana then you're financing terrorism."

        Okay, it's a stretch but how about this:

        Toilet paper comes from logging trees.

        Opposing logging = eco terrorists.

        Therefore wiping one's butt = fighting terrorism.

        1. Janet Napolitano   14 years ago

          That's not a stretch at all.

          We'll use it in the next commercial.

      2. AlmightyJB   14 years ago

        I heard a sheriff refer to kids knocking down mailboxes as terrorist because they were "terrorizing" the neighborhood. Thia was right after the patriot act was passed. I'm thinking "here we go". JUst like the commerce clause, what can't you use the patriot for? If I'm speeding I'm terrorizing the highways. etc etc

  8. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Hugs not jihads.

  9. Lost_In_Translation   14 years ago

    and...

  10. John Thacker   14 years ago

    The Patriot Act was mostly a Republican project at its origin, but it would have died long ago without the support of Democrats

    Of course, right back when it passed, Joe Biden was bragging that it was really his bill, the same as the kneejerk bill he brought up after the OKC bombing.

    1. John Thacker   14 years ago

      The New Republic has sent that article down the memory hole, but here are a few links.

  11. Jess Asken   14 years ago

    Jim Sensenbrenner, the bombastic, rotund Wisconsin Republican, leaned back in his chair and said his bill was called the USA Patriot Act. There were no conflicts with that; the name was in.

    However, the actual title of the act is an acronym (USA PATRIOT): Uniting (and) Strengthening America (by) Providing Appropriate Tools Required (to) Intercept (and) Obstruct Terrorism. Did Sensenbrenner came up with that on his own?

    1. Mr. Mark   14 years ago

      No.

      Instead, a tasking was created to the newly-formed Post-9/11 Acronyms and Clever Spellings Task Force, which was a government-private sector partnership initiated to improve the ability of the federal government to react to new terrorism challenges of the 21st century in the Scrabble domain of the textual-security paradigm. The long-form name developed for the USA Patriot Act was designed by an 820-person special working group within the task force that was empowered and equipped to deal with special [REDACTED] grammatical and dictional challenges such as [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and I didn't know that he played the violin. The project only ran $8.2 billion over the allocated budget.

  12. mickeywhite   14 years ago

    Marsha Blackburn Voted FOR:
    Omnibus Appropriations, Special Education, Global AIDS Initiative, Job Training, Unemployment Benefits, Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, Agriculture Appropriations, FY2004 Foreign Operations Appropriations, U.S.-Singapore Trade, U.S.-Chile Trade, Supplemental Spending for Iraq & Afghanistan, Flood Insurance Reauthorization , Prescription Drug Benefit, Child Nutrition Programs, Surface Transportation, Job Training and Worker Services, Agriculture Appropriations, Foreign Aid, Debt Limit Increase, Fiscal 2005 Omnibus Appropriations, Vocational/Technical Training, Supplemental Appropriations, UN "Reforms." Patriot Act Reauthorization, CAFTA, Katrina Hurricane-relief Appropriations, Head Start Funding, Line-item Rescission, Oman Trade Agreement, Military Tribunals, Electronic Surveillance, Head Start Funding, COPS Funding, Funding the REAL ID Act (National ID), Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, Thought Crimes "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, Peru Free Trade Agreement, Economic Stimulus, Farm Bill (Veto Override), Warrantless Searches, Employee Verification Program, Body Imaging Screening, Patriot Act extension., Supplemental Appropriations, Patriot Act Extension.
    Marsha Blackburn Voted AGAINST:
    Ban on UN Contributions, eliminate Millennium Challenge Account, WTO Withdrawal, UN Dues Decrease, Defunding the NAIS, Iran Military Operations defunding Iraq Troop Withdrawal, congress authorization of Iran Military Operations, Withdrawing U.S. Soldiers from Afghanistan, Libya Troop Withdrawal.

    Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.
    See her "blatantly unconstitutional" votes at :
    http://mickeywhite.blogspot.co.....votes.html
    Mickey

  13. jtuf   14 years ago

    UUUUUGgggg.

  14. Apogee   14 years ago

    Looks like a bunch of mission creeps.

    1. KDS   14 years ago

      Creeps is right!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!