Mad Lib Legislation
Good to know that members of Congress continue to give careful, thoughtful consideration to the way they spend our money. Jim Harper explains the strange tale of H.R. 1586.
As we noted here before, this is a "shell bill." It was introduced as one thing (TARP taxes), became another thing (an aviation bill), and is now a batch of spending policies. (Cost: about $125 per family)
The most recent version of the bill was produced when the Senate passed a "substitute amendment." That's an amendment that clips out everything in the bill and puts in all new text.
In the House and Senate, they often publish amendments ahead of time, and it looks like someone was in a rush to get the amendment together, because they left blank lines where the new name of the bill should have been.
Take a look for yourself. Down toward the bottom of this page in the Congressional Record, it says, "SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the "_______Act of______". (The Library of Congress' Thomas reporting system picked that up as the "XXXXXXAct ofXXXX," so that's how it shows up on our site.)
Well, THAT's the amendment they brought up and passed, so the new name of the bill is the "_______Act of______."
That's right. A hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars spending bill made its way through Congress, and no one even noticed that the damn thing didn't have a name. Which also means you can probably count on one hand the number of lawmakers who actually know what's in the bill—and still have a finger left over to let them know what you think of this nonsense.
(ADDENDUM: Jacob Sullum beat me to this story by a week.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I VOTE "PRESENT"
Sure to be passed on a voice vote.
Love the AcornOnline.Com ad that comes up for this story.
You can't burn the constitution until you own one.
Just like Mad Libs, let a couple 12 year-olds fill in the blanks. It would likely be about the same as having Congress do it.
The Poo Act of Ass.
[snicker]
Just like Mad Libs, let a couple 12 year-olds fill in the blanks.
The Fart Act of Poop is probably just as good of a name.
I'm gonna grant the win to Butts on that one SF, since his name is more contextually appropriate.
*FIST PUMP*
The OMG Act of Butseks.
Jacob Sullum posted about this (with same Jim Harper link) last week. And as I said then, here's some background on why Congress uses shell bills. It's to end run around the Constitution.
The Constitution requires that money bills start in the House. They get around that by taking money bills that the House already passed, and then substituting for the entire text with something else. Even though it's entirely different, it's still somehow technically the "same bill" that "originated in the House," and then the House can pass the Senate version to make it law.
Even if the original House bill that passed was about taxing bonuses at companies that received TARP money, and the Senate bill is about throwing money at unionized public servants.
It's just important that the money is spent, not that it's spent on anything useful. We have to get those dollars a-multiplyin'. Just ask the Krugmeister.
Still maintain that it's only a matter of time before Congress starts passing "bills" consisting of a few PowerPoint slides.
I have yet to see a 2,000-page Powerpoint presentation, though I admit some of them have seemed that long.
Just whisper November, November, November... and then stick a loaded shotgun up the ass of every Republican while you intone the Congress shall make no law...
And there goes another $125 of my money, down the drain.
I coulda blown that money on booze and had a greater multiplication effect on the economy.
Exactly. I could blow the money on booze and tips for the waitress at a bar, who would buy blow, which would give money to a dealer, who would buy a Cadillac. I propose we call this the "Death of the American Luxury Automobile Industry Act of 2010".
"the lie back and take it Act of stimulation"
The Blank Check Act of 2010
In more respectable professions, I believe they refer to this as "Ass to Mouth."
You NEVER go ass to mouth!
The RAPE (Ravage America, Plunder Everything) Act of 2010.
"_______Act of______."
Now *that's* transparency in government.
The Perpetual Act of sodomy."
Thanks