Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

Audio/Transcript of My Discussion on NPR About Recording Police

Radley Balko | 7.9.2010 10:10 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

You can now listen to archived audio or read the transcript from my appearance on NPR's Talk of the Nation yesterday.

The topic is the legality of recording on-duty police officers.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Is Nullification Constitutional?

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

Civil LibertiesCultureRadioPoliceFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Kim Jones   15 years ago

    Why is it OK for police to record us with their dash cams but not ok for us to record them? Doesnt make any sense.

    http://www.web-anonymity.au.tc

  2. mr simple   15 years ago

    I liked how you kept the conversation on topic, Balko, and it was refreshing to hear the cops that called in welcome civilian surveillance, but the moderator seemed absolutely clueless, and not in a devil's advocate kind of way.

    1. Virginia   15 years ago

      I give the mod some credit since it was a very one-sided discussion. Even the cops who called in said that citizen journalists were a good thing.

      And nice droid plug.

      1. WTF   15 years ago

        I'm sure you'll explain how they are a bad thing.

  3. Nick   15 years ago

    Can someone explain to me how wiretapping laws work? If I send a private email to my friend, I have an expectation of privacy. If I say the same thing on this site I said to my friend, I have no expectation of privacy. If you say something in any official capacity as an officer or government official or any citizen in a public place, why is there any expectation of privacy? There isn't, or there shouldn't be.

    1. WTF   15 years ago

      Depends on state law. As to whether a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to a particular communication, it depends on what the codified state law says as well as any authoritative court decisions. Electronic communications such as e-mail and blog comments typically are treated differently than in-person oral communication, and from radio or telephone conversations.

      "It depends" always is a safe answer. It's one of the first things you learn in law school.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

These Progressives Seek to 'Disempower' the Courts

Damon Root | 12.30.2025 7:00 AM

Zohran Mamdani Didn't Run on 'Affordability.' He Ran Against Prices.

Peter Suderman | From the February/March 2026 issue

Brickbat: Dog Gone

Charles Oliver | 12.30.2025 4:00 AM

Innocent Man Sues for Over $60,000 After Police Blew Up His Business. A Court Says He's Entitled to Nothing.

Billy Binion | 12.29.2025 5:37 PM

These Companies Want To Use AI To Make Cheaper and Cleaner Energy—If the Government Lets Them

Jeff Luse | 12.29.2025 4:09 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks