Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Reason Writers on Freedom Watch: Matt Welch Talks About What Paul Ryan Will and Won't Cut

Reason Staff | 4.6.2011 6:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Last night on Fox Business Network's Freedom Watch program, Reason Editor in Chief Matt Welch discussed Roadmap 2.0 from Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI). Around five minutes:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: What Elites See When They Look at the Fed

Reason Staff
PoliticsPolicyNanny StateDefenseMedicareEntitlementsBudget
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (55)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. ratherr   14 years ago

    Unless you have a time travel appointment to keep at 2122 North Clark Street in Chicago's North Side, dump the tie.

    1. Matt Welch   14 years ago

      Mistakes Were Made.

      1. Jim   14 years ago

        Does a wardrobe person at the studio pick that out for you? I'm genuinely curious.

        1. Matt Welch   14 years ago

          1) Torrential downpour in the morning requires raincoat not blazer.
          2) Last-minute TV request.
          3) Horror-realization A) that Emergency Blazer is a super-ugly navy blue that does not blend well with marijuana-leaf-button black shirt.
          4) Horror-realization B) that Emergency Tie is nowhere to be found, thus occasioning a scavenge of (shudder) the Reason supply closet.
          5) Given the material at hand, made the strategic decision to Go All In.

          I'm having a makeover. That's the last you'll see of that.

          1. Jim   14 years ago

            Understood. I wasn't making fun, I just didn't know that in instances such as these, if you bring your own wardrobe, if they provide for you, if you can bring your own but they have the right to re-dress you for the cameras if they see fit, etc. Never been on TV, so I didn't know how these things work.

            1. Matt Welch   14 years ago

              At most they'll overrule my one-button-onedone style choice, and on one memorable occasion I got my unibrow plucked. These are makeup-artist decisions, not network diktats. And no, they ain't no clothes lying around, least not that I've seen.

              1. Jim   14 years ago

                Interesting. I'll make sure to "dress for success" if I'm ever scheduled, and not count on their wardrobe department to provide.

                Now I'll just sit back, and wait for the network to call to book my appearance...any minute now...

              2. Tanya   14 years ago

                I see you took my advice on the unibrow. Well done.

              3. johnl   14 years ago

                Certainly no spare clothes to fit the trim frame of such a fine looking newsman.

          2. rather   14 years ago

            You should have a suit ready in a bag at your office and don't pick it out yourself.

            If you are having a makeover, spend some money on new eyeglasses; something darker with smaller lenses.

            Wear dark suits but the tie should be narrower, and should not scream 'daddy's closet'

            You're controlling your hand jerking movements, and it helps keep the audience attention on your words, and not your 'french talk'

            1. Matt Welch   14 years ago

              Thank you sir, may I have another?

              1. rather   14 years ago

                fashion advice only-I'm not interested in your role-play fantasy 😉

              2. Tanya   14 years ago

                Not that you need new glasses - you've got the academic/journalist chic going on now - but if you do decide you need new ones, embrace our evil Chinese overlords and go with zennioptical(dot)com. $50 gets you what ye olde optical on the corner would get you for 300 clams.

                Remember, we don't care what you look like, we just care how you'll be judged by Joe Q. Public.

            2. Matt Welch   14 years ago

              Also, re: "daddy's closet," this just in from Pete Welch:

              "Matt: That was a nice Yellow tie you had on yesterday. Did you Buy the tie?? What was the cost for Reasons to advertise on FOX - The Judge's Show??"

              So you see? Not his.

              1. rather   14 years ago

                Hmm, with all due respect to daddy, he's the target audience for Katie Couric, and you need to embrace the Redeye audience.

                Shop with someone under 30!

              2. Warty   14 years ago

                I'm really disappointed in you for talking to rectal, Matt. This will go on your Permanent Record.

                1. rather   14 years ago

                  He has commented on my blog
                  -I may know him in real life too

                  1. rather   14 years ago

                    then again, we may know each other my dear Warty

                    1. Rather Retarded   14 years ago

                      I'm a big girl now!

              3. GILMORE   14 years ago

                this just in from Pete Welch:

                "Matt: That was a nice Yellow tie you had on yesterday"

                Owww.

                Damn. Even dad's getting shots in.

          3. GILMORE   14 years ago

            ....

            LOL^n where n=a lot

            this is so much funnier hearing about now.. after having written 10mins of musings on the existential wrongness of this particular wardrobe... at least there *is* an explanation.

            That said: dude, dry clean some backup shit. Lesson probably already learned I guess...

      2. Episiarch   14 years ago

        You look like you're vying for the position of King Nerd Pimp. I say go for it.

        1. Otto   14 years ago

          It's a libertarian magazine. I think King Nerd Pimp is an actual position.

          1. Sniktpool   14 years ago

            +1

        2. Spiny Norman   14 years ago

          I think it's a good look for hosting a religious program at 3 AM on local affiliate TV. Tell some inspirational stories, hawk some John the Baptist tea towels, that sort of thing.

          1. Matt Welch   14 years ago

            Gene Scott *is* one of my heroes....

            1. dbcooper   14 years ago

              Herzog's doco on him is pretty good.

              http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080796/combined

              1. Matt Welch   14 years ago

                How I didn't know this existed I can't tell you.

                1. dbcooper   14 years ago

                  You may have to download it from a torrent or a streaming service/file-locker. Can be very hard to find for purchase.

            2. Almanian   14 years ago

              Ohhhhohoho...if you're a Gene Scott fan, you just went up several notches on the hold Almanian Respect Meter.

              We used to watch him late a night in the fraternity house, hammered on whatever. What a GREAT show for hammered college kids! Better than the Stooges on Detroit's Channel 50 (which was choice #2)

              Awesome...

            3. juris imprudent   14 years ago

              Scott made the blackboard weird when Beck was still in diapers. Acid trip with instant come-down (i.e. changing the channel).

    2. heller   14 years ago

      Don't forget to add "ratherr" to your troll INCIF list everyone!

      1. TeamBarstool   14 years ago

        please tell me there's one for Safari. e-mail me

        1. heller   14 years ago

          Sorry, I only know of the Chrome version.

    3. Doc S   14 years ago

      he should have worn this
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded

    4. GILMORE   14 years ago

      Oh, fuck, I didn't look at the comments first... my reaction to Matrix-Welch is way below.

      At least there is apparently an explanation. I suspected as much.

  2. Otto   14 years ago

    Nice of her to let you speak a little.

  3. johnl   14 years ago

    Those colors are very good for Matt. I guess he is sticking to the theory that there are lots of right ways to tie a tie. So the black leather jacket, the brown suede sportcoat, and the tie that looks like dad tied it are the trademarks.

  4. seminal penis   14 years ago

    The Crabs the crabs the crabs the crabs. RON PAUL! He will announce for prez in 2012 in some near future date to be determined. Von Mises is wisest.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    Did she characterize Rostenkowski's efforts as reforming Medicare? And at around 2:45, it looked like MacDonald was starting into her standup routine. "And what's the deeeaaal with all these czars, anyway? I mean, I guess Obama figures it worked out so well for the Romanovs, why not bring it back? And how many does he need, anyway? Do we really want a bunch of czars taking over things? Next thing you know, when things get out of hand, Obama's going to have to bring in Bolsheviks to get rid of the czars, and then someone will have to re-animate Reagan to get rid of the commies and it's going to be a whole thing..."

    Also, black and gold. Good colors. STEEL CITY RULES! Go Pens.

  6. dbcooper   14 years ago

    No coverage of Portugal's request for a bailout?

  7. Rob   14 years ago

    Matt looks like he just was named Gm of The Steelers. At least he could have had a Terrible Towel or a pianoramic picture of the Three Rivers on the wall behind him.

    1. Rob   14 years ago

      Damn spell check. "Panoramic".

    2. Matt Welch   14 years ago

      One for the Thumb in '81!

    3. Almanian   14 years ago

      Wasn't "Pianorama" Bananarama's final, unreleased album?

      1. Otto   14 years ago

        No, it was Greg Hawkes' idea for the third Cars Album. Ocasek tweaked it a bit.

  8. sage   14 years ago

    "Bunch of stupid czars..."

    *Stands, claps slowly*

  9. Mr Whipple???   14 years ago

    pal?at?a?ble/[pal-uh-tuh-buhl]

    1:09

    Reading a teleprompter is hard.

    1. Hostess w/ the Mostest   14 years ago

      You say potahto ...

      1. Dan Quayle   14 years ago

        That's potato*e*.

  10. Spiny Norman   14 years ago

    Was that Janeane Garofalo?

    1. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

      Good call.

    2. Janeane Garofalo   14 years ago

      That's meanism straight up.

  11. GILMORE   14 years ago

    Regarding Reason-staff fashion-issues, which have come up once or twice before:

    ...

    It seems that its the year of experimentation in 2011.

    First we are shocked, aroused, amused, then finally bored with Nick's Lemmy-meets-Fu Manchu mustache-thing, whose demise was neither widely nor long-mourned...

    Then comes some sympathy for Tim Cavanaughs repeat TV appearances in which he seems to be able to make both casual and formal wear look odd, as though he's not really comfortable with either, and is stuck in some stylistic forsual limbo. (*talk to Radley. 1 good blazer can do wonders)

    Now Matt - whose couture choices have in the past seemed like a natural, thematic foil to The Jacket (know what I mean? like, if Nick is The Fonze, who the hell is Richie Cunningham? Duh! The guy who dresses like an intellectual young republican pundit but has just that hint of subversive sass about him... the unbuttoned collar w the suit, the occasional tie that makes sure everyone remembers: 'Libertarianism = Conservative; *But Funkier*''; all in all more staid than Nick's steez, equally predictable, and normally always appropriate to the situation.

    That said = WTF is this?

    Are you going to perform a magic trick at some point in the interview?

    Or is your next job working for ....

    Craig Sager?...

    These are the voices I feel *SHOULD* be coming out of that suit =

    'Aw yeah, these dice are hot tonight!...$100 on Hard Eight for me, cover 4 and 6... another $200 in chips... Whoo-hoo, baby! Let's get it ON!...kiss that hand for luck, sweetcheeks...'

    'Sir, this is an *extremely* exclusive club and I'm afraid you are NOT on the VIP list... Serge! Please, help this man... uhh, I so need an Evian...'

    '...allright, Spider Man... you win... '

    'ehh, look - so you got the money? EH? Don't make me come down to where you work you prick. You're makin me look like a jerk here.'

    'Neo... What you think is true is a lie. They never told you about the Green Pill...'

    Sorry... I'm just getting a lot of cognitive dissonance going on here. I would think Fox news had some kind of producer... i don't know... who'd be like, 'get this man a white shirt, stat!'; sorry, sir, it's a policy thing. We have a 'No Matrix-Style' thing in effect. We got sued once...'

  12. GILMORE   14 years ago

    Also...

    'Pellate-able'?

    ...

    jeez. It may have been 'cool' if she said 'gow' instead of GAO... but instead, maybe it's like... she escaped the Buffalo NY area ghetto to rise as a TV host, but on rare occasions her native brogue leaks through...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Coming Techlash Could Kill AI Innovation Before It Helps Anyone

Kevin Frazier | 6.29.2025 7:00 AM

Social Security and Medicare Are Racing Toward Drastic Cuts—Yet Lawmakers Refuse To Act

Veronique de Rugy | 6.29.2025 6:30 AM

Comic: Henry Hazlitt in One Lesson

Peter Bagge | From the July 2025 issue

She Got a Permit for Her Chickens. Now the City Is Fining Her $80,000.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.28.2025 6:30 AM

'We Can't Let These Sheep Go'

Fiona Harrigan | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!