Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Rand Paul vs. Newt Gingrich, Rand Paul vs. Fox News

Jesse Walker | 3.31.2011 2:03 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Rand Paul at the Congressional Correspondents' Dinner last night:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: How Evil Are the Koch Brothers?

Books Editor Jesse Walker is the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PoliticsWorldLibyaRand PaulNewt Gingrich
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (128)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. smalls   14 years ago

    Brave. Not funny.....but brave. Good for him?

  2. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    I think they're doing a pretty good job of leading cheer for bombing while at the same time Obama-bashing. A fairly good balance.

  3. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

    What an idiot, first he bashes Newt Gingrich who has done NOTHING against him.

    Then he bashes Fox News which is the only network that treats him with respect.

    Shame on Rand Paul, shame!

    Separation of common sense and state: Township takes "Easter" out of the egg hunt.
    http://libertarians4freedom.bl.....state.html

    1. MWG   14 years ago

      Barf!

    2. deified   14 years ago

      Donderrrrroooooooooooo!

      1. Otto   14 years ago

        No. If you've been here long enough to know Dondero, you might remember "Neal".

        1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

          Nobody remembers Neal. But Donderoooooo was famous for believing that only the firm hand of authoritarian republicans can guarantee real liberty. He may have also been a blog whore, but I don't recall. I think it's an apt comparison.

          1. Warty   14 years ago

            He also liked to post his cell number and challenge us to call him, remember?

            1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

              But in his defense, posting his number on the internet was the only way to make sure his phone was working.

              1. Warty   14 years ago

                If I remember correctly, he called us pussies because no one called him.

                1. SugarFree   14 years ago

                  Eric Dondero|11.21.07 @ 9:35PM|#|show direct|ignore
                  Isaac, why don't you just pick up the mother-fucking phone and call me direct?

                  If you feel so strongly, want to just let it rip, here's my cell - 832-896-9505.

                  You can even call me tomorrow on Thanksgiving Day. Or even today, which happens to be my 45th Birthday.

                  But don't be surprised if I return the fire.

                  C'mon with it, pussy boy non-Veteran.

                  1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

                    He did that in at least 12 different threads. He must be a lonely guy.

                    Of course, it's not easy to be bottom to a Rudy Guiliani blowup doll.

                  2. Tacos mmm...   14 years ago

                    I'm contemplating calling just to find out if he's one of those guys who gets out of breath from the exertion of answering a phone.

          2. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            Thank you. Besides Dondero is not a blogger.

            1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago


              O RLY?

              1. Warty   14 years ago

                NeoCon Karl Rove blasts libertarian Republican Donald Trump over Birth Certificate stance

                HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                Never change, Dondero. Never change.

                1. SugarFree   14 years ago

                  Of course Dondero is a Birther. Of course he is.

                  1. Warty   14 years ago

                    If you were a libertarian like Donald Trump, you would be too. Do you have a swastika tattooed on your ass or something? Why do you hate America?

                    1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                      Donald Trump is no libertarian, he doesn't want his employees smoking.

                    2. heller   14 years ago

                      Donald Trump is no libertarian, he doesn't want his employees smoking.

                      Brilliant analysis, Gregoooo.

                  2. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

                    OBAMA'S TRUE PLACE OF BIRTH IS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO OUR LIBERTIES IN OUR LIFETIME.

                    1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                      Well, you have to be born in AMERICA to be president of AMERICA. In fact, most countries require that of their president, or do you think you can just move to France and ran for president there?

                      Then again, Mr. Akston, perhaps you are one of those global citizens who likes to imagine that there is no border.

                      Gee Hugh, if there are no borders then why have countries? Maybe you'd like to sing the United Nation's national anthem, or perhaps "La International" is more up your alley?

                    2. Warty   14 years ago

                      perhaps "La International" is more up your alley?

                      A++

                    3. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                      Thank you, Warty. I'm glad someone here remembers Communism which by the way, hasn't died, it has simply evolved into progressivism.

                    4. heller   14 years ago

                      Great trolling Gregooo. Keep it up.

                    5. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

                      Obama has been certified eligible for the presidency by every legal authority in the land. For all intense and porpoises he is the President, and peoples' energies are better spent criticizing his policy decisions than where he fell out of his mother.

                      And yeah, actually, a world without borders (or with borders so porous they might as well not be there) sounds pretty good to me.

                      And I have repeatedly submitted my proposal for the national/world anthem.

                    6. R C Dean   14 years ago

                      Obama has been certified eligible for the presidency by every legal authority in the land.

                      Which is not, of course, the same thing as actually being eligible to be President.

                      [Cue pointlss debate on legal positivism.]

                    7. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                      Hugh, there are so many documents Obama hasn't released, including his certificate of baptism and college transcripts! Think about it, could there not be a conspiracy to certify him eligible for the presidency?

                      I'm starting to think so, even Donald Trump is raising questions.
                      http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

                    8. Ben P.   14 years ago

                      You say 'even Donald Trump is raising questions' as if that is supposed to impress us. As if Donald Trump is a bastion of liberalism, self-restraint, and modest, intellectual discourse whose sudden concerns about the President's citizenship status *should* alarm us.

                      Are we supposed to be impressed that a man most famous for going repeatedly bankrupt and making money again every time by exploiting American fascination with sideshow freaks and celebutard train-wrecks is somehow a political expert?

                      I await your pithy reply that he is somehow more of a political expert than, say, a former community organizer. Go ahead. I'll just wait right here.

                    9. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

                      I think the whole birther phenomena can be condensed down to the fact that Obama the candidate was not really scrutinized very well by main stream media during the election. His speeches were good but lacked substance, he was rarely confronted (Joe the plumber was the closest thing think we got and it was done by some working class d-bag), and every one of his screw ups forgiven and ignored.

                      I think there is a substantial group of people who correctly thought that Obama got a free pass in 2008. Among that group there are those who don't understand it and are incapable of articulating what they are feeling in a rational way.

                      That feeling which was never articulated in the press simply fell into the cracks of conspiracy.

                      So yes Brithers are wrong and irrational...but most importantly they only exist because the press (this means you Weigel) did a shitty job in 2008 and have yet to admit it and correct the record....so the phenomena persists.

                      Note: Weigel was particularly bad on this issue in 2008. Not only did he refuse to cover Obama but instead of actually looking at the candidate focused his reporting on covering birthers.

                      His 2008 election work at reason was pure hackery. It sickened me at the time as it still sickens me today.

                    10. Michael   14 years ago

                      Camacho doesn't need to show you a birth certificate! Fuck you, Gregory Smith!

                    11. joe the mole   14 years ago

                      No, you don't have to be born in AMERICA to be president of AMERICA, you moron. Study some friggin' nationality law before you post something stupid.

              2. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                Well, I saw his blog and have to admit I liked it.

          3. Jack   14 years ago

            I, sir, remember Neal/Caeser with great fondness. There's nothing on Reason now to match his greatness.

          4. Brandybuck   14 years ago

            He was famous for claiming that only active warmongers could be libertarian. His "libertarian republican" blog still routinely bashes libertarians who are not on the side of perpetual war in the Middle East.

    3. D.D. Driver   14 years ago

      Can't say I have an opinion of Fox News one way or another (although I enjoy Red Eye). I also am no big fan of Gingrich.

      BUT...I sort of hate it when speakers pander to an audience like this. Of COURSE the Congressional Correspondents will eat this shit up.

      It reminds me of the Dixie Chicks bashing Bush---in England where it is nice and safe.

      I still love Rand, though.

      1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

        I spent two weeks without watching Fox News in Chicago, I had to put up with CNN and that weirdo with white hair. It felt like the bastard child of Pradva and NPR.

        I recommend Fox News, specially Glenn Beck and The O'Reilly Factor or The Fox Business Network for Judge Napolitano's Freedom Watch.

        BTW, if it wasn't for Fox News, John Stossel would never be on TV. You think the liberal media likes him? Think again.

        1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

          I had a similar experience, except I watched both FOX and CNN in the hotel. Both of them were so insulting to my intelligence that I forgot how to drive.

          And that was just the straight coverage. I would hate to have seen what their commentary programming was like.

          1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            The segments where Bill O'Reilly interviews John Stossel are quite interesting.

            Seriously, until y'all get The Libertarian News Network on TV, the only network you'll ever agree with on many issues is Fox News.

            1. heller   14 years ago

              You just love being Team Red's little slut, don't you Gregooo?

              1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                Any team that lowers my taxes and lets me keep my guns will be my team.

                Of course, you probably voted for Obama because you thought he was going to end war, right? Well, the great Obama is gonna bring more war while raising taxes, keeping people in jail even if they're found innocent, and will eventually confiscate your guns. This I have read in conspiracy websites, and sometimes conspiracies do come true.

                1. heller   14 years ago

                  You're such a stupid fuck, I didn't vote for Obama. Libertarians shouldn't side with either team, they're both statist fucks.

                2. DesigNate   14 years ago

                  Let me know how that works out for you Grego.

            2. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

              Seriously, until y'all get The Libertarian News Network on TV

              I am building a time machine and giving [Adult Swim] circa 2005 its own network.

        2. Bradley   14 years ago

          I recommend Fox News, specially Glenn Beck and The O'Reilly Factor or The Fox Business Network for Judge Napolitano's Freedom Watch.

          Bill O'Reilly: now there's a great libertarian. Yes sir.

        3. deified   14 years ago

          BTW, if it wasn't for Fox News, John Stossel would never be on TV. You think the liberal media likes him? Think again.

          The dude was on 20/20 for over 20 years. That's ABC: network media. He had stand-alone TV specials that were consistently in the Nielsen Top 20.

          Just because he left to get more money at Fox (good for him!) doesn't mean he had no other options.

          1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            Yeah, and why did he have to leave ABC? Because they were CENSORING HIM! They refused to let him do a 20/20 on Obamacare. Seriously, do you people read? I read TWO of Stossel's books. In fact, it's Stossel who praises conservatives for being open minded to his ideas. In fact, when Stossel writes a book is the "rightwing" media that loves interviewing him while The New York Times and the liberal media ignores him. That's the truth and you know it.

        4. CrackertyAssCracker   14 years ago

          If I were forced to watch an entire 24 hours of one of the news networks, I'd have to go with fox. But if were only forced to watch 2 hours of primetime, I'd much rather watch Hardball and Maddow than O'Reilly and Hannity.

          Really the best two hours are Freedom Watch and Redeye though. I actually watch them in their entirety occasionally.

          1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            Maddow and Hardball? Jesus Christ, if you don't watch out you're gonna become a liberal.

            1. dunphy   14 years ago

              maddow is a good journalist. i may completely disagree with her politically, but she's not a hack, and she is very watchable.

              1. Ben P.   14 years ago

                You forget, though, that people like Gregory Smith are often pathologically incapable of admitting that people with whom they disagree are intelligent or talented.

                1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                  You're wrong, I often disagree with Juan Williams yet I'll admit he's intelligent and talented man who's willing to attack BOTH the right and the left unlike Maddow and her ilks of progressive friends.

              2. JT Florida   14 years ago

                I agree.

                Chris Matthews on Hardball is just a loud mouth who says nothing new or interesting. To me, he is just the MSNBC version of Hannity. Maddow, though, gives an interesting and succinct review of the days news through the eyes of a "progressive", "leftist", whatever label you want to apply to her.

        5. CJ   14 years ago

          I recommend Fox News, specially Glenn Beck and The O'Reilly Factor

          It would be really nice if you'd stop lying about who you are by moving your blog to some other URL without "libertarians" in the title. Even someone as awful as Max is at least upfront about his political leanings so that even a casual observer knows what ideology to blame for spawning him.

          1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            Well, I can't call myself conservative, the republicans don't consider me republican, so after examining what libertarianism was I decided that was my political philosophy except for the anti-war part of the platform.

            1. nj   14 years ago

              You are not a libertarian. You are just a conservative with some libertarian leanings.

              1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                Well, whatever, if the GOP can accept Log Cabin Republicans and if CPAC can put up with Rand Paul supporters, I see no reason why a politically incorrect libertarian like me can't opine here. Frankly, y'all reminding me a lot of segregation, do they have separate drinking fountains for PIL libertarians at the LP?

                1. TDL   14 years ago

                  Opine all you want, you ain't a libertarian.

                  Regards,
                  TDL

        6. zoltan   14 years ago

          if it wasn't for Fox News, John Stossel would never be on TV.

          ROFL.

        7. mad libertarian guy   14 years ago

          You mean except for the 28 year TV career he had with ABC BEFORE leaving ABC to go to FOX Business?

    4. affenkopf   14 years ago

      You really do try hard to finally reach the coveted 'most annoying blogwhore on H&R' postition.

    5. kbolino   14 years ago

      I have clicked on a number of your ridiculous links and read your stupid blog. I can say quite honestly that you would fit in much better with conservatives than libertarians.

      1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

        Bullshit, Freerepublic has kicked me out three times. I am a libertarian and I will come here as much as I'd like.

        Besides, the fact that you keep clicking on my links shows you're enjoying my blog. Seriously dude, you're talking like liberals who think advertising makes them buy stuff. "Oh, I didn't want to buy that dress but it was on sale."

        1. kbolino   14 years ago

          Do as you please. I'm not saying where you can or cannot go, I was just suggesting you might find more ideological compatriots among a different group of people.

          Freepers don't count.

          1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            There's quite a few libertarians that admit supporting me in private, you'd be surprised.

            1. Moron   14 years ago

              What's to prevent these "quite a few libertarians" from voicing their support from you here? I mean, apart from the fact that they don't exist.

              It's not as though there are any actual consequences to be suffered, particularly behind the curtain of anonymity provided by this blog.

            2. jacob   14 years ago

              They do it in private because it's too fucking embarrassing.

  4. SIV   14 years ago

    Speaking of bombing...

  5. Chydenian   14 years ago

    It's very shameful of Rand Paul.

    Shameful of him for not running for President...

  6. kilroy   14 years ago

    He is his father's son.

  7. Tim Cavanaugh   14 years ago

    So the negative correlation remains 100 percent: Any actually funny line at a correspondents dinner will get no laughs.

    1. Hugh Akston   14 years ago

      The lines themselves may have been funny, but the man has no comic timing.

      1. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

        I think I agree with Rand to much to find humor in what he said.

        Plus yeah his timing was off.

      2. Otto   14 years ago

        Agreed. Also, the bit about the conflict at Fox News would have had to have been played much "bigger" to be funny.

      3. JT Florida   14 years ago

        You beat me to it.

        I found his comments funnier when I saw them in print, before I actually heard him deliver the lines.

    2. Tim   14 years ago

      The truth hurts. Paul needs to work on his delivery. These are the facts:
      1. Gingrich has more wives than an arab potentate.
      2. Fox is conflicted.
      3. I am absolutely not kissing up, Cavanaugh you charming, erudite bastard.

      1. rather   14 years ago

        4. He was only funny when he made off the cuff remarks that weren't meant to be funny

  8. rather   14 years ago

    I posted this ealier. I want a hat tip bitches

    1. Tim   14 years ago

      I saw you not post it. This being the internet you can't not, not disprove anything. Not.

      1. rather   14 years ago

        when are you going to stop raping Girl Scouts Tim?

    2. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

      This is a disadvantage of using reason to generate hits.

      Your consumers will read reason before we read your blog.

  9. rather   14 years ago

    My headline is so much better too
    http://rctlfy.wordpress.com/20.....terrorist/

    1. affenkopf   14 years ago

      Step up your game if you want to remain the most annoying blogwhore on H&R. Donderoooooo is closing in.

      1. Otto   14 years ago

        It's Neal, not Dondero. Dondero would have been unable to conceal his anger at Ron Paul for this length of time.

        1. SugarFree   14 years ago

          While I don't have an answer to the conundrum, the "Neil" faction seems to be ignoring the fact that no matter how aggressively ignorant, petulant, paranoid, and provincial Greg is, there are millions of real GOP voters that believe and behave exactly like he does. This means that one of them finding us is not that unlikely. Especially with our track record of attracting broken personalities with an anti-libertarian ax to grind... not to mention all the stealth GOP "libertarians" on here that are undoubtedly real people.

          1. Clich? Bandit   14 years ago

            you bring up a good point. But I must say that this:

            Bullshit, Freerepublic has kicked me out three times. I am a libertarian and I will come here as much as I'd like.

            smacks of intentional amature. I am now completly conflicted on the Gregoooooo identity conspiracy.

          2. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

            Provincial eh? You must be one of those global citizen that would like to sing with all the children of the world.

            Tell me, why do you hate the right more than the left? I admit that the right annoys me on a few minor issues like abortions and their stance against gay rights, but they're so wonderful with almost everything else.

            I mean, will life end if the GOP opposes legalizing same-sex marriage? Of course not!

            Yet some of you libertarians seem to have no trouble hanging out with the left while bitching about the right.

            1. heller   14 years ago

              Yet some of you libertarians seem to have no trouble hanging out with the left while bitching about the right.

              No, you just think that because we are criticizing you for being rightwing, so you automatically assume that we are pro-left. Typical two-party cheerleader thinking.

              1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                I'm only "rightwing" when it comes to war, the border, English-only, patriotism, and a few tiny issues like that. On everything else I'm freedomwing. Want to have an abortion? Go ahead! Just don't do it with my money, thank you very much.

                1. The Ingenious Hidalgo   14 years ago

                  "The border" is not a tiny issue. What you're saying is you're for freedom of association - but only within predetermined groups of people. If a guy from Texas wants to rent his loft to a Mexican, it's none of your business, and if a guy in New York wants to give a Chilean a job, that's none of your business either. And English only? What the fuck?

                  1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                    Freedom of association is letting any illegal come here? Are you kidding me?

                    1. The Ingenious Hidalgo   14 years ago

                      No, freedom of association is me letting anyone I want into my house. Including foreigners.

                    2. Old Mexican   14 years ago

                      Re: Gregory Smith,

                      Freedom of association is letting any illegal come here? Are you kidding me?

                      Greg, you're conflating two different issues, one having to do with liberty and the other to do with the State. They are NOT compatible.

                      A so-called "illegal immigrant" is so only by the State's fiat. If a person comes from another land, rents or buys a place to stay in a totally voluntary transaction with a renter or seller, and obtains employment in a totally voluntary way with an employer, then why would it be an issue whether that person asked the State permission or not? The person committed no immoral or unethical act so far. Saying "because the law says so" only makes you look the more silly, as such argument is circular.

                  2. dunphy   14 years ago

                    and no true scotsman arguments aside, being pro border enforcement doesn't automatically mean one can't be a libertarian (small "l").

                2. Jim   14 years ago

                  That's a pretty serious list which would make many neutral observers believe that you are not, in fact, libertarian. You may be a mix of libertarian and conservative, and that's fine; human thought cannot be prepackaged into a series of mutually exclusive boxes. But IMO you're no more a libertarian than you are a conservative. You're something else entirely.

                  And yes, I want to live in a world with no artificial lines drawn by dead politicians which purport to dictate to me whom I may and may not conduct free economic exchanges with.

                  True story: on Monday of this week, my garbage disposal broke. I called several plumbers and got quotes. Then I went to the day-labor center, and asked them which guy they use for their plumbing. The "legal" jackasses wanted anywhere from $135 - $150 to do the job. My illegal did it just fine for $50. Why do you believe in using the law to force me to accept uncompetitive wages, and prevent my freedom of economic transaction?

                  1. Gregory Smith   14 years ago

                    So what should I call myself? Independent? I hate that term.

                    Well, good luck with the garbage disposal, if however that thing breaks again, good luck getting the illegal to repair it for free as most legal companies would do. My brother in law is a contractor and he knows all the dangers of hiring unlicensed contractors.

                    1. Jim   14 years ago

                      You're free to call yourself whatever you want, it just seems that "libertarian" doesn't really describe you any better than "republican" would.

                      And living in the southwest, I'm well aware of the quality dangers involved. But from my experience, they may really seriously fuck up about 20% of the time, whereas a more expensive pro will maybe 5% of the time. But I still save so much money using cheaper labor, that I come out ahead even given their higher instances of fuck-up-ery. So far the disposal has worked fine, but even if he charged me full price to come out again, I'd have to have him over two more times before I'd incur any costs above having hired the legal guy in the first place. It's a risk / reward calculation that border fanatics don't believe I'm qualified to make on my own, because our gov't overlords know what's best for us.

                    2. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

                      So what should I call myself? Independent? I hate that term.

                      You are a conservative libertarian or a libertarian conservative. Take your pick.

                      I find much of your list contradictory with libertarianism...but fuck it, its a big tent welcome to the party.

                      Still wandering around drunk and yelling at all of us for being lefty lovers will not gain you many friends.

                      I know from experience =)

                    3. Moe19   14 years ago

                      "...the dangers of hiring unlicensed contractors."

                      WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!1!

                      Some of us are smart enough to do our own DD on who we want to hire, not just those that paid the state for a stupid license.

                      Jerkoff.

                    4. mad libertarian guy   14 years ago

                      SOMALIA!!!!!!!

      2. Warty   14 years ago

        Rectal's game is stepped up as far as it steps, dude. Just incif her to avoid brain injury and continue throwing insults.

        1. rather   14 years ago

          poor baby, is it hard to pretend you aren't reading every word?

          1. Rather Retarded   14 years ago

            You can't ignore me Warty, you love me, everyone loves me, I am beloved!

            1. The Internets   14 years ago

              STOP teasing rather.

              She once got 200 blog hits.

              200!

              1. rather   14 years ago

                I get two hundred everyday by noon

        2. Warty   14 years ago

          The best part about insulting rectal is the little greyed out post that appears a few minutes later, all full of poorly-expressed rage and terrible masturbation-themed insults. Sometimes I regret missing out on it. But then I'll see someone quote her, and I know I made the right decision.

          1. rather   14 years ago

            masturbation-themed insults

            Holy shit, Warty is Madam Cleo!

          2. Spazmo   14 years ago

            YES. I get a semi boner every time I see that tiny, pathetic, italicized rather appear on my screen. Feels good man.

    2. Old Mexican   14 years ago

      Re: rather,

      My headline is so much better too

      It was mostly tongue-in-cheek, which I don't find amusing. I prefer tongue-in-snatch. But, that's just me.

      1. rather   14 years ago

        Do you toss salad?

        1. Rather Retarded   14 years ago

          I love tossing Daddy's salad.

  10. Tim   14 years ago

    Rand, on box, mocks Fox.

    1. Anarchosubmissive wifey   14 years ago

      Mock Fox, mock!

  11. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

    It appears Rush has made the decision that bashing Obama was more important then bombing the middle east.

    Also if Libya is the middle east then where is north Africa?

    Lastly I am so happy that Rand will be there for 6 years giving shit to the Republicans that i really cannot contain myself.

    1. Sudden   14 years ago

      Also if Libya is the middle east then where is north Africa?

      Admittedly, the thing I like about the whole "Libya=MidEast" meme is that I can now in good conscience start referring to Italy, Germany, et al as the Northern Middle East, which given the percentage of their populations that believes Allah is the one true God and Mohammad his prophet, isn't entirely incorrect demographically speaking.

      1. Ska   14 years ago

        Rommel commanded the Middleeasternkorps, right?

      2. R C Dean   14 years ago

        Well, Libya is next to a country that's next to the Middle East. Close enough for journalism work!

        1. Mo   14 years ago

          SoS Dulles included Libya in the Middle East, your beef is with him.

    2. Mo   14 years ago

      I did not realize that regions couldn't overlap. Is Egypt in the MidEast or North Africa?

  12. Brian from Texas   14 years ago

    At times Rand can certainly be his father's son. Good for him.

  13. Jerry   14 years ago

    That SNL line was pretty good.

  14. blubi   14 years ago

    Congressional correspondents is about an evening without partisanship and having a laugh, which usually revolves around selfdeprecating humour. Jokes about someone else?s wives is a crass cheap shot. Rand?s ideological fervour and ego are being mixed with poor results. Here he comes across as mean-spirited, his previous rant about toilet flushes made him look ridiculous.
    Fame has strange effects on the brain.

    1. Old Mexican   14 years ago

      Re: blubi,

      Fame has strange effects on the brain.

      So, it would seem, obsession...

    2. Joshua Corning   14 years ago

      Jokes about someone else?s wives is a crass cheap shot.

      Some circles find it crass to ditch one's wife for a younger women.

      I am not in that circle, me being, at least in theory, libertine...still if I don't find running out on one's wife crass I certainly can't find making jokes about it crass either.

  15. Old Mexican   14 years ago

    Re: Gregory Smith,

    Freedom of association is letting any illegal come here? Are you kidding me?

    Greg, you're conflating two different issues, one having to do with liberty and the other to do with the State. They are NOT compatible.

    A so-called "illegal immigrant" is so only by the State's fiat. If a person comes from another land, rents or buys a place to stay in a totally voluntary transaction with a renter or seller, and obtains employment in a totally voluntary way with an employer, then why would it be an issue whether that person asked the State permission or not? The person committed no immoral or unethical act so far. Saying "because the law says so" only makes you look the more silly, as such argument is circular.

  16. jacob   14 years ago

    I FUCKING LOVE RAND PAUL!

    Newt Gingrich is a moron, it's nice to see other Republicans call him out. If Newt Gingrich runs, we can guarantee another 4 yrs for Obama.

  17. Cytotoxic   14 years ago

    Wow, Gregory Smith has trolled the shit out of this thread. It's all but official.

    His timing was off, but I don't care. I still think Rand be much better running for GOP candidate than his father.

    1. mad libertarian guy   14 years ago

      The timing is bad.

      He'll be unelectable in 2012 because of his "inexperience" (as if that fucking matters), and 2016 he'll be busy running for re-election.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Cursing Ain't Allowed in School

Charles Oliver | 5.19.2025 4:00 AM

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!