Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

The Future is About to Get a Little Darker for California as 100-Watt Light Bulb Ban Kicks in

Nick Gillespie | 12.27.2010 9:47 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Come January 1, 2011, California will begin phasing out the legal sale and purchase of 100-watt incandescent light bulbs.

Due to federal legislation proudly signed by George W. Bush in 2007, the rest of the country will face the same issue starting in 2012, as per the Energy Independence and Security Act, which phases out the use of traditional light bulbs between 40 watts and 150 watts over a two-year period.

The Golden State is starting a year early to comply with its own energy-reduction mandates.

Reason's Katherine Mangu-Ward wrote about the coming ban back in 2007 and here's a Reason.tv video on why "compact fluorescent lightbulbs" (CFLs), the favored replacement for Thomas Edison's most iconic invention are not all that.

Hat tip: ginthegin's Twitter feed.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Frank Rich's Selective Nostalgianomics for Disneyland

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PolicyCultureEnergy & EnvironmentReason.tvEnvironmentalism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (60)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Opportunistic Nanny   15 years ago

    Of course, the fact that the compact incandescents have mercury in them will just give us an excuse to take control of what you are allowed to put in the garbage.

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      Or an excuse to dig through your trash. On the upside, that's a lot of jobs created/saved.

      1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

        And while they're digging through your trash, might as well do some more snooping, because only an Eric Rudolph wanna-be would use incandescent bulbs.

        1. wylie   15 years ago

          I saw that girl in the 1st Nightmare on Elm Street use lightbulbs as weapons, so.....TERRORISM!!!!111oneoneone!

          1. Janet Napolitano   15 years ago

            The TSA should be alerted that you watched that movie and came to that conclusion, wylie.

            1. wylie   15 years ago

              Alerted to my kickass antiterrorism skillz, right?

              1. DHS   15 years ago

                The SPLC told us to look out for libertarian-minded people, and they're NEVER wrong.

                Obviously, you are all the next Timothy McVeigh, and we will treat you accordingly.

  2. Fluffy   15 years ago

    The CFL's in my house do not work properly when the thermostat is set below 62 degrees. They fail to reach their full illumination.

    So if they make me buy all CFL's, I'm just going to use more fuel oil.

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      Or....

      Just buy 4x as many 25watt incandescents to get to the same brightness level, thereby using more glass and metal (which require energy to refine.) Oh, more packaging too.

      All around, it's a big win for the environment.

    2. GroundTruth   15 years ago

      D'oh!

      Too bad the politicians and greenies forgot about this 'inconvenient truth' when they damned us to darkness.

      1. Eric Eldred   15 years ago

        You are a dumb ass

  3. Zeng Peets   15 years ago

    LOL, only in California, thats just too funny dude.

    http://www.online-privacy.ie.tc

    1. Hugh Akston   15 years ago

      Unfortunately, anon-bot, where California goes, so goes the nation.

      1. Banana   15 years ago

        Myth.

  4. Lost_In_Translation   15 years ago

    I've been pleased with the operation of some of my CFL's, but their tendency to flicker is annoying me greatly.

    1. Mr Whipple   15 years ago

      I've found that not all CFLs are created equal.

      1. Almanian   15 years ago

        Wattist!

    2. Suki   15 years ago

      Try one in an Easy-Bake Oven and see how much more you hate it. California is being sexist against girls with this ban, forcing young women to cross state lines to smuggle 100w bulbs in for their ovens.

  5. .   15 years ago

    "compact fluorescent lightbulbs" (CFLs), the favored replacement for Thomas Edison's most iconic invention are not all that.

    I was thinking politicians's heads stuck on the ends of pikes, dipped in oil, and lit might make good replacements.

    1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

      Just the heads? That's wasteful!

    2. Jahblonski   15 years ago

      Isn't adding extra oil to any part of a politician sort of redundant?

  6. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Just the heads? That's wasteful!

    Nonsense; you keep the head, and send the remainder to the rendering plant, to be made into carbon neutral organic fuel oil.

    Win!

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      Precisely. You don't want the bowels loosing up on the pike, really ruins the Luau atmosphere.

      1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

        I was thinking the headless bodies could be fed to pigs, thereby increasing the bacon supply our country desperately needs.

        1. wylie   15 years ago

          Slow down. You're getting close to having ME support a taboo against pork.

          Eating scraps and feces is fine, but feeding them politicians? Talk about an unclean source of food.

          1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

            Good point.

          2. Billy Shakespeare   15 years ago

            Eating scraps and feces is fine, but feeding them politicians? Talk about an unclean source of food.

            The ground-up brains in particular could be dangerous, possibly resulting in an epidemic of "Mad-CongressCritter" disease.

            1. wylie   15 years ago

              an epidemic of "Mad-CongressCritter" disease.

              So we all get to vote for our own pay-increases, what's the problem?

    2. Ted S.   15 years ago

      Charlton Heston: Soylent Green is people!

      Police Chief: Actually, Soylent Green is politicians, so we're OK.

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        If I'm not going to eat pork that was fed politicians, I'm not sure how you're going to convince me to eat the politicians straight-up.

  7. Leigh   15 years ago

    Now how the hell can I power my easy bake oven?

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      Jeez, next your going to tell us you use wood for cooking fuel. Why do you hate Gaia?

      1. Brett L   15 years ago

        She's a cold bitch.

    2. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

      I'd best stock up on bulbs for my lava-lamp collection...

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        Oh SHIT!

        "Only druggies use incandescants."

        Should work like gangbusters.

        1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

          You know who else used incandescents...

          1. wylie   15 years ago

            Except Goebbles had limited success with the Easy Bake Oven: Holocaust Edition.

            1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

              That would take a long time. Economies of scale and whatnot.

    3. DavidinOC   15 years ago

      Don't use a 75W bulb in an EZ Bake unless you plan to have your daughter eat the cake with a spoon! Recent experience!

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        *insert disappointed anecdote from user who misunderstood the "Same Performance as 100W Incandescent" labeling on his 45W CFL.*

        1. wylie   15 years ago

          excerpt from that Customer Review:

          "...and the bulb wouldn't even fit, I had to smash it up a little bit to get it in the oven."

  8. wylie   15 years ago

    On the subject of Easy-Bake Ovens:

    Hasbro started putting heating elements in them in 2006. Someone read the winds-of-change well that day.

    1. Leigh   15 years ago

      http://www.amazon.com/Easy-Bak.....B001DI4VN0

      Here it still requires the 100 watt bulb.

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        The "Easy Bake Oven" model with the element was apparently discontinued and recalled pretty fast. So much for their prescient business sense.

        Though, there's also the "Easy Bake Real Meal Oven", which has run off an element since it was released in 2003. Apparently also discontinued since then.

        Poor Hasbro, light bulbs are dangerous to the environment (*chortle*) but other heat sources are too dangerous to children (*more laughter*, fucking noobs).

        1. wylie   15 years ago

          Oh, and thx Leigh, for making me do research on the Easy Bake Oven to clarify the incomplete information I got from wikipedia.

  9. CrackertyAssCracker   15 years ago

    I sense a market opportunity for foor to door sales of 151 watt light bulbs.

    1. CrackertyAssCracker   15 years ago

      door to door

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        Four to the Floor, Door to Door, 151Watt Bulbs And 151 Proof Rum.

        Wylie's Kickass Delivery Service
        800-555-5555

    2. wylie   15 years ago

      actually, on a serious note, this might really be a market opportunity for glass blowers. From one illicit product to another.

  10. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Just wait 'til the Mexican counterfeit light bulb cartel start shooting up the aisles at Home Depot.

  11. Some other guy   15 years ago

    Presenting... Heatball!
    The most original invention since the electric light bulb! Although a heatball is technically very similar to a light bulb, it is a heater rather than a source of light.

    Heatballs fit into commonly found E27 and E14 sockets. Its efficiency [more...] is unprecedented.

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      Its efficiency [more...] is unprecedented.

      Yeah, no precedent like that has been set since the 1st time someone ran current through a nichrome wire. Nobody tell Sunbeam (or whoever makes your toaster).

    2. Slut Bunwalla   15 years ago

      I can't quite tell exactly how much sarcasm is being used on that site. Is the Heatball just an incandescent light bulb?

  12. Oso Politico   15 years ago

    Great opportunity for the Kennedy Clan, which apparently is running out of juice: 200 proof light bulbs...

  13. Handsome Dan   15 years ago

    Meh.

  14. nico   15 years ago

    why would anyone still run incandescent? if you're concerned about mercury go buy led bulbs instead, they last 50 times longer than compact fluorescents without any of the "negative" side effects.

    the government comes up with stuff like this for the public good. how is this a "bad" thing again? gee, smoking kills, trans fat kills, and using less energy is a good thing.

    wah! wah! nanny state! nanny state!

  15. danny orlando   15 years ago

    - Most fully warm up in seconds
    - the light is the same color temperature as an incandescent and has only 15% less color rendering
    - more mercury pollutes the environment from burning coal to power 100-yr old technology than throwing away a CFL
    -Lifetime...I still have CFLs in my house that I date with a sharpie when I installed them - One is still dated 2003 and works fine.
    - under $2.00 a lamp is what you call costing nearly 10x as much - what are you drinking
    - Dimmable CFL's have been available for YEARS
    - There is no interference issues, CFL's operate at over 20kHz

    Try to 'reason' with these FACTS, bozo

  16. DOUG   15 years ago

    Has anyone heard of Thorium? Carlos Rubbia came up with the ADS Thorium nuclear reactor, which is sub-critical, spelled "SAFE"...no nuclear waste to speak of and abundant safe fuel...

  17. Eric Eldred   15 years ago

    There were many claims in this opinion piece that either were false or were also true for incandescent bulb, like the bulb's life is diminished if it is turned on and off more frequently. The claims don't add because they lack substnace. At some point these guys need to stop using the freedom argument to continue being wasteful and stupid. There has to be a point where the really stupid stuff, especially the stuff that impacts the rest of us when enough idiots do it, gets banned for the sake of the greater good. It's part of growing up.

  18. lighthouse   14 years ago

    Creativity should be celebrated, not Destruction.

    Celebrating creativity is about recognizing the advantages that different products have.
    That is why they exist for people to choose.
    And it includes ordinary incandescent light bulbs compared to Halogens, CFLs, LEDs?.

    President Obama, State of the Union Address 25 January 2011:
    What we can do - what America does better than anyone - is spark the creativity and imagination of our people.
    We are the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices,
    the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers..

    Yes Mr President, Creative America, the nation of Edison:
    Would you not have allowed him to create his popular light bulb?

    And so it came to pass, in the autumn of 1879, after tireless effort working with different materials, Thomas Edison finally arrived at the ingenious invention we still see today, the Edison light bulb, the world's single most popular electrical appliance and the oldest electrical invention in widespread common use:
    A beautifully simple, safe, cheap, bright light delivering construction.

    Maybe the time will come when, like its cousin the gleaming radio tube, it gradually fades away, the passing of old technology.

    But let it be a democratic passing by the will of the people,
    not a passing by committee dictats and decrees.

    How many American, European or other officials should it take to change a light bulb?
    None.
    How many citizens should be allowed to choose?
    Everyone.

    http://ceolas.net compares free markets, taxation and regulation on light bulbs
    .

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's 'Giant Win' Does Not Validate His Unconstitutional Birthright Citizenship Order

Jacob Sullum | 7.2.2025 12:01 AM

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Medicaid Work Requirements Are a Short-Term Fix to a Long-Term Problem

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 4:18 PM

The U.S. Is Closing Every Door on Afghan Allies

Beth Bailey | 7.1.2025 4:00 PM

Trump's Travel Ban Will Not Make Americans Safer

Benjamin Powell | 7.1.2025 3:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!