The Supreme Court and the State of the Union
The Wall Street Journal's Jess Bravin says six members of the Supreme Court are attending tonight's unity-themed State of the Union address, including Chief Justice John Roberts. Justice Samuel Alito, who famously shook his head in dissent last year when the president criticized the Court's Citizens United ruling, will be putting his time to better use in sunny Hawaii, where he's preparing to give a lecture to the state bar. Here's Bravin on who will make it:
Several justices long have felt it inappropriate to attend the annual presidential speech, regardless of partisan stripe. Justices Antonin Scalia and John Paul Stevens, who retired last year, often dueled over constitutional interpretation, but both typically skipped the State of the Union. Justice Clarence Thomas sometimes attends, but didn't last year. On the other hand, some justices, particularly Stephen Breyer, believe it's important to take their place in the tableau, visually signifying that all three branches ultimately are part of the same American experiment in self-governance.
In addition to Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer, Tuesday's high court procession likely will include Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Mr. Obama's two appointees, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Since this means we probably won't enjoy any more static between the executive and judicial branches tonight, why not watch last year's big brouhaha one more time:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So the waffler, all 4 liberals and the guy kinda obligated to show up to make it look like it isn't all liberals that showed up thus compromising the court he leads. Interesting.
I would love to see Roberts NOT show up. Such drama! We need something that can compete with the return of One Tree Hill.
Also, could Ginsburg look any older or more Jewish than in that YouTube scene? Just saying.
He has to. If no conservatives show and all 4 liberals show, the court he oversees will look like it is split along partisan lines. I get the feeling he doesn't want to perpetuate that image.
The court isn't split along partisan lines?
So the court isn't generally seen as 4 conservative, 4 liberals, and one swing vote? With some crossing lines here and there for different reasons?
Fucking H&R eating ma posts. AAARRRHHHGGGG.
There was even more? I feel cheated.
It was chocked full of total awesomeness. I even included a picture of Thomas riding a unicorn.
Good grief, looks like the Crypt Keeper in the front row wearing glasses.
I think the most important thing to remember is that how ever many of them show up, they are still all surgical hermaphrodites.
Yes, yes, we're all big fans.
You know who else didn't regularly attend the president's State of the Union Addresses?
99.999833334% of Americans?
Jesus Christ, it's Hitler! The answer is always Hitler.
And, in this case, also Jesus Christ.
He was there in spirit.
No, he was there - I saw him! He spoke to me. Something about some lawyer who fucks sheep.
I just want it firmly in your minds when they cut to them during the speech, that's all.
I've never told anyone else, but they did Thomas with a broken Coke bottle.
Did he at least get to drink a bottle of tequila first?
I've seen Scalia say on more than one occasion that he decided long ago not to attend, because it's a waste of time. In his words, the justices are "forced to sit there like a bump on a log," and he doesn't see any point in it. There's no provision in the Constitution for it. And more recently, I saw him say that the whole thing with Alito last time is exactly why he doesn't go.
Is that Paula Poundstone there also?
No, that's Alito.
I hear Keith Olbermann is going.
He is after all going to run for Senate.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo.....or-senate-
LOL
How disappointing.
Supposedly, the chatter in Washington was that refusing to show up would be disrespectful to the federal judge who caught a bullet in Tucson.
Truly, our political class is vile, using a dead man to leverage Justices into making a political show like this.
I'd show up, but wearing a kimono.
I'd wear a Hawaiin shirt, a jock strap, and a hard hat. No reason, just for kicks.
Boxers and bunny slippers. With some retro steampunk goggles on my head for flare.
Leather chaps with no pants.
"Fuck the Establishment" t-shirt, ripped jeans, and a fauxhawk.
So, like Brian Wilson.
pitcher, not singer
Oh, come now, RC. Our political class does a lot more vile stuff than this.
You mean like killing hookers while on a PCP bender?
Politics is entertainment for really, really ugly people.
Yeah, and the whole Tucson tragedy is going to make this absurd farce even more absurd and nauseating than it usually is.
The State of the Union is utter BS, no matter who gives the speech.
I look forward to this campaign speech.
Now they can just use "THE STORM, OF THE CENTURY"? as an excuse for not showing up. It was good enough to close down my university's night classes.
I'll probably watch and then wonder why the hell I bothered, just like every year.
I must say that I admired Alito's restraint last year. I would have had a hard time not shouting or storming out when the president lied.
I would like to be in sunny Hawaii, giving a lecture in the state bar.