Police

Illinois ACLU Files Challenge to State Wiretapping Law

|

I've written a couple pieces now about how the Illinois wiretapping law is the toughest in the country, and has been used to charge people who record on-duty police officers with a felony punishable by 4 to 15 years in prison (for each recording). This week, the Illinois ACLU filed a challenge to the law.

The ACLU argues that the act violates the First Amendment and has been used to thwart people who simply want to monitor police activity.

The head of the Chicago police union counters that such recordings could inhibit officers from doing their jobs.

In its lawsuit, the ACLU pointed to six Illinois residents who have faced felony charges after being accused of violating the state's eavesdropping law for recording police making arrests in public venues.

Adrian and Fanon Perteet were passengers in a car at a DeKalb McDonald's drive-through in November when police moved in. Officers suspected that the car's driver was under the influence, according to the brothers.

Fanon Perteet, 23, said he was scared. Past experiences with police had left him suspicious of the officer's motives, he said. So he pulled out his cell phone and turned on the video camera, which also records sound.

"I felt obligated to record so nothing happened," said Perteet, an event planner.

When the officers realized they were being taped, Perteet was arrested and taken to a squad car. Adrian Perteet, 21, a student at Northern Illinois University, then took out his cell phone and started recording his brother's arrest.

Both brothers were charged with violating the eavesdropping act, a felony, their lawyer Bruce Steinberg said. They pleaded guilty in April to attempted eavesdropping, a misdemeanor, to avoid felony convictions, Steinberg said.

The Perteets were ordered to apologize to the officers. They were given back their cell phones, which had been seized by police, but told to delete the recordings…

Mark Donahue, president of the Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, said he believes the state's eavesdropping law is a good one. Allowing people to make audio recordings of arrests "could potentially inhibit an officer from proactively doing his job," Donahue said.

Illinois originally included a provision in its law that for a recording to be illegal, the offended party must have had a reasonable expectation that the recorded conversation was private. Every other state but Massachusetts has a similar provision. But in 1994 the Illinois legislature amended the law to delete that provision, in direct response to a ruling by the Illinois Supreme Court throwing out the conviction of a man who recorded two police officers from the back of their patrol car after he'd been arrested.

In 2006, Illinois State Rep. Chapin Rose (R-Charleston) proposed an amendment to the law explicitly making it legal to record on-duty police, but the amendment died in committee.

It will be interesting to see what the courts say about the constitutionality of the law. But regardless of whether it's permitted by the Constitution, the law is wrongheaded public policy. The Illinois legislature could take care of this tomorrow by passing a bill similar to the one introduced by Rep. Rose.

NEXT: Don't Hate Me Because Working At the DMV Is Beautiful

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Allowing people to make audio recordings of arrests “could potentially inhibit an officer from proactively doing his job,” Donahue said”

    I think he means beating the public for contept of cop, or just for the shear fuck of it.

    1. Oh and first !

      1. Oh how I hate you Mr. 1, though at least mine has a fancy line drawn through for humorous effect.

        1. I submit to your superior HTML tag skills.

          One day I’ll stop being lazy and learn how to do it.

  2. Allowing people to make audio recordings of arrests “could potentially inhibit an officer from proactively doing his job planting evidence and beating the shit out suspects” Donahue said.

    I fixed it for you Mr. Donahue.

  3. Mark Donahue, president of the Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, said he believes the state’s eavesdropping law is a good one.

    What’s worse, cop unions or cop fellators?

    1. Being rogered by a cop who has just been fellated by a legislator and didn’t practice safe sex.

      ;P

  4. Yup, let the bottom feeding attorneys slug it out.

    http://www.privacy-tools.eu.tc

  5. “Mark Donahue, president of the Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, said he believes the state’s eavesdropping law is a good one. Allowing people to make audio recordings of arrests “could potentially inhibit an officer from proactively doing his job,” Donahue said.”

    Anyone else wonder if Mark Donahue is a sheep fucker?

    1. Anyone else wonder if Mark Donahue is a sheep fucker?

      Well, if he isn’t, then he is free to come here and deny it.

      1. We’ll have to wait for SugarFree and his bad-datura-trip-meets-Psycopathia-Sexualis prose to determine the true deviancy of Mr. Donahue.

        1. Nah, he doesn’t do sheep. More of a goat kinda guy.

  6. “”The head of the Chicago police union counters that such recordings could inhibit officers from doing their jobs.””

    If they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear.

    1. The same argument is used in favor of the PATRIOT act. I don’t like it.

      A better line of argument is that public officials exercising the state’s monopoly on violence require a greater degree of scrutiny and additional checks and balances on their behaviour than private citizens. If they are so concerned about manipulated or out of context videos from citizen recordings, they should keep their own recordings to present the full and fair story. The technology exists and is inexpensive, and police abuse of power is a real problem that deserves serious reduction efforts.

      1. “”The same argument is used in favor of the PATRIOT act. I don’t like it.””

        It not a good arguement, no.

        But if that’s what they want to preach, I have not problem with expecting them to practice what they preach.

        1. not = no

  7. “Mark Donahue, president of the Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, said he believes the state’s eavesdropping law is a good one. Allowing people to make audio recordings of arrests “could potentially inhibit an officer from proactively doing his job,” Donahue said.”

    Exactly what “proactive” measures does a cop need to take that cannot be recorded and subjected to public scrutiny? A “proactive” beating? Frame-up? Intimidation?

  8. burberry scarf,burberry scarf has been a worldwide business leader in selling high-quality consumer goods.
    burberry scarf had expanded our line from burberry scarf to a wider range.
    They are burberry scarf,burberry scarf.burberry scarf:do you want to buy it?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.