First Amendment-Trampling Judge Faces Last Minute Effort To Unseat Her
In August I posted about Felicia Gibson, a North Carolina woman who was arrested and later convicted of "resisting, delaying or obstructing an officer." Gibson's transgression? She recorded a traffic stop on her street. She was on her own porch at the time. A number of people were viewing the stop, but only Gibson was recording it, and only Gibson was arrested.
Gibson was convicted by Rowan County District Court Juge Beth Dixon. Dixon is up for reelection next week, and photography activist Carlos Miller is launching a last-minute Facebook campaign targeted at users in her county.
It's been almost two months since North Carolina judge Beth Dixon was forced to remove her Facebook campaign page after an onslaught of criticism from people who did not appreciate the way she trampled on the First Amendment.
Now with just over a week to go before the Rowan County District Court election, the two-term incumbent is hoping that local voters will not allow such petty meeatmories to vote her out of office.
After all, since that controversial ruling in late August, the local media has virtually ignored this election.
However, I've just relaunched a Facebook ad campaign targeting voters in her area in the hopes that they will vote against her on November 2.
Miller's Facebook page making the case against Dixon is here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Meeatmories"?
http://www.terrybisson.com/page6/page6.htm
Working link
Excuse my ill-posting above. "Most profound thing you ever said! HURR DURR!"
Only SugarFree can screw up posting a link this badly.
I want to hear more about these "meatmovies."
Yeah - i even dictionary.comed "meeatmories" to no avail.
Me Eat Mories, which is obviously a nickname for Morels. Philistines.
Meeatmories. It's a Barbara Streisand song.
Meat memories...
I remember the first time I fucked a pork chop. Her name was Jennifer and I made love to her until the wee hours of a chilly Sunday morning. She was bone-in, of course. I was no pervert, there was nothing immoral about our love, no matter how the patrician harpies looked down their beaks at us. Our love was pure and without a trace of gristle. I fried Jennifer in a shallow pan of olive oil and dressed her with capers and admiration. And then I ate her. And then I fucked the skillet.
Sick bastard. Everybody knows garlic is better than capers.
My third wife insisted on capers. She was a total bitch.
Wow, Google really keeps close watch over H&R: your comment is currently the #1 search result for that word.
I was wondering about this this morning. Are my comments so vanilla that people just skip over them, then respond enthusiastically to basically the same post downthread?
It's all just a popularity contest.
Yes, I only read the most recent comment of yours because SugarFree had responded to it.
SugarFree's so dreamy
For a pork chop fucker with a capers fetish.
She'll win because a. the people she tramples don't vote, and b. the people who vote are "bullshitsomething-on-crime".
a. the people she tramples don't vote
That would depend on her size, I think. If she were very petite then any trampling she administered might not be any more serious than a light massage, leaving her victims perfectly capable of voting.
Cases like this are why Liberals like the Disclose act.
Huh, someone still uses facebook.
Technically, I'll be committing voter fraud when I vote against Judge Dixon next week.
Technically, Judge Dixon should be tried for treason.
"Me eat mammaries"?
Not as hot a google video search as you might think.
I reserve the right to retract this if she's using an out-of-date photo, but:
I'd hit it.
And record it.
Cutest attorney I personally know from back in the mid nineties when I spent a stint working as a paralegal. Now, she specializes in sex crimes so maybe some of you guys will find this link doubly useful.
http://www.nixonlawoffices.com.....ixon.shtml
High Point? Good to know, since my scofflaw sister lives there.
I would recommend Georgia personally if anyone asked for a good lawyer. She was very professional and smart when I knew her (unlike me).
When she was working in the DA office she tried the most gruesome case I have ever known. A crackhead couple left a hairdryer in a crib to keep the baby warm. Third degree burns over its entire body. I've wondered if that case may have caught the attention of the writers (Boyle involved?) of Trainspotting, but I just have not looked into the matter.
If you are weak of stomach or eating or would prefer extremely gruesome subject matter DO NOT read my 5:08PM post. Sorry, should have ran an alert in that post.
Fluffy, I have little doubt you'd hit a woodchuck, giggling at the scene on the preview from your cell phone cam. . .
Digusting. Anyone who doesn't understand how reflected light rays being absorbed by tiny semiconductor receptors yards away from an arrest interferes with us just doesn't understand law enforcement.
What I don't understand is why even the serious redneck cops wear Victoria Secret lace teddies under their Kevlar.
It said "memories" in the original, unless that had been fixed by the time I got there. Closest I can figure is that Mr. Balko didn't realize where his cursor was when he typed "eat". So now we just have to figure out where "eat" was supposed to go.
Thanks