Major Property Rights Victory in California
Great news out of California last week, where Superior Court Judge Steven R. Denton struck down National City's attempt to use eminent domain against the Community Youth Athletic Center, a local outfit focused on keeping at-risk youths off the streets and away from gangs. As the San Diego Union Tribune reports:
In this case, National City was trying to renew its eminent domain authority over the city's redevelopment zone for another decade, affecting some 692 properties, to clear the way for a 24-story mixed-use condominium development proposed by a private developer.
Landowners, led by the [Community Youth Athletic Center], sued in 2007, arguing the city didn't have the evidence required under the law.
In his ruling, the judge agreed with almost every contention that the landowners made, saying the city did not provide "specific, quantifiable evidence about the location and prevalence of the alleged blighting conditions."
It's also worth noting that this is the first decision to apply California's post-Kelo eminent domain reforms, which were designed precisely to prevent abusive situations like this one. Government officials and development agency bureaucrats around the state can't be very happy with this one—which is always a good sign when it comes to eminent domain cases. For more, check out Reason.tv's 2007 report on the case, "National City: Eminent Domain Gone Wild."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The really interesting follow-up article will be when the state Supreme Court overturns the decision and hands the land over to the city.
Based on their prior decisions, I'll be shocked if this stands.
Yeah, my first thought was "Will this stand on appeal?"
If it does stand, it will turn the tide
Just like libertarians to applaud the selfish kids at the Community Youth Athletic Center. That construction project would have created all sorts of union jobs.
Indeed, these urchins should forced to the street so I can hunt them for sport.
urchins = blight
brown urchins = super blight
If the purpose of the state of Ca isn't to help wealthy developers, than what the hell it is???
+1
Or the followup post of Reason fan fic where Gillespie shows off his breakdancing skills which he uses to save the community center
+2: Electric Boogaloo
Electric Boogaloo 3: The Gillespie Shuffle.
"Nick, if I ever see you try anything that crazy again...this crew might just have some new parachute pants!"
Philosophical question: Are leather parachute pants just leather pants with a lot of zippers?
No, as they are not skin tight and don't require lubricant to get into them. Jeez, this is easy stuff, NutraSweet.
You should make Aspertame his new nickname, instead.
Stevia would be more...current.
I am not a natural product.
Equal?
I hate equality, I'm a libertarian.
Tab?
Shift key?
Escape?
for this whole thread: End
INSERT
Control-break.
Control-alt-delete.
Sucralose?
what color are the pants?
The colour out of space. And they make all who view them insane.
The color of desperation.
These uniforms are lame man.
Jesus Christ, if ever a headline SCREAMED OUT for a reference to EB2, this was it.
Fail!
If Gillespie, Cavanaugh or Walker had written this, they would have delivered. Damon's going to have to buy coffee and doughnuts for the next 5 editorial meetings for his omission.
If Gillespie, Cavanaugh or Walker had written this, they would have delivered. Damon's going to have to buy coffee and doughnutshookers and blow for the next 5 editorial meetings for his omission.
I thought the hookers & blow were provided by the Koch brothers' largesse. Or do they just provide the monocles for Reason's editors?
the Kochs don't share their hookers & blow, that would be socialism.
These people could've solved their own problem if they just unelected the Kleptocrats running their city government.
Too bad they don't understand the ramifications of one-party rule.
to clear the way for a 24-story mixed-use condominium development proposed by a private developer.
Because mixed-use condo complexes are so desperately needed in Southern California these days.
Those "developers" should be the ones celebrating.
The ones celebrating are the owners of other units. Even with the decline in prices, Southern california still has a housing shortage with supply far below what a less regulated market would have.
However, two wrongs don't make a right; eminent domain is no solution.
They're especially not needed in National City. The place is a low rent, pre-war suburb with delusions of grandeur.
Ya see! Libtards are right! Libertarians are nothing but corporate shills who whore themselves out for private business and hate the community and OH, wait, nevermind.
Wait, National City is the name of a PLACE?
Here I have seen this story a few times as it has played out and I kept thinking it was National City the bank that was trying to steal property.
I thought that "National City" was where some comic book superhero lived.
I kept thinking it was National City the bank
So I wasn't the only one.
I suspect National City Bank has been gone for decades.
It was acquired by PNC during the Troubles.
Great point that officials tend not to be happy when judges say they can't seize other people's homes.
http://www.intellectualtakeout.....e-examined