Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Something to Tide You Over Until Reason's Restory Sanity Coverage Is Up

Tim Cavanaugh | 10.30.2010 5:49 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Jon Stewart blames the 24-hour conflictinator's existence for making something harder:

Global AIDS hecklers get President off message:

As promised, Something to Tide You Over:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reasoners on the Tube: Nick Gillespie Will Be on Freedom Watch Today at 10AM & 8PM ET

Tim Cavanaugh
CultureTelevision
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (62)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Max   15 years ago

    Wow, two intelligent speakers in a single Hit and Run post. Do you think donations will come in the shore up the site's stupidity?

    1. ryback's cook   15 years ago

      (Sic)

    2. Tim Cavanaugh   15 years ago

      Total dittos, Max. Danson and Nielsen both have never been better.

    3. Hey Max Girl   15 years ago

      You are on some weird, propaganda group's payroll. Huffington Post?

    4. prolefeed   15 years ago

      Wow, two intelligent speakers in a single Hit and Run post. Do you think donations will come in the shore up the site's stupidity?

      If you count your donation to the commentary on this thread, Max, then yes, they already have come in and shored up Teh Stoopid.

      1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

        I don't think HuffPo is a) stupid and b) desperate enough to pay Max to be a leftist fluffer.

        His mom, OTOH, does pay him to post here, but only indirectly... as in room-and-board and internet access. And getting the jizz stains out of his Underoos.

  2. MCab   15 years ago

    Jon Stewart's approach is like someone saying "I don't mean to be offensive, but fuck you."

    Good on Obams for shutting those people up. Then they show how classy they are by booing him. I wonder if they would be shocked to realize how much Bush funded for treating HIV in Africa.

    1. Tulpa   15 years ago

      Judging by his response to the hecklers, that they should go protest "the folks who aren't interested in funding Global AIDS", apparently Obama would be shocked to realize that fact as well.

      Or, maybe he was just lying.

    2. alan   15 years ago

      How much is Bush worth? Four to ten million range? What has put into AIDS funding out of that net worth, ten, twenty thousand. Well, hats off to him, then.

      1. Wha'?   15 years ago

        Bush's personal net worth is much more than that. Bush poured tens of billions of U.S. dollars into Africa for AIDS relief. Where all that money ended up is another question -- I hope a good portion was helpful. Ironically, Obama praised him for it back then which is another reason that Obama sucks now: hypocrisy.

    3. Jerry   15 years ago

      Not a single condom however.

      1. MCab   15 years ago

        Sadly indeed.

      2. Michael Ejercito   15 years ago

        Not a single condom however.

        People in Africa can not afford condoms?

    4. Jim Treacher   15 years ago

      Jon Stewart's approach is like someone saying "I don't mean to be offensive, but fuck you."

      Yep.

      http://www.indecisionforever.c.....h-everyone

    5. Vermont Gun Owner   15 years ago

      He lost me on calling them "Young people". When did he get so old and crotchety that his senility made him forget how much support he got from college kids?

  3. JW   15 years ago

    OK, Stewart's bit didn't suck.

    What did I miss? Becuase I have a hard time believing that the rest of it wasn't the usual Daily Show bushitlerglibsmugfest.

  4. Johnitalia   15 years ago

    Its weird that Obama has been funding Global Aids. You would think he would fund research for a cure instead of giving funding to the actual disease.

    1. flye   15 years ago

      I felt the same way about sexual harassment training at work. But what the heck, I'll try anything once.

      1. What you signed there was...   15 years ago

        a Sexual Harassment Consent Form.

      2. MCab   15 years ago

        They show that training video that was on Family Guy.

  5. J   15 years ago

    Jesus, I had misgivings about Obama before he was elected, but I genuinely didn't think his speeches would be comprised of petulantly blaming anyone and everyone for his problems. He had a majority in the House, a super-majority in the Senate, and ran into problems after problem. But, it's all the GOP's fault, not his lack of leadership ability.

    1. They wanted Socialism....   15 years ago

      Looks like somebody's party is in open revolt. Obama-style progressive politics isn't playing out well. That's all he knows -- he's not smart enough to change. Well, maybe he can find a few more billionaires to bail out to appeal to his "base".

      1. J   15 years ago

        Some are in revolt. However, after he pressured the judge who overturned Don't Ask, Don't Tell to change his mind, I didn't hear any of his base complain. This makes me think they only object to people Republican first, not opposing gay rights.

        1. Exactly   15 years ago

          Case in point: Pakistan -- not a whimper from his base for his "necessary" war. At the most extreme of his base are the "LBJ Hey Hey who'd you kill today" bunch. Well, they got the old Dems out, but look what they turned into themselves. Pitiful, and we're all paying now.

          1. J   15 years ago

            Or when Holder said he would continue to send his DEA thugs to California even if Prop 19 passed. I've hardly heard even a whimper from the left.

  6. rac   15 years ago

    Was the Rally for Sanity predominantly white?

    1. SIV   15 years ago

      "Overwhelmingly white"

      1. Shen Lao   15 years ago

        Why do you white people forbid us from participating in your festivals? We bake homemade apple pies and assemble American flags in our factories, and this is how you repay us?

        Tell your buffoonish comedians that they're not funny. They're also not very good looking.

    2. I don't know   15 years ago

      This non-participant didn't attend, so I couldn't say. I don't think I'll watch the re-runs either. Football, basketball, and the World Series, ya know.

    3. Rally for Sanity   15 years ago

      With a name like that, who in their right mind would attend anyway?

      1. Supposed to be a joke   15 years ago

        Oh, Ha Ha.

    4. Anomalous   15 years ago

      I was there. It was whiter than the NHL.

      1. Sarcasmo 2000?   15 years ago

        I'm thinking black folks don't watch the Daily Show and think Colbert is a kind of cheese, which isn't entirely wrong.

    5. Jim Treacher   15 years ago

      Of course the crowd was predominantly white. It's satire, dummy!

  7. Tulpa   15 years ago

    It's easy to call for calm and toning down nasty rhetoric when your party runs everything. Funny that Stewart wasn't calling for political calm back in 2006 and 2008.

    Notice that these guys are calling for scaling back the "Tea Party = racism" meme on the left only after it has totally backfired on them. Back in June they weren't so interested in scaling it back.

    1. PapayaSF   15 years ago

      Back in June they were building it up.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   15 years ago

    Stewart is approaching Bill Maher territory. The 24-hour conflictinator only has room for one smug, self-important comedian-turned-pundit.

    1. Tulpa   15 years ago

      Things were so much easier back when we didn't have this 24-hour partisan cable news mess, when everybody could just turn on Walter Cronkite at 6 o'clock and trust that he was telling the truth.

  9. rac   15 years ago

    OK, I just went on line and saw images of the Rally to Restore Sanity, and it was glad to see it was not predominantly white It was OVERWHELMINGLY white. Being non-white, I am glad I did not venture near this clearly racist gathering.

  10. waffles   15 years ago

    haters gonna hate. I streamed the rally and thought it was thoroughly agreeable, not over-the-top, and mostly on point. For many of you, derision is your first response to Stewart, but I can't share the animus.

    If anything, this rally might help excite some Californians into passing prop 19. At least I hope so.

    1. Tulpa   15 years ago

      If they had done this rally back in March, I would agree with you. But at this point in time, it reeks of narrative control in view of inevitable crushing defeat.

      After the election, Stewart can claim that he tried to play nice with the GOP/tea party and look where it got him.

      1. MNG   15 years ago

        That's goofy. Steward doesn't have to "play" with anyone, he's a tv personality. His job is making fun of people, usually conservatives.

        1. Tulpa   15 years ago

          Stewart has positioned himself as a political pundit, however much he tries to hide behind his "comedian" shield when people call him on his bullshit.

          He also plays mighty nice with Democrats on his show (aka Obama last week).

          1. Libertarian Jerk   15 years ago

            He wants so hard to be taken seriously but when he actually is serious and is criticized for his opinions, he puts on the clown face again.

      2. CommentArrrr   15 years ago

        "If they had done this rally back in March, I would agree with you."

        I'm pretty sure Viacom doesn't have the money to just send them all down to D.C. for a day at a whim. They shot everything down in DC for a week, which means this was the convenient time for said rally.

        Sure it would've been nice to do it sooner, but Comedy Central isn't exactly rolling in the dough to do an event like this whenever it pleases. They've got to do it when the timing actually works out properly.

    2. bullhorn legthorn   15 years ago

      Prop 19 - THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE OF THE ELECTION.

      NO DOOBIES, NO PEACE!

  11. XM   15 years ago

    "restory sanity coverage"

    Don't you guys mean "restore sanity"?

  12. troy   15 years ago

    I think one of the rules for the rally was don't be a douchebag.

    And god was Nick a douchebag. Oh wow, you managed to find some idiots out of tens of thousands of people. Whoa! Color me impressed.

    And about noting about all the white people. Well Gee Nick, what was the fucking quota of black people that were supposed to be there to satisfy your opinion of multiculturalism or whatever the point you were trying to make? So if white people make up about 75% of the population (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American) and the rally is representative of the nation as a whole, doesn't it stand to reason that most of them would be white? Like fucking OVERWHELMINGLY white?

    One of the points of the rally was to get past all the histrionics. The cheap potshots showed that Reason TV is no better the O Reilly or Maddow.

    1. MNG   15 years ago

      Er, Nick pointed that out because it was so relentlessly noted about the Tea Party rallies.

      Good for the goose, good for gander.

    2. prolefeed   15 years ago

      The question is, what was the percentage of people interviewed who were anywhere near as idiotic as some of these 'tards caught on camera? 1%? 10%? 50%? more?

      I'm pretty sure they didn't interview tens of thousands of people.

      I've been to a Tea Party rally on April 15th, and I didn't talk to anyone there who seemed to be stupid or crazy, politicians excluded.

    3. Tulpa   15 years ago

      One of the points of the rally was to get past all the histrionics.

      Yes, now that the lefty media's histrionics over the past six months have utterly failed, they appeal to stop the histrionics.

      Why wasn't Stewart appealing for calm back in 2006 and 2008 when faced with all the Bush haters?

    4. sage   15 years ago

      Yeah, I can't imagine it's difficult to find a pile of stupid at one of these things. No different that talking to a bunch of union people on strike. Fuck them.

    5. Libertarian Jerk   15 years ago

      Well, the left seemed to have a quota for the Tea Party and the Beck rally.

      I only think it's fair to apply it both sides, you know, restoring sanity.

  13. Apogee   15 years ago

    Actually, it will be interesting to see the increase in histrionics on the left after the beating next week.

    You would think that someone would have coordinated future DNC strategies with an eye to the hyperbole that inevitably will follow from the Dems losing control of congress. I find it hard to believe that this marks the end of the paper mache and melodrama from the left.

    Why make a big show about reasonableness when your team is about to lurch into un-reasonable territory?

    Is the Dem party at war with itself?

  14. heller   15 years ago

    When is Stewart going to get some new material? I distinctly remember him making this exact same rant on Crossfire in 2004. It didn't make much sense then, it doesn't make much sense now.

    1. John Thacker   15 years ago

      As long as he has competition in the sometimes serious sometimes satirical sometimes only joking entertainer space. On Crossfire he was attacking a competitor. He's rather like Rush Limbaugh.

    2. hmm   15 years ago

      When the lemmings stop stomping and clapping at his old material?

    3. Tulpa   15 years ago

      Sesame Street hasn't really changed much since the 70s either.

  15. Jen Wilson   15 years ago

    Wow, this actually makes a lot of sense dude. Never thought about it that way.

    http://www.anonymize.it.tc

  16. mattrue   15 years ago

    All I hear is "there's too much speech... no one can hear me and my great ideas"

    What a whiny little bitch.

    1. Vermont Gun Owner   15 years ago

      I thought the part before Obama started getting booed sounded very whiny too.

      "I really thought that everyone would put politics aside, and just pass my political agenda. But despite overwhelming majorities in Congress, people still wouldn't agree that my plan is the non-partisan option and just shut up and do it."

  17. joshua corning   15 years ago

    liberal haters: Spend money on what we want you to spend money on

    Obama: Shut up, it is my money i am printing i will spend it how i want

    liberal haters: BOOOOOOO

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

They Fled Socialism and Came to the U.S. Legally. Now the Trump Administration Is Trying To Deport Them.

Billy Binion | 8.8.2025 5:19 PM

A Terrible Environmental Law Finally Did Something Good: It Paused Construction of Alligator Alcatraz

Autumn Billings | 8.8.2025 4:28 PM

From Terror Sanctions to Military Strikes? Trump's Cartel Policy Sidesteps Congress

Matthew Petti | 8.8.2025 2:15 PM

Trump's Tariffs May Soon Make Car Insurance More Expensive

Joe Lancaster | 8.8.2025 1:20 PM

The FBI Has No Business Tracking Down Texas Democrats

Tosin Akintola | 8.8.2025 12:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!