Truth-Out Makes Case for Garden State Privatization
In a very late hit on Gov. Chris Christie's New Jersey Privatization Task Force, Truth-Out's Ellen Dannin questions the $210 million in savings the task force's 10-month-old report [pdf] estimates the state would realize by selling off some government services:
On page 14 the report says it did no analysis "due not only to the fact that the actual cost of a privatized alternative will often not be known until the end of a full fledged competitive bidding process, but also because New Jersey state government agencies have difficulty calculating with precision the full cost of functions currently performed at the state level." So, the sunny claims of big savings for the people of New Jersey are a guestimate, at best. And "To Be Decided" is the most accurate statement in the report.
With this cleverly selected caveat, Dannin makes the stealth case for privatization. The quoted matter states the central reason a public bidding process is preferable to the status quo: that it would allow competition for the state's very scarce dollars.
Even more deftly understated is Dannin's reference to the real scandal here: New Jersey's government employees are already having "difficulty calculating with precision the full costs" of functions they are currently being paid to perform. Every New Jerseyan should be outraged by this cavalier approach to spending the people's money, and Truth-Out should be commended for providing supporting evidence for Christie's reform effort.
Cleverest of all is the article's red-herring lead. In fact the privatization task force did crunch the numbers for 100 percent of its claimed savings. The itemization leaves all the TBDs out of its total. Counting just the substantiated numbers, we get to $210.14 million, which the task force modestly describes as "$210 million+." Any savings from the TBDs would be on top of this. Thanks to Truth-Out for highlighting the fact that Christie's privatization team, unlike New Jersey's government employees, is scrupulous about substantiating its claims.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, the sunny claims of big savings for the people of New Jersey are a guestimate, at best.
And the good people of New Jerksey are accustomed to government providing these services. Letting some non-government person (a Christie crony perhaps?!?) do them moves citizens out of their comfort zone.
Also, you know what else is a guestimate? The name of which contributor wrote this post.
It's not angry enough to be TC, MW, or NG. Not enough literary or pop culture references for BD. So maybe the excellent STEPHEN J SMITH.
Ha. And now it's just been signed. TC must have just eaten a bacon wrapped hotdog to be so gentle with this topic.
Radley Balko linked a story on his web page that says "Minnesota legislators are apparently considering a law that would make it criminal for people on public assistance to carry cash." That is false and there is nothing in the bill that says that. If you guys are going to be taken seriosly you need to be more careful. Balko plays to the anarchy crowd that account for about 60% of his comments. Not going to make it too far with reasonable folks.
Here, come join me at the adults table! Open wide!
No hop-ons.
Go back to your basement - mommy's calling you
Yes that link that Balko prefaces with "not sure about the source here" in his Sunday links totally destroys the credibility not just of his work but also Cato and Reason.
If you know the source is shit, (I do because I live in MPLS) then why repeat it? You repeat it because you have an agenda and the truth no longer matters.
Agenda:
Pot good
haircuts bad
white men bad
illegal aliens good
Rush Limbaugh bad
open mouth homosexual kissing(men) good
Obama good
etc
Not going to make it too far with reasonable folks.
drink!
New Jersey state government agencies have difficulty calculating with precision the full cost of functions currently performed at the state level.
No kidding.
These functions are so desperately vital, however, that no price is too high.
Meanwhile, one of the Detroit papers (and no, I ain't got no linky) ran a long and impassioned editorial which says turning a group of completely failed and worthless public schools into charter schools is a terrible idea, because the public school system deserves another chance. And more money.
YOU'RE JUST NOT HITTING IT HARD ENOUGH!
The article provides more evidence - if any is needed - that Michigan and Detroy-it are models for the rest of the country on how to balance a budget and implement effective government.
So much fail in one place - it's almost like they were doin it wrong or something....
Here's a list of NJ agencies I just pulled off their state website:
Administrative Law, Office of
Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, Governor's Council on
Board of Public Utilities
Brain Injury Research, New Jersey Commission on
Building Authority
Cancer Research, New Jersey Commission on
Capital City Redevelopment Corporation
Casino Control Commission
Casino Revenue Fund Advisory Commission
Child Advocate, Office of the
Civil Service Commission
Clean Air Council
Comptroller, Office of the
Corrections Ombudsman
Criminal History Review - Fingerprinting, ePayments
Delaware River Basin Commission
Developmental Disabilities, New Jersey Council on
Economic Development Authority
Educational Facilities Authority (NJEFA)
Election Law Enforcement (Campaign and Lobbying Disclosure)
Emergency Management
Energy Master Plan
Environmental Infrastructure Trust
Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Planning Authority (FMERPA)
Garden State Preservation Trust
Global Warming
Government Records Council
Governor, Office of the
Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (NJHCFFA)
Higher Education, Commission on
Higher Education Student Assistance Authority
Highlands Council
Historic Trust (NJHT)
Homeland Security
Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency
Housing Resource Center (NJHRC)
Information Technology
Institutionalized Elderly, Office of the Ombudsman for the
Interstate Environmental Commission
Investigation, State Commission of
Lottery
Local Mandates, Council on
Local Unit Alignment, Reorganization and Consolidation Commission (LUARCC)
Medicaid Inspector General, Office of the
Mental Health Stigma, Governor's Council on
Motor Vehicle Commission
Meadowlands Commission
Mediation (NJSBM), New Jersey State Board of
New Jersey Network (NJN)
Ombudsman for the Institutionalized Elderly, Office of the
Pinelands Commission
Pinelands Development Credit Bank
Police Standards, Advisory Committee on
Professional Boards and Advisory Committees
Public Defender, Office of the
Public Employment Relations Commission
Rate Counsel, Division of
Real Estate Commission
Redevelopment Authority (NJRA)
Schools Development Authority
Science and Technology, Commission on
Spinal Cord Research, New Jersey Commission on
State Casino Reinvestment Development Authority
State Employment and Training Commission
State Ethics Commission
State Parole Board
State Police, New Jersey
Transit, New Jersey
Transportation Trust Fund Authority (TTFA)
Turnpike Authority
Victims of Crime Compensation Agency
Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
I can pick about a dozen that ought not to exist at all, much less be privatized.
I can pick about a dozen that ought not to exist at all, much less be privatized.
I'll start with: Criminal History Review - Fingerprinting, ePayments; Global Warming; Mental Health Stigma, Governor's Council on; and Rate Counsel, Division of.
Don't start with this Council. You know how we get.
How about:
Brain Injury Research, New Jersey Commission on
See it's not just the government agencies that sit around and do useless things or do nothing at all, it's also the ones that might theoretically do important things but are completely superfluous due to private activity.
There is _big_ money being made in the treatment of brain injuries and research into further treatments and means of prevention. My mother, sister and aunt all had brain surgeries by the same doctor (the same guy who did Ryan Westmoreland of the Red Sox) and this dude flosses his teeth with gold chains. He also takes patients from the state run insurance program for low income folks.
What exactly does the New Jersey Commission on Brain Injury Research bring to the table other than an opportunity for graft?
One damn fine logo!
This is better.
Oh, and the Highlands Council. That's obviously racist.
Please don't lose the Council on Local Mandates! What a cool name! Plus, they probably have renewed vitality now that the President is not enforcing the DOMA.
THOSE ARE ALL VITAL SERVICES FOR TEH PEEOPLEZ OF NEW JOISEY! TO END ANY OF THEM WILL ONLY LEAD TO ANARCHYCHAOSSOMALIAOLDPEOPLEINTHESTREETSFIRESTSUNAMIDANGERWILLROBINSON!!!!11ONE!!!
Roads!
New Jersey's government employees are already having "difficulty calculating with precision the full costs" of functions they are currently being paid to perform.
Resolved: The full cost of a function is the salaries, benefits, pensions, and overhead of all employees tasked to perform a component of that function summed over the duration of the function. Was that so hard?
We figured out that low estimate, schmuck! Now come up with a precision calculation, including second- and third-order effects. Show your work.
You can leave out the EXTERNALITIES though, because government doesn't create those.
What are these "EXTERNALITIES" to which you refer?
I'm surprised you didn't dig into the real meat of the article, the incredibly weak arguments against privatization itself:
Typical statist ROADZ!!!11 fallacy. If we didn't have government schools, no one would educate these dumb kids! Supply and demand, how the fuck does it work?
Yes, because that's what happens when you work in the private sector. Workers get paid so little that they don't do their jobs! Oh, and if we taxpayers don't pay for all the bloated public sector workers' salaries, they might have to pay for part of the cost of the private sector workers that replace them! We must pay it all otherwise we pay less!
Examples of government services that were taken over because of private sector failures? Nope, guess not. Just going to assert a historical claim with no historical evidence.
Lack of accountability led to overcharging, poor or no service, and corruption in the past
EXACTLY - this kind of government ineptitude is why they need to privatize.
Oh, wait, they meant....
Sounds like he's making an argument for vouchers.
Fucking accounting and budget forecasting - how does it work?
Shit like this almost makes me an antitrust fan:
I'm sure they'll look about as hard as Obama does at entitlement cuts.
AT&T was just pissed off about the commercials. Buying T-mobile was the only way they could get them off the air.
We need to pool our resources to buy Old Navy then.
Even more deftly understated is Dannin's reference to the real scandal here: New Jersey's government employees are already having "difficulty calculating with precision the full costs" of functions they are currently being paid to perform.
Well, no. They have people in the legislature appropriating money who (or at least whose staff) know to the dollar how much they are appropriating. A more accurate statement is likely that those government employees are understandably reluctant to publicize how much what they do costs, so they are stonewalling by feigning ignorance.
Interesting News! I just now printed Coupons of my Favorite Brands and saved!! search for "printapons" online and save instantly, it is free
Hey sevo imagine that a state wanting to sell off some of it's assets to try and balance it's budget. Capital assets , like roads, at that.
due not only to the fact that the actual cost of a privatized alternative will often not be known until the end of a full fledged competitive bidding process, but also because New Jersey state government agencies have difficulty calculating with precision the full cost of functions currently performed at the state level.
Ummmm....WHAT?
One way out of this quandary is to incrementally decrease the funding of these functions, and when their performance stops you have bracketed the cost.
Stop Making Sense
"The real scandal here: New Jersey's government employees are already having "difficulty calculating with precision the full costs" of functions they are currently being paid to perform."
Tim, this is Bureaucracy 101! A good bureaucrat never is able to calculate the actual cost of what he or she does, because this would allow for the very type of cost-benefit analysis on which privatization is based. One cannot determine potential savings if one cannot determine the present cost, now can one?
The counter-argument is that the state is selling off its services to the lowest bidder, which somehow means the lowest quality or something. To me, it sounds more like the fewest cronies.
Right, but bidding processes are very specific about scope of work and deliverables, so again you have a more open and honest process for determining the cost. For reasons of her own, Dannin seems to think it's a scandal that a bidding process doesn't produce a final price until a bid has been accepted.