Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

The Best Jazz You'll Never Hear

Matt Welch | 4.28.2011 11:33 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Back in the 1930s and '40s, a jazz musician and technological wizard with the wonderful name of William Savory found a way to record more than one thousand live performances of jazz music's all-time greats. It was only last summer, when the National Jazz Museum in Harlem acquired the cache six years after Savory's death, that the world learned the extent of the collection. According to the ABA Journal:

Among the treasures: Coleman Hawkins, the first great tenor saxophonist in jazz, playing multiple ad-lib choruses on the classic "Body and Soul." Billie Holiday, accompanied only by piano, singing a moving rubato version of "Strange Fruit," a chilling musical condemnation of lynching. The Count Basie Orchestra performing at the world's first outdoor jazz festival, the 1938 Carnival of Swing on Randall's Island in New York City. Basie's tenor sax stars, Lester Young and Herschel Evans, sharing solos on "Texas Shuffle." Benny Goodman and Teddy Wilson—on harpsichord instead of his usual piano—performing "Lady Be Good!" And the list goes on.

The collection is, in a word, historic. "It is a wonderful addition to our knowledge of a great period in jazz," says Dan Morgenstern, director of the Institute of Jazz Studies at Rutgers University in Newark, N.J. And, Morgenstern says, "the sound quality of many of these works is amazing. Some of it is of pristine quality. It is a cultural treasure and should be made widely available."

Now comes the big "but":

The question, however, is whether that will happen anytime soon. And if it doesn't, music fans might be justified in putting the blame on copyright law. "The potential copyright liability that could attach to redistribution of these recordings is so large—and, more importantly, so uncertain—that there may never be a public distribution of the recordings," wrote David G. Post, a law professor at Temple University in Philadelphia, on the Volokh Conspiracy blog. "Tracking down all the parties who may have a copyright interest in these performances, and therefore an entitlement to royalty payments (or to enjoining their distribution), is a monumental—and quite possibly an impossible—task."

Whole fascinating and complex tale here; link via Julian Sanchez's Twitter feed. Reason on intellectual property here, including this interesting 2008 Reason.tv roundtable with MP3.com founder Michael Robertson, pop historian Martin Torgoff, and First Amendment lawyer Allan Gelbard.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Kung Fu Fighting: Not Racist, Says Composer, Performer

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PolicyCopyrightTechnologyMusicIntellectual PropertyScience & TechnologyCultureEconomics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

    Wikileaks

  2. John   14 years ago

    Copyright is the monster that is eating our cultural heritage. The 1980s PBS documentary “Eyes on the Prize” has never been released on DVD and is available only in the form of worn out VHS tapes at the odd library. The reason is that the film contains so much copyrighted material it would cost millions to renew the rights. So no one has and the thing can’t be reproduced and if things don’t change will be lost to history in the coming years.

    1. db   14 years ago

      Not to mention all the MST3K episodes lost to future generations because of expired exhibition rights.

      1. Colonel_Angus   14 years ago

        Dude. Space Ghost too.

    2. TomD   14 years ago

      How is it your “cultural heritage” if you can’t even hear or see it?

      It’s not. You don’t get to have just because you want it.

      1. Bradley   14 years ago

        Goddamn Randians. Nobody’s saying anyone should be forced to provide you with music/movies/etc. All we’re saying is that government shouldn’t give the copyright assholes a venue to sue if you decide to distribute something that they’ve asserted bogus ownership rights to all possible copies of.

      2. NeonCat   14 years ago

        You’re right, it’s so much better the way it is now, where at least a bunch of lawyers, holding companies and others at least aren’t being ripped off by this dead dude’s recording these performances.

        1. TomD   14 years ago

          “Better”? What does that have to do with anything?

          Love how certain libertarians lapse into “let’s-choreograph-a-certain-society” territory when it comes to matters of intellectual property.

          1. NeonCat   14 years ago

            People like you make me ashamed to call myself a libertarian. You seem every bit as small-minded, as nickle and dime minded as our most hateful critics say we are.
            The people who made these recordings are all dead. And you would let their work lie in the tomb with them so at least intellectual property would not be disturbed.

            But there’s no arguing with someone like you. You’re right, someone has the rights to that property and there’s not enough money to be made to pay them all off. So fuck it, fuck everything that anyone has ever done that falls under the bastard copyright laws we have now. It should all just be sealed up not for better or worse but because that’s the right and proper thing to do.

            You want to call me a thief, go ahead. I call you someone who would, if they could, put blinders and earplugs on everyone and charge them a fee to see and hear.

      3. cynical   14 years ago

        Because you did hear or see it in the past and it shaped you, but you’re unable to share that part of your life with other people?

  3. Beau Zeaux   14 years ago

    Can’t they, like, just get Carrie Underwood to hum it or something?

  4. Pip   14 years ago

    Why not just put it online for free?

  5. dbcooper   14 years ago

    Keepin’ it funky in the soviet union circa “78.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?g…..wp-DxIdqOQ

  6. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    If any of you want to republish my blog comments after my death, you can do so. I will not confer my copyright to anyone when I pass. That is my pledge to you.

    1. Fist of Etiquette Jr.   14 years ago

      FU

      1. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

        See? You’re already on your way to building a bankable cache of blog comments for yourself. You are inheriting self-reliance, twerp.

  7. Aresen   14 years ago

    Chalk up another win for Jack Valenti.

    Copyright has gone from being a means to ensure that a creator can profit from his work to a tool of megacorporations.

  8. Tolly   14 years ago

    Actually isn’t this a legacy of that idiot, pro-skier, Sonny Bono?
    I seem to remember him getting comfy with the media industry and pushing through the bullshit legislation that extended copyright past any sensible timeframe.

    Ugh. They really should just transfer it to a digital version and then anonymously throw it onto the web for all to disseminate.

    This is why Hollywood and music companies deserve to die and rot from the inside out. They are too worried about losing the phantom money that new technology is stealing from them, so they don’t bother to utilize a better way of delivering it.

    1. John   14 years ago

      Bono is that moron from Alabama Heflin the Senator for Hollywood and Orlando.

  9. ?   14 years ago

    Why not just put it online for free?

    You’re talking about people who think being quoted in the ABA Journal is cool (or at least not shameful). Wrong crowd.

    And the story is an act of lobbying? for making middleman/hoarders like Google and the Jazz Museum the de facto lawful rights-holders and -profiteers for all works that fall within their gaze?not a moral narrative about letting people hear old tapes.

    That part’s just the hook. For suckers.

  10. Paul   14 years ago

    Why doesn’t the government just Eminent Domain them? Sounds like they serve a good Public Purpose.

    1. Ian Smithsen   14 years ago

      Right! They’re a national treasure at least as important as The Blue Dress.

  11. Alan Vanneman   14 years ago

    There are any number of “bootleg” jazz recordings that have long been available on CD and are available now on Amazon et al. I don’t really see what the fuss is. Radio stations used to broadcast live performances every day (Benny Goodman live from the Madhattan Room high atop the Hotel Pennsylvania) and frequently recorded these performances for rebroadcast. There are more “unauthorized” recordings of Charlie Parker’s work available than “official” recordings.

    Of course, the Sonny Bono Monopoly Protection Act is an abomination, but what else can you expect in this lousy capitalist society?

    1. Paul   14 years ago

      Of course, the Sonny Bono Monopoly Protection Act is an abomination, but what else can you expect in this lousy capitalist society?

      Actual capitalism?

    2. ChrisO   14 years ago

      Yeah, I’ve got several bootleg Coltrane albums sourced from radio broadcasts.

      The problem with going the bootleg route in this case is that this material is now both known to all the shysters out there and only in existence in exactly one copy in a medium that is difficult to digitize without a lot of work and expertise.

      In fact, since these oversize shellac discs were Savory’s own invention, it might be that he had the only playback devices that would play them.

  12. Flame Bait   14 years ago

    Property should be taken if the end result is “desirable?” The end justifies the means?

  13. Otto   14 years ago

    The original copyright terms were good – 14 years, and you could re-apply for 14 more.

    If they want to keep re-applying, a copyright holder should have to pay. Start with $1,000 for the first renewal, and double the cost each time. By the 7th or 8th renewal, you’re talking about some serious money.

  14. TomD   14 years ago

    Here comes a bunch of folks to act as if hearing certain jazz recordings is not only some moral right, but is crucial to the advancement — nay, the survival — of the human race.

    If those particular sound waves don’t make their way into everyone’s ears, we’re doomed!

    1. The Rogue Economist   14 years ago

      Meh, we’re doomed regardless. Might as well enjoy the trip.

      1. cynical   14 years ago

        What does that have to with listening to jazz?

  15. Otto   14 years ago

    Also – fair use, prior to my name change.

  16. yankees hats   14 years ago

    thanks for your share.

  17. the hundreds hats   14 years ago

    Keepin’ it funky in the soviet union circa “78.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

As American as Due Process

Billy Binion | From the July 2025 issue

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!