Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Tattoo Tuesday: Now With Mad Scientists!

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 7.13.2010 1:12 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

In the December issue of Reason, I wrote about the universe of underworld tattoos—those useful inkblots that indicate to those in the know who you were in prison with, and why, and what kind of employment you might be seeking, all without the trouble of taking out an ad in the classified section.

Getting dirty words tattooed on your eyelids—a popular choice, judging from the mug shots available online—is a serious commitment. It is, as social scientists say, a "signal that is costly to fake." The bearer of a facial tattoo announces to the world: I expect to be in prison for most of my life, or to hang out with people who consider prison experience a character reference.

Today, via the Twitter feed of Brock N. Meeks, comes the chance to take a look at some of those tattoos, removed from criminals and autopsied dead bodies, creepily preserved in formaldehyde, and analysed for patterns by the Department of Forensic Medicine at Jagiellonian University in Krakow:

The majority of the prison tattoos represent connections between the convicts. Besides gestures and mimics it is a kind of secret code—revealing why 'informative' tattoos appeared on uncovered body parts: face, neck or arms.

The collection was created with a view to deciphering the code—among prisoners known as a 'pattern language'. By looking closely at the prisoners' tattoos, their traits, temper, past, place of residence or the criminal group in which they were involved could be determined. 

In Poland, tattoos are common among criminals….In the 1960s in Poland, getting a prison tattoo required special skills and criminal ambition – it was a kind of ennoblement, each tattoo in the criminal world was meaningful.

See the whole slide show here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Dancing on Hitler's Face

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PolicyCultureCriminal JusticeSocial Science
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (23)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Enough About Palin   15 years ago

    "The bearer of a facial tattoo announces to the world: I expect to be in prison for most of my life, or to hang out with people who consider prison experience a character reference."

    I know several people with face-tats. Both men and women. and what it says is that they are in a punk band or are freinds of the band. They are all very good people.

    1. The Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

      It does actually signal that a person is not interested in "square", normal, establishment employment, though.

    2. R C Dean   15 years ago

      It also signals that they are either (a) independently, fabulously wealthy, so that they will never in their life need a job, (b) incredibly short-sighted, in that they believe they will never in their life need a job, or (c) planning to make their criminal hobbies a career.

      1. Enough About Palin   15 years ago

        Or (d) successful tattoo artists, musicians...

  2. Fist of Etiquette   15 years ago

    My prison tattoo is a detailed representation of me rising from the grave and stabbing the forensics professor who harvested my prison tattoo for his public grant fueled study of prison tattoos.

    1. The Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

      Yes!

  3. Ragin Cajun   15 years ago

    Hey, throw in a little salt with that formaldehyde...tattoo jerky!

  4. Tim   15 years ago

    Maybe we should make smokers get the Surgeon General's warnings tattooed on their hide.

  5. B.P.   15 years ago

    Ilsa Koch was unavailable for comment.

  6. SugarFree   15 years ago

    Can you make human rinds? Would the ink make them taste different? I WANT TO EAT YOUR DEEP-FRIED TATTOOS! GIVE THEM TO ME!

    1. Episiarch   15 years ago

      Dude, you better get your blood sugar under control.

    2. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

      Of course. Where you been?

      1. SugarFree   15 years ago

        Work. It's horrible when you actually have to do your job. I'll make those bastards pay, though. Oh, they'll pay dearly.

  7. The Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

    No Eastern Promises references? Not even a Sin Nombre reference?

    1. SugarFree   15 years ago

      They are just a bunch of pop-cult savages, Artie.

      1. The Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

        Heh heh heh. Apparently this film is really hard to find.

    2. Tim   15 years ago

      I was reminded of Dr. Hannibal Lecter.

  8. R C Dean   15 years ago

    WTF is with skinning these people? Couldn't they just take a fargin' picture?

    1. LarryA   15 years ago

      In 1900? Photography was pretty primitive, and it was long before color film.

      And no, I'm not quite that old.

      1. SugarFree   15 years ago

        Modern chemistry was available by 1900, and the 1880's dry plate glass negative and gelatin, collodion, and matte collodion printing out papers could reproduce a tattoo in great detail. Even 1860s wet plate glass negative and albumen papers would resolve well enough for a tattoo.

        Although, you are correct about color. Autochromes, the first commercial color process was not widely available until 1906.

        And I think they skinned people because it was funnier than taking a picture. Or he could have be bound for an application of anthropodermic bibliopegy

  9. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Couldn't they just take a fargin' picture?

    How do you make a lampshade with a picture?

  10. better not say   15 years ago

    So we have a friend who is 16 and my wife has made me promise not to tell her that I think that a warning with her birthday should be tattooed to her bottom.

  11. Sam Michas   15 years ago

    tattoo is art!and if you like this kind of art you must make a really big and detailed tattoo in your body!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!