Unknown
Liam Neeson on the run
Berlin is no longer the entertaining cesspool of espionage and political intrigue that it was when Cold War operatives like George Smiley and Harry Palmer skulked its shadowy streets. But in the new movie Unknown, the once-divided metropolis provides a sufficiently sinister environment for Martin Harris, a visiting American who's as dangerously out of his element as Joseph Cotten's Holly Martins was in the postwar Vienna of The Third Man. Although let me apologize in advance for mentioning that movie in the vicinity of this one.
Harris (Liam Neeson), a world-famous Chicago botanist, has flown to Berlin to attend an international biotech conference with his sleek blonde wife, Elizabeth (January Jones). Arriving at their deluxe hotel, he realizes that his briefcase—idiotically containing his passport and all other forms of identification—has been left behind at the airport. Without saying a word to Elizabeth, who's already checking in, he hops in a taxi to go back and reclaim it. As you'd hope, everything that could possibly go wrong now begins to do so.
The movie has a Hitchcockian complement of plot twists and fake-outs. (If only it also had Hitchcock.) En route to the airport, there's a traffic pileup, and Harris' taxi goes sailing off a bridge into the River Spree. His cabbie, a Bosnian immigrant named Gina (Diane Kruger, possibly the least Balkan of actresses), pulls her unconscious passenger out of the water to safety, then disappears. Four days later Harris awakes from a coma in a hospital, where a doctor natters on about memory loss and disorientation. There's a television in the room, on which Harris sees a news report about the big biotech conference, and a shot of the hotel into which he has still failed to check. Fleeing the hospital, he goes there, spots his wife in a salon and approaches her. She greets him with the words, "Do I know you?" Then she introduces her husband, the world-famous botanist Martin Harris, who looks for all the world like Aidan Quinn. The real Harris implores the hotel security chief to look him up online, which he does—and pulls up a photo of, yes, Aidan Quinn. (How this might have been arranged we can leave to the puzzlement of anyone who's ever done Internet research.)
Now things get really hectic. Harris finds himself being stalked by a vicious assassin (grim-lipped Olivier Schneider). Fortuitously, he makes a connection with a crusty investigator, a former East German spy named Jürgen (Bruno Ganz), who believes his wild story. Then Gina the cabbie re-enters the picture; she sort of believes Harris, too. Unbelievably, she also allows this virtual stranger to crash in her tiny apartment. But not for long—very soon they're on the run, pursued by killers for reasons Harris can't begin to fathom. Also arriving in the story are an Arab prince (Mido Hamada), who funds biotech projects; a pioneering German scientist named Bressler (Sebastian Koch, of The Lives of Others); and a heinous plot, a mysterious book code, an international murder bureau, a ticking bomb, and identity games that really do keep you guessing (but not, alas, as long as they should). As a final complication, there's Harris' longtime friend Rodney Cole (Frank Langella), who arrives toward the end to make himself useful and, let's say, fails to do so.
Spanish director Jaume Collet-Serra (whose 2009 Orphan was a nifty little horror flick) keeps all of this moving along at a snappy pace. Even the bad-guy beat-downs and the inevitable car chase through the icy streets of Berlin are excitingly staged, as such things go; and an assault in the hospital has a nice compact nastiness. Plot holes are a minor distraction in this sort of film (the preposterous ending here is more of a problem), but what really keeps the movie from being a solid genre gem is its star. Neeson's expertise at projecting inner turbulence and fine emotional shadings overbalances this pulpy tale, and as has been the case in some previous films (even Taken, I'd say), his air of earnest contemplation grows dull. More surprising than any of the other rub-outs on view is the way it smothers the movie.
Kurt Loder is a writer, among other things, embedded in New York.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Actually, no movie should be put in the vicinity of The Third Man.
Very funny movie review, a type of writing that's sorely lacking.
A great, great film. With possibly the greatest set up and entrance in film history.
Not to mention greats like Graham Greene, Orson Welles, Joseph Cotten, Trevor Howard, and the zither.
IT'S ON INSTANT WATCH ON NETFLIX!!!!!!!!
One of the few DVDs I actually own.
I also like Greene's books quite a bit.
I've never seen it, maybe I'll rent it. I just watched the trailer on IMDB, and it was incredibly bad.
Don't know about the trailer, but I highly recommend the movie.
Like most things Orson...overblown, hyper intellectualized and generally pretty fucking dull...rosebud
oh yeah, suck my zither...
a pioneering German scientist named Bressler (Sebastian Koch, of The Lives of Others
Kochtopus!!!!!!eleventy!!!1!!1!!
EXACTLY my reaction. They're It's fucking everywhere...
That's "C-o-t-t-e-n," if you please. I don't cotton to misspellings of "Cotten." Great actor. Good buddy to Orson Welles. Et cetera.
And Endora.
That's COTTEN, with an "e," not COTTON. Have some respect for ol' Joe!
Thanks, Erik. Spellcheck sabotage...
Gotta disagree about the Neeson. He brings a Heston-in-The-Omega-Man gravitas to a completely comic book part in Taken, and is the only reason the whole movie doesn't come off like Frank Drebin fighting an assassin with a toothbrush in The Naked Gun. What would be silliness with someone else works once the Neeson applies his patented Constipation-of-the-Gods persona to it.
Agreed.
Dude actualyl makes a LOT of sense when you think about it.
http://www.total-online-privacy.us.tc
You failed, spam bot. And to think, I had such high hopes for you.
You know what's going to suck ten times more than this though? Matt Damon's new movie.
Yet another move inspired by a Phillip K. Dick story. I mean, I like Dick as much as the next guy (ha ha, go ahead, get it out of your system) but there are many other, better sci-fi writers.
Yes, but for some reason his work seems to be very adaptable to film. Blade Runner, Total Recall, Minority Report, A Scanner Darkly, were all awesome. And then you have the not so great Paycheck and Next.
PayReport and Minority Check were the same movie, imo.
Maybe plotwise, but Tom Cruise vs. Ben Affleck?
a really nifty Death Match?
Philip K. Dick's storys are 'adaptable' to movies because they're so short that they have almost no bearing on what the movie ends up as. They're basically plot synopses that they can flesh out a movie into.
This is my opinion as well. It's not like most of those movies followed the books very well.
Poor Asimov is also a victim of this.
Any relation to Issac? or just another almanac writer.
welcome toEnfant Doudoune Skishop.
Thanks for your share chaussures nike air jordanvery good.
I loved Taken. Is there a problem?
But you repeat yourself.
I liked Taken too. Especially the first hour.
Taken was good but it jumped the shark when Neeson got away from the auctioneer's henchmen by pulling the pipe support out of the ceiling after noticing it was loose. Oh c'mon man!
Agreed. Worst part of the movie and it was the scene that really makes it suffer when compared to something like the Bourne movies. Bourne and his pursuers are all proficient killers. The audience understands that Bourne won't ever be captured; he'll be killed, thus he has to kill or incapacitate his enemies very quickly and efficiently. Having Neeson's character in Taken captured made it more too James Bond instead of Jason Bourne.
But that said I still like the movie and will go see Unknown.
but remember, this was after he saw his daughter, and took a hostage. he wasnt perfect, and that time it cost him.
good
again.
Every day we face with countertop,you can have a high quality of life with granite countertop of yalitongstone,but we will also very pleased if you can see Huaxingstone's granite countertop
I agree with Jessie. People shouldn't act this way !
ThaNk U
afgasgzx