Obama Administration Doubles Down on ObamaCare Double Counting
The Obama administration just can't quit double counting. In a report released earlier today, the administration declared that implementing some of the law's changes "extends the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by 12 years from 2017 to 2029, more than doubling the time before the exhaustion of the Trust Fund." And on a conference call this morning, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius also touted the extension of the trust fund.
Don't believe it. According to both the Congressional Budget Office and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the administration's claim is based on misleading double counting. Here's Medicare's chief actuary:
In practice the improved (Medicare hospital insurance) financing cannot be simultaneously used to finance other Federal outlays (such as the coverage expansions) and to extend the trust fund, despite the appearance of this result from the respective accounting conventions.
How do you get away with this sort of budgeting baloney in the face of such an obviously contrary report? If you're Kathleen Sebelius, you claim that it's all a matter of methodology, and that anyway, the Congressional Budget Office actually agrees with you. In an exchange with The American Spectator's Philip Klein this morning, Sebelius said that Medicare's chief actuary "has a different interpretation that is not agreed upon by either the Congressional Budget Office or the OMB or traditionally in Congress." Except that the CBO has, in fact, said that you can't double count the Medicare savings:
The key point is that the savings to the HI [Hospital Insurance] trust fund under the PPACA would be received by the government only once, so they cannot be set aside to pay for future Medicare spending and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation or on other programs….To describe the full amount of HI trust fund savings as both improving the government's ability to pay future Medicare benefits and financing new spending outside of Medicare would essentially double-count a large share of those savings and thus overstate the improvement in the government's fiscal position. [bold added]
Remember when the administration's top budget officer told the New York Times that "the president prefers to tell the truth, rather than make the numbers look better by pretending?" Turns out the administration likes to play make believe after all.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Caption: "I know it was you, Kathleen. You broke my heart. You broke my heart!"
Don't worry, I'm taking care of all of this.
Eat a plum.
Prunes.
Prune juice... a drink worthy of a Klingon warrior!
Makes you wonder if they can actually achieve their goal of completely obliterating the economy before the first week in November.
No! The government, lying? C'mon!
"We should stop meeting like this..."
"At least she's white."
"White man, white woman, white baby."
"Is this how babby formed?"
Airtight Grannies 3?
Want to go scuba diving?
"It's like kissing a chicken."
Michelle could kick her scrawny ass.
Threadjack:
The news in Phoenix is running a story that a Mexican drug cartel has put a bounty on our favorite sheriff.
If things start exploding, then we'll know that we fell through into a Michael Bay movie.
I'd suspect Danny Trejo would be heavily involved.
They fucked with the wrong Mexican
Since when does Lonewacko get to be played by DeNiro? Who the fuck did the casting for that movie?
Only if Meghan Fox is the assassin.
Jessica Alba is in it. I'm willing to be beaner-bait for that.
Two thoughts:
1. What are the odds that this started with Arpaio himself to gain more support for the immigration law?
2. If it's legit... is it wrong to root for the cartel?
Mandingo!
Is a ManDingo anything like ManBearPig?
Sort of, except it's half black, half black, and half penis.
(grins)
If you're Kathleen Sebelius, you claim that it's all a matter of methodology
I claim that it's all a matter of methodology.
"We both just threw up in our mouths a little."
Ah, the often-attempted but rarely-accomplished dual pukefelch.
That's how we know they're our betters.
They're just playing one of those party games where you have to pass a paperclip to your partner without using your hands.
But I do think I see him slipping her a little tongue.
I don't always agree with Suderman, but if I were the head of a major news network, I'd hire him every January to do a "Year in Pictures" montage.
That one up there's the best photo op kiss I've seen since MJ kissed Lisa Marie Presley.
Great article Suderman, you and Megan have both done yeoman work covering these issues.
Now, if we can just get her a job at a REAL magazine...
Remember when the administration's top budget officer told the New York Times that "the president prefers to tell the truth, rather than make the numbers look better by pretending?"
We've been over this. The statement is true - he prefers to tell the truth - but will certainly lie if it's to his advantage.
I mean, think about it. By saying that the President only prefers to tell the truth, Orszag was admitting that lies will be told. It's just a matter of when and how big.
An administration official says the president doesn't want to do something, and then another administration official does it.
In the burned-out crust that passes for a brain among Reason true believers, this passes for a contradiction.
In the burned-out crust that passes for a brain among Reason true believers, this passes for acontradiction SNAFU.
FTFY
She's lucky it isn't Gore slipping his evil tongue down her throat.
In a twisted way, this Administration pronouncement actually makes sense. The rest of the "Medicare trust fund", you see, is also money that the government has already spent. So adding one more fictitious sum to an already fictitious trust fund is pretty much fair game; if people are going to believe in the trust fund in the first place (which is about on par with believing in the tooth fairy), they should believe in this addition to it.