"Sure, video games let us shoot at Fidel Castro…but where's the game that attacks our favorite conservative Supreme Court Justices?"
Via the great legal blog How Appealing, here's the story of what video game site Kotaku dubs possibly "the year's most liberal video game," Assassin's Creed Brotherhood:
The backdrop for the games adventures is that many of history's greatest conflicts and most notorious assassinations were the product of a longtime war between the player's side, the brotherhood of Assassins and the enemy, the Templars, those former Knights who are, in the game's modern times (2012! End of the world!), an evil corporation….
Many hours into Assassin's Creed Brotherhood, the game reveals how the U.S. Supreme Court fits into this. Specifically the game establishes that the early 2010 version of the Court led by Chief Justice John Roberts that decided the Citizens United case early this year — a decision notoriously condemned by President Obama during his State of The Union address — was in cahoots with the Templars. Roberts, I guess, is in with the bad guys.
Read the whole thing here. Jacob Sullum discusses the reaction to Citizens United here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nonsense. The Supreme Court had Illuminati written all over it.
I've heard you can play Team Palin vs. Team Obama in NBA Jam. If his skill levels are set higher than hers, it's "the year's most liberal video game." Dude's a bricklayer.
R U f'n serious.
I was considering starting to play the Assassins franchise (I saw a cheap copy of the first at game stop)
F it - I keep blastin' Zombies as John Marston. Or COD MW2 - cause black ops is for fags...
cause black ops is for fags...
What's the matter? Having a little problem prestiging?
No really haven't played it (black ops) I do like starting wars with friends of mine who will argue whether Galo: Reacharound is better than MW2 - So my new one is to hate on Black ops and see who I can get mad - 😉
BlackOps > Halo > MW2
In case you wanted a seasoned FPS player's opinion.
BO kicks the shit out of MW2.
What the fuck is up with the beards?
I have the funny feeling the real black ops guys generally grow less biker beards then video game makers.
Or wait am i thinking about a different game.
All those contemporary military third person shooters just seem to melt together.
first person shooters
third person, as in "shoot every third person"...
third person, as in "shoot every third person"...
I think a third person shooter would be something like Tomb raider. Basically you can see the avatar you are playing from behind or over the shoulder. Of course they have better names for those type of games, like platformer.
but yeah I meant to write first person shooter.
They do have third person over-the-shoulder shooters, though. Gears of War, Mass Effect, that sort of thing.
When the hell did "prestige" become a verb?
Today...right here! 🙂
I played the first one and while the setting was interesting, the gameplay was extraordinarily repetitive. Every single mission is exactly the same: walk up to a guy, press a mouse button, run away.
Maybe they fixed this in later versions, but I wasn't enticed to try them.
Am I the only one who pines for the days when a game didn't need a story? If I want a story, I'll read a book. "Space Invaders," "Doom," "Angband," those classics didn't have or need a story beyond, "Gotta fight those guys."
Thanks, grandpa. We younguns will stay off your lawn...
Those games still exist. They're just smartphone downloads or website games now.
angband?
Oh come on, it has 5 novels. Plus any unfinished works.
Heck, I love games with stories, but even they're getting so extreme it's pissing me off. It's more a case of adding unnecessary story to everything.
Case in point: Final Fantasy XIII. If you want to know how interesting the game is, here's the map for the first 6 hours or so (at the bottom they point out Vanille's line, loosely "The way forward is really obvious, huh?"). They somehow managed to quadruple the amount of story in an amazingly story-heavy franchise (by having several minute-long cutscenes at every juncture), while taking out every single instance of non-linearity.
I do wish games starting taking themselves a bit less seriously.
No, but then, I only play Go and Scrabble online.
AC II is far better than the first one. Much deeper gameplay and varying mission structure. AC was fun, but you're right - totally repetitive. AC II added a lot of new mechanics and mission types to the game, enough to make the gameplay fresh and enjoyable for the duration of your playthrough.
Haven't picked up AC:B, and with FONV and BlackOps, am not going to have the time for it for a while.
relax the game is made by the French.
They do not know shit about citizens untied and i am sure the game makers simply chose the Supreme Court and Roberts because they represent big government.
The plot of assassins creed is generally anti-tyranny and economically libertine if not libertarian.
One should note the sentence:
Specifically the game establishes that the early 2010 version of the Court led by Chief Justice John Roberts that decided the Citizens United case early this year ? a decision notoriously condemned by President Obama during his State of The Union address ? was in cahoots with the Templars. Roberts, I guess, is in with the bad guys.
Does not say the game has the player go after Roberts because of Citizens United...and it is my guess the game does not even reference the case.
Opps...after watching the video with the articles link it owuld seem the game very much referances Citizens Untied.
In the video there is also a thing on GW bush.
I wouldn't trust anything made by the French...
Assassin's Creed is the most overrated game series. The first game sucked and the history in it sounded like it was written by an eighth grader who grew up in Fidel Castro's house.
I liked Assassin's Creed 1, and really liked Assassin's Creed 2, even though I generally suck at platforming (of which there is a fair amount in the games).
Good visuals, good gameplay, entertaining story. I still have my copy of AC2, and its on my "probably replay" list.
Although Borderlands is already on my "definitely replay" list, and I'm only partway through. I'm jacked up with incendiary weapons, and gettin' ready to go after Dr. Ned.
Borderlands is a damn brilliant game.
With the caveat that I don't know how the player v. Roberts court dynamic plays out in the game, shouldn't we be considering it a Good Thing for a game to portray a branch of government as an authority worthy of skepticism? Also, you know, all that "it's a video game" stuff we (rightly) trot out when someone insists a game with guns in it will necessarily turn all children into serial killers?
I think the worry here is not that kids will become little Dexters...the worry is the game will turn adults into libertarian hating left wing nut jobs.
If anything the game puts almost all political authority on the evil side of the Templars.
I don't know. It's a fun game (I *heart* platforming games), but storyline wise, it comes off as a leftist vanguard fantasy.
On the one side, we have the evil, authoritarian, technocratic, mind-controlling Templars. They are apparently behind the Crusades, the Catholic Church, the American Revolution, World War II, and killed JFK to stop him from finding a magic MacGuffin on the moon. Oh yeah, and they're like...totally corporate and evil and junk.
On the other side, we have the Assassins who claim to possess the One True Way, but for some reason don't want to share it with the great unwashed. By virtue of possessing the One True Way, it gives them a moral privilege and duty to kill Templar evil-doers without warning "for the greater good." Oh, and did we forget to mention that all that religion stuff is superstitious nonsense because it's really just sufficiently advanced alien technology? Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed, Vishnu, Minerva: all aliens or people with alien-tech.
Like any video game, the more you read into it for philosophical or moral instruction, the less likely you are to enjoy it.
I like the Assassin's Creed series. I bring to it my own bias, of course, but the Assassin's Creed seems pretty clear to me. If anyone is out excercising any power or authority to tyranical ends, the Assassins go kill them. And in even in the first game, spoilor alert, the Assasins will kill their own members if they start using their assasin skills to manipulate and opress people. So its no surprise that the supreme court would be a target, the assassin's creed should put them square up against every gov't on the planet, or at least up against particular individuals in each gov't across the planet. The only way to protect yourself from the assasin's would be to follow a personal ethos of peace and free trade. The Assassin's seem to be funded by engaging in mutually beneficial exchange, in the 2nd game, the main character invests in fixing up his real estate property, opening a bank, stores, restoring a mine, wells, making his Villa an attractive place for travellers to visit and then charging rent to tenants. Another Assassin helper in the game runs a brothel. To me the Assassin's rely wholly on commerce for their living, though you can totally pickpocket anyone in the streets if you like, and you consort often with theives and thugs.
I haven't yet played the new one, so my opinion could change.
I have not played the game but from reading about it and watching stuff on G4 it is my understanding that many of the side missions the players goes around and stops the House of Borgia from extorting money from local business of Rome in 1499. As you go around righting wrongs of the corrupt ruling class the city will change from being derelict to one with new paint jobs and repairs to buildings and more poeple bustling around doing their business.
Yes, that's true. If you liked AC2, you'll love Brotherhood. It's got even more side missions which helps to change the pace of the game and keep things entertaining even at the beginning.
Specifically the game establishes that the early 2010 version of the Court led by Chief Justice John Roberts that decided the Citizens United case early this year ? a decision notoriously condemned by President Obama during his State of The Union address ? was in cahoots with the Templars. Roberts, I guess, is in with the bad guys.
One should note that Assassins Creed is made by Ubisoft....
A Video game company based in France.
Black Ops which lets you take a shot at Castro is mady by Activision which are owned by a French company.
Activision which are owned by a French company.
You mean Finnish not French.
also should note that the actual Black Ops development team, Treyarch, that made the game are American.
The Development team for assassins creed were Frogs.
You mean Finnish not French.
Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia. Vivendi is very much a French company.
The Development team for assassins creed were Frogs.
Frogs but not French. They're Canadian frogs.
holy shit?!?!?
The studio was opened in 1997, with government funding.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubisoft_Montreal
Reason should review Minecraft.
In the game you are the only person in a vast randomly generated world rich in resources that you exploit for your own enjoyment.
Minecraft also has one of the best representations of government in any game.
http://i.imgur.com/MPQk9.gif?dateline=1283292999
after watching this you will never be able to sleep again!!!
I'll probably play it eventually...1 was meh but 2 was fantastic. At the moment, however, I am still caught up in exploring the mojave wasteland.
I can't get away from the Mojave myself.
Beat it last night, checked the total playtime. Over 100 hours. Wow.
Lives, you all need to get some part of your lives that do not involve video...
DOES NOT COMPUTE
Yes, the Assassin's Creed series is obnoxiously liberal. It's also fantastically fun (though I am a stealth gamer through and through; YMMV, and all that).
Seriously, if you can't enjoy a bit entertainment despite it's stupidly liberal bias, there just aren't a lot of options out there for you.
So, does Black Ops have the same blase forgettable and short campaign of MW2? Does it's multiplayer suck like MW and MW2? Damn the MW series is so overrated.
And the problem is exactly what? Right wing websites do exactly the same thing, just substituting President Obama. What's sauce for the goose is sause for the gander.