Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Chart of the Day, Total Government Spending Edition

Matt Welch | 9.2.2011 3:43 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Just yesterday I found myself wishing for a chart showing combined spending for federal, state, and local governments as a share of GDP over time. Today, via Instapundit, I see that our friends at the Mercatus Center have hooked us up:

And wait! The news gets worse:

Today federal, state, and local expenditures as a share of GDP are back at the highs reached during World War II. This time, however, we are unlikely to see a swift decrease. Wartime expenditures on items like weaponry and salaries for conscripted soldiers were relatively easy to wind down. The bulk of current and future government spending is on entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. This variety of spending is nearly impossible to reduce in the near term.

Whole thing here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Wait, We Tried Austerity? And It Failed?

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsGovernment SpendingState Fiscal Crisis
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (35)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Katrina vanden Heuvel   14 years ago

    Oh the Austerity!

    1. R C Dean   14 years ago

      Beat me to it, Kat van H.

      1. Trespassers W   14 years ago

        I was about to say something equally clever. Probably more clever. Now you'll never know. *runs away sobbing*

  2. Rrabbit   14 years ago

    Something might be missing from those percentages - I have seen percentages in the low 40s for 2010 in other sources.

    Ugh.

    1. decentralizedimproviser   14 years ago

      i find http://usgovernmentspending.com to be a very good resources for stats.

      according to their accumulated data, total federal, state & local spending in 2010 was $6.2 trillion. total gdp was $14.657 trillion. the ratio is 42.3%.

      i'm not sure where the authors of this story are coming up with $2 trillion of eliminations, but they are wrong.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    You know who else caused spending to reach the levels we have today?

    1. R C Dean   14 years ago

      I blame Hoover.

    2. Jon Schaffer`s Right Hand   14 years ago

      Really? Have I been wasting my Ire on Wilson and FDR this whole time?

  4. C B Knott   14 years ago

    This variety of spending is nearly impossible to reduce in the near term.

    The nearly impossible takes a little longer. I'm thinking maybe February 2013.

  5. Left wing joshua Corning   14 years ago

    But but taxes have been being cut since Reagan and that is why we have a deficit!!!

  6. jtuf   14 years ago

    AAaaag!

  7. P Brooks   14 years ago

    Today federal, state, and local expenditures as a share of GDP are back at the highs reached during World War II

    Hurray!

    1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

      Who's the greatest generation now, huh?

  8. Lost in AZ   14 years ago

    Gotta post the equivalent Tax Revenue chart. We've all seen the Federal tax as a percent of GDP and the historical lows, but how about state and local?

  9. Robert   14 years ago

    Odd...the graph highlights what seems to be a discrepancy that contradicts what the text says about the relative ease of ratcheting down military spending. Unless they're saying that the fact the numbers came down at all after World War 2 show that, and the +65% shows another, unhilighted factor at work.

  10. Episiarch   14 years ago

    It's not even 2PM and I need a fucking drink.

    1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

      It's after 5:00 p.m. EDT--go for it.

      1. Isaac Bartram   14 years ago

        It's always five o'clock somewhere.

    2. Joe M   14 years ago

      Where are you? Hawaii?

      1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

        He's on Pacific Time, three hours behind civilization.

        1. Joe M   14 years ago

          Heathen.

          1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

            It's all barbarians out there. I understand there are bands of warlords running that California place.

    3. Robert   14 years ago

      Which drinks are the ones for fucking?

  11. CoyoteBlue   14 years ago

    Hmmmmmm, government cheeze.

  12. CoyoteBlue   14 years ago

    Hmmmm, that's some good government cheese.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    That chart has a boner.

  14. P Brooks   14 years ago

    Oddly enough, I do not feel as though I am living in the Land of Milk and Honey.

    Perhaps Mister Bernanke would like to fly his MoolahCopter over my house.

  15. DJF   14 years ago

    """"Today federal, state, and local expenditures as a share of GDP are back at the highs reached during World War II.""'

    This makes sense since we are presently fighting the "War on Terror", the "War on Poverty", the "War on Drugs", etc etc etc

    Looking back, I see that the USA has been involved in numerous overlapping wars covering my entire lifetime.

  16. Sok Noo   14 years ago

    This looks like it might just actually work dude. WOw.

    http://www.being-anon.it.tc

    1. Joe M   14 years ago

      Hahah, comment FAIL.

  17. O'Bama   14 years ago

    "what is it Johnny Rocco wants?"

    "More!"

  18. buddyglass   14 years ago

    What's interesting to note about this is that the federal expenditure on a per GDP basis has no consistent upward trend. There is a spike over the last few years, due mostly to stimulus, but over the last 60 years it's varied greatly. (On the other hand if you measure it by inflation-adjusted dollars per capita there is an extremely consistent upward trend.)

    State and local, however, have seen a long, prolonged upward trend, even when measured per GDP.

    Here's the federal graph from 1950-2010:

    http://usgovernmentspending.co.....=c&local=s

    (State and local in a reply to this post since it won't let me include more than two links).

    So if you want to blame some level of government for the increase in total spending...don't blame the Feds.

    1. buddyglass   14 years ago

      State:

      http://usgovernmentspending.co.....=c&local=s

      Local:

      http://usgovernmentspending.co.....=c&local=s

  19. jtuf   14 years ago

    Well, the historical results are in. Neither those who feared a Communist take over of America nor those who dismissed those fears as groundless were correct. America is now 1/3 Communist.

  20. mike   14 years ago

    Quite ironic that I blogged something similar on Friday here. I took a look at the growth in employment across sectors as well as the general population using BLS stats. What was interesting (actually shocking) to me is that the number of Federal employees is essentially unchanged over 40 years.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!