Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

What's the Spanish Word for Straitjacket?

Jesse Walker | 5.18.2010 9:18 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's being reported that Woody Allen has told a Spanish newspaper that he'd like Barack Obama to "be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly." Things like this, presumably:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Grayson Concedes in Kentucky GOP Senate Primary; Rand Paul the Winner

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

CultureMovies
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (82)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. pantsfan   15 years ago

    Shut the fuck up, Woody Allen

    1. G Mc   15 years ago

      Yeah like libertarian's never thought out loud: I wish a libertarian was in charge of everything!

      1. G Mc   15 years ago

        *have never thought out loud - oops, you fuckers!

        1. Max   15 years ago

          Yeah, but for a libertarian to be "in charge" would be to do nothing 😉
          Else, he wouldn't be a libertarian anymore. Well, you could argue he would try to repeal a lot of stuff and then do nothing =)

      2. Adam   15 years ago

        Actually, no. No serious libertarian would ever think that, because any serious libertarian knows that the problem is institutions, not people. It's the institutions and the incentives they create that lead to big government. Put a libertarian in office, he or she is liable to turn out just like them rest of 'em.

        1. Attorney   15 years ago

          This ^

      3. x,y   15 years ago

        Yeah like libertarian's never thought out loud...

        By definition, we have not. Neither have you.

      4. Banjos Kick Ass!   15 years ago

        You have to win in the battlefield of ideas. If you use force as a means push limited government, or no government on the masses, there will be a backlash. Plus the whole institution thing that Adam points out.

  2. PIRS   15 years ago

    "What's the Spanish Word for Straitjacket?"

    Camisa de fuerza

    or

    Chaleco de fuerza

    1. Jesse Walker   15 years ago

      Tell it to Fielding Mellish.

    2. Sherrif Arpaio   15 years ago

      Let's see some ID, senor.

  3. TheOtherSomeGuy   15 years ago

    chaqueta recta

  4. JW   15 years ago

    Maybe he could do something about really, really creepy old men fucking their not-legally-but-for-all-intents-and-purposes-step children.

    1. Groovus Maximus   15 years ago

      Indeed JW. Whatever happened to the real reason to have children: boinking the babysitter?

      1. Mrs. Maximus   15 years ago

        Can you pick up a jug of milk, eggs, butter, and Leuprolide Acetate?

      2. One of the Kennedys   15 years ago

        Exactly.

    2. Les   15 years ago

      Not really for all intents and purposes. He never lived with Farrow and rarely spent the night in her house. Also she was an autonomous adult at the time. Not saying it wasn't a dick move or supporting his recent silly statements, but let's stick to the facts.

    3. Zeb   15 years ago

      I really can't get excited about that. Two consenting adults can have whatever relationship they want.

  5. Colin   15 years ago

    Yes, and he also defended Polanski recently, too.

    1. Atanarjuat   15 years ago

      Don't know why anyone would listen to him after that.

      1. Atanarjuat   15 years ago

        ...at a time when we're increasing penalties for sexual criminals, etc.

        1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

          The SC just upheld indefinite detention for the "sexually dangerous". I think Mr. Allen should go away for a while...

  6. PIRS   15 years ago

    Woody Allen wants Obama to have dictatorial powers but does not want the police to have the power to arrest child rapists like Roman Polanski?

    1. Fielding Mellish   15 years ago

      Doing a sociological study on perversion. I'm up to Advanced Child Molesting.

    2. This Dave   15 years ago

      Well under the "right" kind of dictatorship, you and your friends are not held to such base things as laws and bourgoisie morals

  7. Groovus Maximus   15 years ago

    It's being reported that Woody Allen has told a Spanish newspaper that he'd like Barack Obama to "be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly."

    I find it amazing that Progressive American Jews would be in favor of a dictatorship when Jews have been on the short end of the stick historically regarding despots of all political flavors.

    1. PIRS   15 years ago

      They are progressives. It all makes sense if you understand progressivism.

      1. Max   15 years ago

        Well, not all of them, only the shrill ones. The "in your face, you b*stard" kind of gays. The rest are very divers actually.

        1. PIRS   15 years ago

          Groovus Maximus specified progressive ones. I know very well that American Jewish people represent a wide variety of political viewpoints. Groovus Maximus was only refering to the progessive ones.

    2. JW   15 years ago

      Yep. I never understood that either. Same for gays. How is that minorities traditionally oppressed by the state easily promise their fealty to the state? WTF?

      1. Coeus   15 years ago

        If they were logical, they wouldn't be progressives.

        1. Hobo Chang Ba   15 years ago

          Remember - you are actually assuming the modern Left is actually "progressive." If you look at the results of their actual economic policies, they are as regressive as it gets.

      2. skr   15 years ago

        stockholm syndrome?

      3. smartass sob   15 years ago

        How is that minorities traditionally oppressed by the state easily promise their fealty to the state? WTF?

        Perhaps they think they'll get to run things.

      4. John C. Randolph   15 years ago

        Yeah, someone ought to explain to gay advocacy groups exactly how Castro and Kim treat gays in their respective workers' paradises.

        -jcr

        1. Max   15 years ago

          Or for that matter how Che treated them 😉

      5. G Mc   15 years ago

        Well, in American history (in the modern era), the federal state has been the most effective advocate for minority groups. So there's the answer.

        1. JW   15 years ago

          You mean once they get done stomping their faces into the dirt?

        2. Zeb   15 years ago

          But how does it follow that they should also support all of the other shit the state tries to do that has nothing to do with protecting people's rights?

    3. Hugh Akston   15 years ago

      Come on, you guys. We just need the right dictator in charge. Then everything will be fine.

      Don't you know that old saying: "Absolute power corrupts absolutely everyone except good public servants"?

    4. Paul   15 years ago

      I find it amazing that Progressive American Jews would be in favor of a dictatorship when Jews have been on the short end of the stick historically regarding despots of all political flavors.

      This is the right kind of dictatorship.

      Like I said, fuck my neighbor. You think I'm going to trust him to not vote my freedoms away? He'd do it in a second given the chance.

      1. Naga Sadow   15 years ago

        Yes. Yes, I will.

        Where ya been by the way? Haven't seen you at you know where.

  8. Ryback's Cook   15 years ago

    Woody Allen is a weirdo creep?

    1. PIRS   15 years ago

      But he is good a creating new dialogue for a Japanese language film.

      1. Episiarch   15 years ago

        SPARTAN DOG!

  9. Dee Woodmans   15 years ago

    Yeah buddy, I think you hit that one on the head!

    Lou
    http://www.web-anonymity.cz.tc

  10. Dan   15 years ago

    Nice

  11. JazzPiano (Jamie Kelly)   15 years ago

    Short, stupid Jews afraid of death and terrified of not cumming anymore are of not interest to me.

    1. Metronome   15 years ago

      You missed a note 😉

  12. Mr. Chartreuse   15 years ago

    http://mises.org/books/trts/

    Wow, Woody decided to go straight for page 10.

  13. Nick   15 years ago

    His movies suck as much as his statements to Spanish newspapers. What a fucking waste of film.

  14. Brian   15 years ago

    Sounds like he's calling for an Enabling Act.

    At the risk of glennbecking up this thread, I must point out that the last time that happened, it didn't turn out so great for people like Woody Allen.

    1. JazzPiano (Jamie Kelly)   15 years ago

      That's called "Godwinning." And you're the Godwinner.
      Congratulations! Here's your Jew's tooth.

  15. mike_twincities   15 years ago

    It's good to be the king. When you are already part of his court, that is...

    Fucking lib elitist bastards. Fuck them and they're ivy-schmeeg edumacashuns.

    Live free, fight, or fall.

  16. Aresen   15 years ago

    Ah, yes. Gaius Julius Obama.

    Or maybe Lucius Cornelius Obama.

    I can hardly wait for the proscriptions.

    1. Kolohe   15 years ago

      I thought Bush already did that with Medicare Part D?

  17. People Power Hour   15 years ago

    Woody = FAIL

  18. a   15 years ago

    Hehe, that whole draw Muhammad thing blew up in your faces, huh? Who woulda thunk that encouraging people to be vicious and hateful would result in... people being vicious and hateful? I mean, who could have seen that coming?

    1. The Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

      ?????

    2. Nitori Kawashiro   15 years ago

      And where did the comments section for that post go?

      1. SC Recat   15 years ago

        The comments crossed the road with the rest of the 'chickens'.

        http://www.whydidthechickencro.....cluck2.wav

        1. Nitori Kawashiro   15 years ago

          Reason chickened out too? We're still going to see all those Mohamed images though?

          1. SC Recat   15 years ago

            They cut-off commenting, denied access to published comments, and they are likely to threetreat?

  19. Big Chief   15 years ago

    If Woody wants to live in a dictatorship there are plenty around to choose from. I'm sure they're doing the same wonderful things an Obama dictatorship would do.

    So feel free to emigrate, Woody. I'm sure you and fearless leader could collaborate on some wonderful new films in North Korea. And I understand they have free health care too!

    1. This Dave   15 years ago

      Seriously. Go fucking live under a dictatorship, under the rules that everyone else has to follow. Chavez has a really socialisty well-intentioned one, right? Just fucking go there.

  20. John C. Randolph   15 years ago

    A Jew calling for a dictatorship? Gee, what could possibly go wrong? I'm sure that a Hopey McChange dictatorship wouldn't be anything at all like the one that killed six million Jews, would it?

    Rather sad to see senility in someone whose work I've enjoyed in the past. I hope he's comfortable in the rest home.

    -jcr

    1. Candystriper   15 years ago

      Keep your dick in your pants, Mr. Allen!

  21. jester   15 years ago

    The Inquisition...Let's begin,
    The Inquisition...Look out sin.

    Yes, despotism has been a bad plan. King Ferdinand was at least a quarter Jew, so even the bloodlines can't be trusted.

    Woody Allen has made many a clever, funny flick. That's one thing. Advocating government...he's getting close to the idiocy of a certain Mia Farrow.

    1. allsight   15 years ago

      Interiors was hilarious! Woody was very funny back in the day.

    2. tarran   15 years ago

      The Curse of the Jade Scorpion, which is a fairly recent movie is pretty good too.

      1. Rhayader   15 years ago

        I thought Woody's "Whatever Works" with Larry David was pretty funny too -- at least for the first hour or so -- and that just came out very recently.

  22. Ryback's Cook   15 years ago

    Schrodinger's cat is <blink>not</blink> dead.

  23. hurly buerhle   15 years ago

    I draw the line at spending any time considering the politics of a man who make a piece of crap like "Mighty Aphrodite".

    1. Les   15 years ago

      Artists in general shouldn't have their politics considered. But Woody's earned his clunkers, since he's made so many brilliant movies.

  24. cynical   15 years ago

    The good thing about a Progressive dictatorship, if we manage to come out of it with our lives and liberties intact, is that it will eliminate any remaining misconceptions moderates might have against the liberalism of the progressive elites in Hollywood, academia, etc.

    I'd love to see every one of those assholes, from Hollywood to academia to the NYT to the CPSI be tarred with the same brush used to paint neo-Nazis.

    1. Zeb   15 years ago

      I see your point, but I would rather continue enjoying art, film and music even if it is created by people with stupid ideas about politics.

  25. Rhayader   15 years ago

    "I once stole a pornographic book that was printed in braille. I used to rub the dirty parts."

  26. WTF   15 years ago

    Once upon a time, Woody Allen was funny. I always liked his standup routine about meeting the gorgeous blonde Asian girl on the bus, who told him she was a nymphomaniac, but attracted only to Jewish cowboys. So he introduced himself as Bucky Goldstein.

    And Sleeper and Take the Money and Run are pretty good, too.

    These days, he's laughable, but he's not funny.

    1. Groovus Maximus   15 years ago

      I always liked his standup routine about meeting the gorgeous blonde Asian girl on the bus, who told him she was a nymphomaniac, but attracted only to Jewish cowboys. So he introduced himself as Bucky Goldstein.

      So did Steven Wright, the comic that performed that bit.

  27. Hobo Chang Ba   15 years ago

    Not to defend him, but let he who hath not said "a benevolent dictatorship would be the most effective form of government" throw the first stone. Being effective is often possible with coercive state powers.

    That does not mean it is the system we want or prefer. Most of us like it when government is ineffective and/or leaves us alone. But suppose we had a dictator who said "none of these authoritarian laws apply anymore. Here's all of your tax dollars back. You are all now liberated but I'm going to stay in power to make sure nobody tries to interfere with your freedoms. Freely criticize me all you want." - would that be preferable to a democracy where majority rule will almost always elect babysitters and autocrats?

  28. Charlie   15 years ago

    Strange. As quoted, it's a comic take on George Bush's well-known statement that he would prefer to be a dictator. You don't remember that? Bush said it three times, on three separate occasions.

    As initially reported by Fox, there was a set of dots in there to show that Allen's comment had been "edited", much like they "edited" Shirley Sherrod, I presume. Why has Reason Magazine removed the marks of editing, I wonder?

  29. vitor   14 years ago

    camisa de fuerza

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!