LA Times Talks Sense on Soda Taxes
After jokingly suggesting the need for a "tater tax" on the heels of a Harvard study that shows potatoes may contribute more to obesity in America than do traditional fast-food culprits like soda and hamburgers, this L.A. Times editorial does a nice job explaining why efforts to attach sin taxes to various foods is such a pointless exercise.
The science on food is evolving, with researchers constantly turning up new dietary heroes and villains and sometimes reversing themselves. Potatoes have been a staple food for centuries and are a rich source of vitamins and minerals, but the Harvard study will doubtless send their reputation down the tuber. That's what happened to coconuts. In 1994, a study from the Center for [Science in] the Public Interest found that movie-theater popcorn popped in coconut oil was a coronary in a cardboard cup, hurting sales at theaters and prompting many to switch to other oils. Today, health-food stores have whole shelves devoted to non-hydrogenated coconut oil, which is now considered relatively beneficial.
Soda taxes were part of the federal healthcare reform bill before being stripped out, and cities and states nationwide are considering them. We'll grant that soda pop is nearly devoid of nutritional value and that phasing it out of our diets would do more good than harm, but a tax wouldn't stop people from switching to other drinks, such as fruit juices, that are just as fattening. Tax French fries, and people would just switch to onion rings. Moreover, the next study might find that an order of fries and a Coke are better for you than previously believed.
Whole thing here. Last year New York Times opinionator Mark Bittman noted soda taxes would do next to nothing to combat obesity, and then embraced them anyways. I responded.
In other soda v. produce news, the L.A. Times is reporting that exactly one Angeleno would trade a half-empty bottle of soda for a pineapple.
Baylen Linnekin is a lawyer and the executive director of Keep Food Legal, a nonprofit that promotes culinary freedom, the idea that people should be free to make and consume whatever commestibles they prefer. For more information and to join or donate, go here now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hard to feel bad for people in LA
Frankly, drinking soda (at least caffeinated colas) makes me eat a lot less.
Caffeine and simple sugar make a good appetite suppressant.
I miss Ephedra.
Since when is the LA Times ed-page making so much sense?
Did someone forget to take their meds or something?
In 1994, a study from the Center for [Science in] the Public Interest found that movie-theater popcorn popped in coconut oil was a coronary in a cardboard cup...
If movie theaters and fast food restaurants had taken my advice and replaced all their seats with treadmills, the popcorn and burgers wouldn't be causing these heart attacks, would they?
lolz
Nanny knows best! Even though she doesn't know jack shit.
The Chinese and Swiss believe dog meat to be particularly healthy. For Norwegian Polar explorer Roald Amundsen it was a lifesaver:
"...there is the obvious advantage that dog can be fed on dog. One can reduce one's pack little by little, slaughtering the feebler ones and feeding the chosen with them. In this way they get fresh meat. Our dogs lived on dog's flesh and pemmican the whole way, and this enabled them to do splendid work. And if we ourselves wanted a piece of fresh meat we could cut off a delicate little fillet; it tasted to us as good as the best beef. The dogs do not object at all; as long as they get their share they do not mind what part of their comrade's carcass it comes from. All that was left after one of these canine meals was the teeth of the victim - and if it had been a really hard day, these also disappeared."
This seems apropos considering that San Francisco is debating banning the sale of pets, and activists there want to go after "online dog sales" next.
Their chief complaint is that so many dogs end up going unwanted and have to be killed in shelters. You, sir, have chanced about a most excellent solution.
There's a cure for cancer hidden within the United States Tax Code. Like in National Treasure, we just have to find it.
Think of how many boobytraps must be hidden in there though.
Although few people participated in the soda exchange, organizers said they were undeterred and their campaign to promote healthful beverage consumption would continue.
A pineapple is a beverage?
Yeah, you cut it open and drink the water in the middle...wait, wrong produce. Hmmm, maybe the organizers made the same mistake?
"Ok, let's kick off this event....hey, these aren't coconuts!"
"Whoops, my bad."
hey, these aren't coconuts!
Interestingly, these are the last words spoken on-camera by the Warty character in my next movie.
*eager anticipation*
In a world with no laws, the planets are being pillaged by space vikings...
Blood Ocean
+1 for the Metalocalypse reference. Excellent show.
"We're showing people that there are cheap and healthy alternatives to soda," said Maribel Diaz of Hunger Action L.A. "You can flavor water by putting cucumber or spearmint in it."
Apparently, a cucumber is also the start of a delicious beverage as well. Yum!
I just love how the health conscious don't even realize how stupid they sound to someone who just wants a Coke. Like they never would have thought to chop up a vegetable and put it in their water.
Water with a slice of cucumber, how revolting.
Tax calories directly. Progressive taxes of course. The first 10 calories per pound of body weight are tax-free.
Tax caloric input, tax the work done with the derived energy, then tax the waste products.
Beautiful.
wait, what? I was told obesity was caused by glands, metabolism, and big bones.
I do have big bones. But I could have bones like chopsticks and still be overweight. And I'd be too fragile to stand, I'll wager.
I find it interesting so many people find the exclusion of empty carbohydrate calories so objectionable. Think of it in terms of the time our ancestors have had to develop the means to digest particular foods. 4,500,000 or so years of hominid ancestors plus 1,900,000 years or so of human ancestors plus 11,000 years or so of agriculture.
Hunter-gatherers (including scavengers) have been eating protein, fat and high-fiber vegetables and leafy greens for 6 or 7 million years. Sugar and white flour didn't became widely available and cheap until the invention of the steel roller mill in the mid-19th century. Americans now get nearly half their calories from soda.
What part of that do you think we're best adapted to?
Ever see a fat concentration camp prisoner?
Which is why I never bought those excuses.
Ever see a healthy concentration camp prisoner?
There's skinny-good, and there's skinny-bad, chump.
Starvation is something done to a victim. Many concentration camp prisoners were starved to death. Dying to lose weight, no doubt.
Starving an obese person can actually lead to the victim starving to death with large fat reserves intact. Michael Edelman starved to death still weighing 600 pounds. http://amazglobe.blogspot.com/.....na-ny.html
Seven years ago I lost 125 pounds in 8 months after decades of not being able to stop gaining, much less lose any. I have kept it off since. Did I suddenly develop willpower? Nope. I stopped driving up my insulin levels with carbohydrates. I eat freely of animal fats and protein, and high-fiber vegetables. When I'm hungry, I eat. Yet it works.
Without our government, you'd all be stuck in Siberia now, sucking the juice from a rotten commie potato.
I don't understand why hippies feel this need to flavor water by throwing perfectly good vegetables into it. Water tastes like water. If you want something that doesn't taste like water, maybe you should not drink water.
But water is the only healthy thing to drink. And in order to make it taste good (thus drinkable) you have to put something with flavor that will rub off in it. Plus you get the added bonus of looking chic if someone sees you drinking water with a slice of something in it.
Personally, I prefer a slice of bacon to a slice of cucumber in my water.
Sad Pig stares at you mournfully.
If you want to get people healthy, if that's really the goal.. you'd do the exact opposite: tax benefits for better health (and healthy children would also benefit parents)
(well, it's not actually an equitable system, and I'm for a flat tax anyways, but if you want to work within the system..)
Measure blood pressure, sugar, salt, creatine (kidney), LDL, HDL, triglycerides, body fat, etc
The La Times' editorial had the original name correct. They ommitted the 'Science' part of the name shedding a more truthful light on the organization. Now if they could just remove "public interest" we'd be onto something.
Tax the companies that use high fructose corn syrup in their products, not the consumers.