Chart of the Day, Total Government Spending Edition
Just yesterday I found myself wishing for a chart showing combined spending for federal, state, and local governments as a share of GDP over time. Today, via Instapundit, I see that our friends at the Mercatus Center have hooked us up:
And wait! The news gets worse:
Today federal, state, and local expenditures as a share of GDP are back at the highs reached during World War II. This time, however, we are unlikely to see a swift decrease. Wartime expenditures on items like weaponry and salaries for conscripted soldiers were relatively easy to wind down. The bulk of current and future government spending is on entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. This variety of spending is nearly impossible to reduce in the near term.
Whole thing here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh the Austerity!
Beat me to it, Kat van H.
I was about to say something equally clever. Probably more clever. Now you'll never know. *runs away sobbing*
Something might be missing from those percentages - I have seen percentages in the low 40s for 2010 in other sources.
Ugh.
i find http://usgovernmentspending.com to be a very good resources for stats.
according to their accumulated data, total federal, state & local spending in 2010 was $6.2 trillion. total gdp was $14.657 trillion. the ratio is 42.3%.
i'm not sure where the authors of this story are coming up with $2 trillion of eliminations, but they are wrong.
You know who else caused spending to reach the levels we have today?
I blame Hoover.
Really? Have I been wasting my Ire on Wilson and FDR this whole time?
This variety of spending is nearly impossible to reduce in the near term.
The nearly impossible takes a little longer. I'm thinking maybe February 2013.
But but taxes have been being cut since Reagan and that is why we have a deficit!!!
AAaaag!
Today federal, state, and local expenditures as a share of GDP are back at the highs reached during World War II
Hurray!
Who's the greatest generation now, huh?
Gotta post the equivalent Tax Revenue chart. We've all seen the Federal tax as a percent of GDP and the historical lows, but how about state and local?
Odd...the graph highlights what seems to be a discrepancy that contradicts what the text says about the relative ease of ratcheting down military spending. Unless they're saying that the fact the numbers came down at all after World War 2 show that, and the +65% shows another, unhilighted factor at work.
It's not even 2PM and I need a fucking drink.
It's after 5:00 p.m. EDT--go for it.
It's always five o'clock somewhere.
Where are you? Hawaii?
He's on Pacific Time, three hours behind civilization.
Heathen.
It's all barbarians out there. I understand there are bands of warlords running that California place.
Which drinks are the ones for fucking?
Hmmmmmm, government cheeze.
Hmmmm, that's some good government cheese.
That chart has a boner.
Oddly enough, I do not feel as though I am living in the Land of Milk and Honey.
Perhaps Mister Bernanke would like to fly his MoolahCopter over my house.
""""Today federal, state, and local expenditures as a share of GDP are back at the highs reached during World War II.""'
This makes sense since we are presently fighting the "War on Terror", the "War on Poverty", the "War on Drugs", etc etc etc
Looking back, I see that the USA has been involved in numerous overlapping wars covering my entire lifetime.
This looks like it might just actually work dude. WOw.
http://www.being-anon.it.tc
Hahah, comment FAIL.
"what is it Johnny Rocco wants?"
"More!"
What's interesting to note about this is that the federal expenditure on a per GDP basis has no consistent upward trend. There is a spike over the last few years, due mostly to stimulus, but over the last 60 years it's varied greatly. (On the other hand if you measure it by inflation-adjusted dollars per capita there is an extremely consistent upward trend.)
State and local, however, have seen a long, prolonged upward trend, even when measured per GDP.
Here's the federal graph from 1950-2010:
http://usgovernmentspending.co.....=c&local=s
(State and local in a reply to this post since it won't let me include more than two links).
So if you want to blame some level of government for the increase in total spending...don't blame the Feds.
State:
http://usgovernmentspending.co.....=c&local=s
Local:
http://usgovernmentspending.co.....=c&local=s
Well, the historical results are in. Neither those who feared a Communist take over of America nor those who dismissed those fears as groundless were correct. America is now 1/3 Communist.
Quite ironic that I blogged something similar on Friday here. I took a look at the growth in employment across sectors as well as the general population using BLS stats. What was interesting (actually shocking) to me is that the number of Federal employees is essentially unchanged over 40 years.