Ron Paul on 2012: Haven't Decided; Good Year for Libertarians; Check out Gary Johnson
The Daily Caller interviews the rEVOLutionary about the current political moment and the next presidential election cycle. Excerpt:
Noting the "big libertarian influence in the Tea Party movement," Paul says libertarian beliefs are making their way into the lexicon of traditional Republicans.
"I think even the issue of the Federal Reserve — that issue is almost mainstream," he said. "And I think things have shifted because of the financial crisis as well as the bogging down of our foreign policy. So the American people are looking for some different answers."
Paul, whose anti-Iraq war views won him jeers at some Republican events in 2008, says a libertarian-minded GOP candidate will be better received when Obama runs for re-election. But he cautioned that he himself has not decided to run. "It's too early for me to talk much about that because I haven't made a decision. I haven't ruled it out, but I'm not on the verge of making a decision anytime soon," Paul said.
Asked to name other potential presidential candidates he could support, Paul replied, "I guess the best one would be Johnson from New Mexico — Gary Johnson."
Whole thing here.
From the Reason archive: Brian Doherty's February 2008 cover story on the Paul campaign, Doherty's November 2009 feature on Paul's anti-Federal Reserve initiatives, and Reason.tv's February 2010 interview with Gary Johnson, the condensed version of which you can view below:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who gives a fuck about this douche?
Funny you should ask, idiot.
I'm serious. The guy's a fucking freak. I believe he's little more than an attention whore.
You mean, compared to any other successful politician?
Millions of people support Ron Paul. Try not being a cynic once and a while.
Millions of people support Lady Gaga too. The two are indistinguishable.
Lady Gaga has written sensible tracts about reforming the monetary system?
Who knew?
I guess you've never heard "Bad Romance." It's a rather scathing take on the union of the central bank and the government.
That really makes a lot of sense dude.
Lou
http://www.total-anonymity.tk
Funny, I actually agree with both Ron Paul and Eric Dondero: Gary Johnson would be a great pick - I'd vote for him either as GOP or Libertarian.
Of course, I doubt he'd make it past the primaries in the GOP...
Gather...your...armies!
I'm totally on the Gary Johnson bandwagon.
Forlornly counting down to the day that somebody figures out a way to brand him as a racist...
Tara, he's pretty much a libertarian. What more do they need?
Out of the way, old man! Gary Johnson should be the libertarian GOP standardbearer. Paul is damaged goods.
Paul/Paul 2012!
More racist newsletters and segregated lunch counters, less pot and EVOL for the faggots!
I've been calling this for well over a year now: Paul will run again in 2012 only if Gary Johnson doesn't get up enough steam to do better than Paul would. And no one can really say how well Johnson will do until after the mid-term elections.
seriously, fuck cato
Paul: equally hated by liberals and conservatives. My kind of guy.
Ron Paul's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.
Pip, you have a wonderful dry sense of humor.
Pip what evidence do you have to support any of that? Just curious.
It's a joke.
Ted Kennedy said that about Robert Bork in his confirmation hearing.