So. About Those Medicare Cuts…


Dr. Giggles will be happy to make some cuts for you.

James Capretta, a former budget official in the Bush administration, testified before the House Budget Committee yesterday on the budgetary effects of the new health care overhaul. His testimony, which lays out problems with the health care overhaul in the context of the nation's larger budget problems, is worth reading in full. He's especially good on explaining exactly why the law's supposed Medicare savings are likely to prove illusory:

The largest spending reduction in Medicare comes from automatic reductions in the inflation updates for hospitals and other institutional providers of care. The notional rationale is that these cuts represent productivity improvement in the various institutions getting Medicare payments. The reductions, amounting to a 0.4-0.5 percentage point reduction off the normal inflation update for Medicare payments, will occur every year, in perpetuity. The compounding effect of doing this on a permanent basis would be massive savings in Medicare — if they really were implemented. CBO says the cuts will generate $156 billion over the first decade alone.

But there are strong reasons to suspect these cuts will not be sustained. Medicare's actuarial team, led by Richard Foster, has warned repeatedly that these cuts are not viable over the medium and long-term because they would jeopardize access to care for seniors. The cuts would push average Medicare payments to levels that are below what Medicaid is expected to pay, and the network of providers willing to take care of Medicaid patients is notoriously constrained. It is hard to imagine political leaders allowing Medicare to become less attractive to those providing services than Medicaid is today.

It's worth noting here that these cuts in payment rates do not constitute "delivery system reform," which the administration has often stated is what it is trying to achieve with the Medicare changes in the new law. These cuts in inflation updates will hit every institution equally, without regard to whether or not the institution is treating its patients well or badly. The savings that are expected from other reforms, such as Accountable Care Organizations, are minor by comparison.

So the official scores for the health overhaul assume that Medicare will end up like Medicaid, with payment rates so low that many doctors refuse to take new patients. And it assumes that at the same as these relatively radical cuts are being made, medical providers will somehow make their practices more efficient and cost-effective. Given that Congress has for years overridden Medicare provider reimbursements—reimbursement cuts called for by a plan that Congress implemented to rein in Medicare spending—even when they were relatively small, does this seem likely? 

Medicare costs need to be controlled, and an overhaul of the program's financing may well be necessary. But it's a mistake to think that cost control can be achieved by relying on a more extreme version of the sort of provider reimbursement cuts that Congress has historically refused to make.

NEXT: Meet Senator Asshat, Representing North Douchington

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I hope Charlie Sheen isn’t on Medicare.

  2. Those aren’t the Medicare cuts you’re looking for.

  3. The obvious solution is to convert Medicare to a voucher system. Those imputed productivity improvements aren’t happening because there’s no market for them: consumers see no price signals.

    1. The obvious solution is the scrap heap of failed programs.

      Only, that scrap heap does not exist in a past-tense.

  4. Medicare is an absolutely disgrace. Beneficiaries mostly love it because it pays most of the bills, but it has wrecked whatever was left of a health care marketplace. Feds pay for over 50% of HC costs in the US and heavily dictate the rules for the other 50%. Please remind all of your “progressive” friends that healthcare hasn’t resembled anything close to a free market since WW2.

    Obamacare has completed the process. It tells insurers who their customers should be, how much they can charge, how much they must spend on specific activities, and how much profit they can make. But don’t worry, we will leave you with 5% to do whatever you want and INNOVATE! Oh, what’s that, you can’t? The free market has failed and government can do it better. We might as well build a whole ‘nother NIH branch to start discovering new drugs!

  5. what a good article is! Thanks for the superior content , I am benefited from it rattling untold!
    Wish to get solon entropy and knowledge from you in the coming days, I testament e’er validation you!every dimension I indicate your articles,which module free me a surprise! the articles are always reformatory for me!I get author and region aggregation and popularity from your articles,so that I can make up with the steps of the association!
    I am impatient to get solon and writer stylish aggregation from you, hope that you can apportion with me selflessly in the emerging life!Impart you really more!

  6. This website printapons and retail me not very beneficial to increasing the speed of online shopping as well as the ease of finding the best price and coupons, which is the whole reason for shopping online.

  7. The shorter version of the same point: We shouldn’t cut spending now, because if we do, a future Congress might repeal those spending cuts.

  8. Medicare is an absolutely disgrace. Beneficiaries mostly love it because it pays most of the bills, but it has wrecked whatever was left of a health care marketplace.bottes hiver?

  9. what a good article is! Thanks for the superior content , I am benefited from it rattling untold!

  10. I am so happy with these pants, the picture really does no justice for them. they are much nicer on than i expected.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.