Reason Writers at CNN.com: Matt Welch Argues Against a Government Shutdown
Over at CNN.com, Reason Editor in Chief Matt Welch argues that shutting the federal government down today, no matter how tasty, could have potentially negative effects on the long-term prospects for fiscal and budget reform. The piece begins like this:
Please don't get me wrong: As an American, I would swell with patriotic glee if the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, and Housing and Urban Development were unable for a few hours or even weeks to do their dirty business. As a resident of the federally funded District of Columbia, I would be relieved if my cartoonishly corrupt local government missed out on a few direct deposits. And as a libertarian, I relish the prospect of a demonstration of how inessential most government services are.
But as someone who has been making the case since George W. Bush's first term that the federal government is growing at a rate that is literally, even admittedly, unsustainable, I fear that taking the keys from the Winnebago of state will redirect the national conversation away from the urgent business of long-term reform and toward the short-term theatrics of a political cage match.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As somebody with tickets to Germany at the end of May but no passport for my daughter, I am very anti-shutdown. (And, so long as countries require passports for travel, this seems like a fairly legitimate and important function if you ask me.)
Why did you wait so long to apply for one? You're certainly no boy scout.
Ha! For the record, we applied for it a few weeks ago; it's just still being processed (presumably).
I was amazed at how quickly mine got processed when I renewed not too long ago. Probably takes longer for a new application, though.
IIRC, you can grease the process with some extra cash.
It's called hiring a travel service that will personally walk your application through the agency that approves it.
Fuck yeah. I gave the gummint 90 days or so, but paid for the expedited and overnight. I got it in 8. I was floored.
Yeah, me being the cheap bastard I am (and having just dropped $2k on the tickets) I told my wife, "Don't bother with expedited. The last time we applied it came in like three weeks, and we don't leave for over two months!" I blame my Scottish ancestors.
The engineer says "I just dropped two grand on the tickets, I should expedite the passport to protect that investment." It's all about risk management.
Of course living with someone that views daily life as a sequence of risks to be managed can be hard on the spouse.
I'm all about risk management. Unfortunately, I just miscalculated my risk. Actually, given the odds of a government shut-down delaying passports, I could argue that I accurately calculated my risk; I just got unlucky. Of course, so long as the shut-down isn't prolonged I should get my passport anyway, in which case I played my cards just right.
Probability maybe low; but impact catestrophic (no trip); so net risk is moderate; the correct action plan is to avoid; the cost of action plan is the expedite fee.
You picked "accept" as the action plan for a risk with potentially catestrophic impact. The saftey engineers would claim that is a bad decision.
Your choices were to
1)accept the risk -- which you did
2)avoid the risk by expediting the passport service
3)mitigate the risk by buying travel isurance to get your tickets refunded if you don't get your passport in time
4)transfer the risk by calling up your elected representatives and letting them know you'd shoot the fuckers if they didn't pass a budget
The Passport and Visa office is fully funded by fees and doesn't require an appropriations.
They will close it to be Dicks.
Maybe you're related to poet Ewan McTeagle.
Depending on how young she is you could probably fit her into a suitcase.
If anybody asks you what's in the bag just tell them, "Oh, I have a small child in here." They'll never believe you.
Enjoy Hamburg!
"And as a libertarian"
Fucking lying-assed bastard.
HOMER NODS:
For some reason I was confusing Welch with Weigel. I regret the error.
I was wondering where that outrage came from...
Fucking dysnomia, how does it work?
Please don't get me wrong: As an American, I would swell...
Geez. Enough with the double entendres, Welch. You need to clean up your act when you move up to the majors such as CNN.
Also, the tie you wore when you wrote that piece was gawd awful.
Just wait'll you see my clothes tonight!
Did you borrow one of Michael Lesko's suits?
Because of the swelling?
Still laughing about that...
I look forward to assuming it was ill-considered.
Good. I'm glad you're wearing clothes tonight.
Please go to http://www.votizen.com/ which lets registered voters contact their congressmen. Tell them to balance the budget *now*, that $1million per household to pay federal IOUs is too much! http://www.StopNationalDebt.com links to it, so tell everyone to visit there!
Listen, do you want to stop national debt or not?
Actually I'd like to stop most federal spending, but we'll start with cutting the federal credit card. Perhaps if we wake people up to how much federal IOUs are and how much the government is spending there will be more libertarians. Most non-political junkies have no clue how bad the situation is.
Yes, but how do you feel about the debt?
I feel like the debt should be scaring the general public more than it is.. which is why my site exists. Political junkies here know how bad it is, but most of the public doesn't. The tea party movement, and the libertarian movement, would be larger than they are.
If all libertarians would make the effort to spread the word that $1 million per household is too much then politicians wouldn't get away with dragging their heals the way they do. Unfortunately we are too busy talking about the details amongst ourselves to take enough time trying to wake the general public up. Of course I'm here "preaching to the choir" myself.. but thats because more people need to get on board to spread this one simple message to wake the public up.
Political junkies here know how bad it is, but most of the public doesn't.
I totally agree. And that's why you should be out there spreading the word. We already get it here. Go to HuffPo, Salon, TPM and Politico. Spread your gospel, guy.
Your work* here is done.
(*By work, I mean incessant blogwhoring on a rectal-ian scale)
I picked one day to post on relevant posts here, in hopes others would decide to help spread the word as well, which shouldn't be that big a deal (the 2 copies of a post below were a software glitch, browser stalled and didn't seem to post). Most libertarians too easily assume the rest of the public knows this stuff. but they don't so I think we need to focus on spreading the simple message of how large the debt is and how much the government is spending, etc.
I think we need to start talking differently about the size of the debt and unfunded liabilities so it sinks into the general public to whom numbers in the $trillions are too abstract.
Federal government will need >$1 million per household to pay its IOUs!
> $116 trillion ="official" debt plus money short for future social security, medicare, etc
Even its "official debt" of $14.2 trillion is $123,754 per household!
Details at http://StopNationalDebt.com
Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/.....0177811775
I think we need to start talking differently about the size of the debt and unfunded liabilities so it sinks into the general public to whom numbers in the $trillions are too abstract.
Federal government will need >$1 million per household to pay its IOUs!
> $116 trillion ="official" debt plus money short for future social security, medicare, etc
Even its "official debt" of $14.2 trillion is $123,754 per household!
Details at http://StopNationalDebt.com
Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/.....0177811775
Phish elsewhere, asscunt.
Yeah, we've already got anonbot as our token linkwhore.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
Thought I recognized that--it's a real Feynman quote. Not sure from what, though.
But, as far as we know, those individual stars in the heavens aren't losing value at the same rate as the dollar.
That's why we had to discover other galaxies before moving debt into the trillions.
And it's a good thing that we have a long way to go before we start contemplating the number of atoms in a sugar cube.
If you can still find a sugar cube. Stores in GA stopped carrying them about 6 months ago. No idea if it was a manufacturer decision of just a shelf space/turnover issue. I wound up ordering sugar cubes from Amazon. Oh the humanity!!
Sugarcube on Amazon? I recommend this.
As a resident of the federally funded District of Columbia...
That's brutal. Does Reason give you combat pay to live in that swamp?
The District of Columbia isn't federally funded. It's funded by the rest of us.
I, for one, intend to foreclose.
I call first pick on the Air & Space Museum.
Okay, but I get the Apollo 11 capsule. And the Constitution.
Haha. You suckers. I'm calling dibs on the Holocaust Museum so I can finally live out my dream of having more shoes than Imelda Marcos.
This seems appropriate.
OK, wow this makes a whole lot of sense dude. Wow.
http://www.Anonymous-Toolz.tk
I saw a post from anonabot over at Salon the other day and felt jealous. Our bot is not supposed to hang out with the liberal hookers over there.
And just what were you doing over there? [arms crossed, foot tapping...]
80% of salon's stories are crap. on slow days at work, I browse through the other 20%.
making the case since George W. Bush's first term that the federal government is growing at a rate that is literally, even admittedly, unsustainable
And, yet, strangely, it continues. I fear that many "sustaining" tricks await us, shutdown or not.
From the linked article:
This black-on-black interior violence has got to stop!
Matt, I hear what you're saying, but we're already in a stupid cage match, so at least let me enjoy the theater of a shutdown. I have a dream! I too, long to be free, even if only for a couple of weeks.
Matt may be right, but it makes him look like a chickenshit.
And a SHORT shutdown may do exactly what Matt says. But the longer it goes, the more likely it will produce effects much like Matt wants.
Matt, who did your Glamour Shot?
Really. It looks like the internet fat-girl angle photos that should be prosecuted for false advertising.
He's not making kissy-face though.
The duck goes:
Quack.
Since this whole thing comes down to Planned Parenthood, when is Congress going to start worrying about men's prostate health and pay for trips to massage parlors. Then we can pontificate about how many men Congress wants to kill during the next shutdown.
^^This.^^
"What do we want?"
"Happy endings!"
"When do we want 'em?"
"Now!"
Your government-union massage boy/babe will be glad to provide. Take a number.
thanks for your share...
I really like it...
This black-on-black interior violence has got to stop!