Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Gonna Kick Tomorrow, Entitlement Edition

Matt Welch | 4.8.2010 10:32 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hey look, Ben Bernanke is stating the long-obvious about federal entitlements and fiscal horror!

The U.S. population will change significantly in coming decades with the combined effect of the decline in fertility rates following the baby boom and increasing longevity. As our population ages, the ratio of working-age Americans to older Americans will fall, which could hold back the long-run prospects for living standards in our country. The aging of the population also will have a major impact on the federal budget, most dramatically on the Social Security and Medicare programs, particularly if the cost of health care continues to rise at its historical rate. Thus, we must begin now to prepare for this coming demographic transition.

The economist Herb Stein once famously said, "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop." That adage certainly applies to our nation's fiscal situation. Inevitably, addressing the fiscal challenges posed by an aging population will require a willingness to make difficult choices. The arithmetic is, unfortunately, quite clear. To avoid large and unsustainable budget deficits, the nation will ultimately have to choose among higher taxes, modifications to entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, less spending on everything else from education to defense, or some combination of the above. These choices are difficult, and it always seems easier to put them off–until the day they cannot be put off any more. But unless we as a nation demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal responsibility, in the longer run we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth.

Wow, sounds like we better tackle that crisis head-on! Or not:

Today the economy continues to operate well below its potential, which implies that a sharp near-term reduction in our fiscal deficit is probably neither practical nor advisable. However, nothing prevents us from beginning now to develop a credible plan for meeting our long-run fiscal challenges. Indeed, a credible plan that demonstrated a commitment to achieving long-run fiscal sustainability could lead to lower interest rates and more rapid growth in the near term.

A credible plan that demonstrates commitment. That is really how debased and gutless our officialdom has become. Though coming from a guy who describes mortgage foreclosures as a "market failure," this should come as no surprise. The political class of this country remains in total denial.

Reason on Helicopter Ben here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Morning Links: Obama Signs Nukes Treaty, "Behavior Placement," Naked Coffee Guy Cleared

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PolicyEconomicsNanny StatePensionsEntitlements
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (60)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Steve Nash Equilibrium   15 years ago

    Anyone doubt that Maobama will sell VAT as the only option to solve the problem?

    1. Mike M.   15 years ago

      Nope, it's already been decided by the so-called elites that it's happening. It's only a question of when, and my guess is probably right after the November election.

      1. West Texas Boy   15 years ago

        This. They are going to shit on the carpet on the way out the door, just watch.

      2. West Texas Boy   15 years ago

        The next part of the equation being that then in the next election cycle they can point to "reduced" deficits being in place just before the evil red team came in and started tearing everything down.

  2. CoyoteBlue   15 years ago

    Giant Lizard of the Year

    Maybe we should have a meeting to discuss the feasibility of forming a committee to plan a path to addressing this whole "credible plan" idea. [Blue Ribbons optional]

    1. CaptainSmartass   15 years ago

      Whoa whoa whoa, slow down there, let's not rush this thing. I propose drafting a plan to formulate the possibility of assembling a steering committee to work on your proposed meeting before we get too far into it.

      1. Gabe   15 years ago

        This is a roadmap to sustainability. Prepare to draft a plan.

  3. hurly buehrle   15 years ago

    Wow, all that bashing my head against the wall just now really gave me a headache.

    This is the money quote: Today the economy continues to operate well below its potential, which implies that a sharp near-term reduction in our fiscal deficit is probably neither practical nor advisable.

    Surely a massive reduction in government spending would spell nothing but doom for the nation's economy. Thank goodness august economic minds like this control our country's money supply.

  4. J sub D   15 years ago

    Indeed, a credible plan that demonstrated a commitment to achieving long-run fiscal sustainability could lead to lower interest rates and more rapid growth in the near term.

    This would be what, the 53rd "long-run fiscal sustainability" plan since 1970?

    Yeah, that'll fix everything.

    1. JW   15 years ago

      Hey now, don't be so cynical. That's fewer than the number of governments that Italy has had since then.

      1. CaptainSmartass   15 years ago

        Yes, let's continue to judge our nation's success by the metric set by Italy. What could possibly go wrong?

        1. JW   15 years ago

          As long as we can get long, lazy summer lunches in the piazza, I'm all good with it.

  5. fish   15 years ago

    Its just sad...the mental contortions that some guys (Bernanke) will put themselves through to keep drawing a government check.

    Have just a bit of self respect and resign.

    1. DanD   15 years ago

      But...but...he's the Man of the Year! Time said so! Without him single-handedly saving our economy, we'd all be eating shoe leather and cardboard!

  6. ed   15 years ago

    The political class of this country remains in total denial.

    Some of them do, certainly. But I think those at the top recognize that time is running out, and the window of opportunity for their long-cherished social agenda is closing. They are getting while the getting is good, and damn the consequences.

    1. Geoff   15 years ago

      Agree whole heartedly.

  7. steve   15 years ago

    A bunch of chicken-littles you are, David Brooks says everything will turn out fine:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/opinion/06brooks.html

    1. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

      Interesting and perhaps Brooks is right. Unfortunately the demographers have always been wrong so there is no reason to believe their forecasts today.

    2. CaptainSmartass   15 years ago

      He didn't mention anything about the domes that will encase cities and not one word about flying cars. So what does he know about The Future??

      1. Pablo   15 years ago

        I didn't RTFA. Did he talk about how it's OK for old people to be on the Science Diet?

        1. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

          It almost looks like Brooks pulled that whole thing out of his ass. He could be right, though, I suppose. Predictin' the future is, as you all have said, a crapshoot.

    3. Kolohe   15 years ago

      I really didn't need to see David Brooks's face with the words 'luscious orgy' next to it.

      1. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

        Ha ha, with the pink shirt, too!

  8. JW   15 years ago

    To avoid large and unsustainable budget deficits, the nation will ultimately have to choose among higher taxes, modifications to entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, less spending on everything else from education to defense, or some combination of the above.

    Gosh, I wonder which option our masters will choose?

    1. Slut Bunwalla   15 years ago

      The snark-o-meter is reading higher than I've ever seen before, keptin!

  9. Warren   15 years ago

    doom
    DoooM
    DOOOOM

  10. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

    The problems are very real but the one demographic Bernake overlooked is that my kid's generation is a bit larger than the baby boomers.

    Going into the 1990's the demographics actually looked worse than they do now.

    We can stick it to these 60 million kids, good and hard.

    They'll support us boomers long into dementia in the way that we would have liked to become accustomed to except that we kept on re-financing the house to pay off the credit cards and the Beemers.....

    1. West Coaster   15 years ago

      Good to see a post from you, TWC. They've been few-and-far-between lately.

    2. Stereo Apple   15 years ago

      We can stick it to these 60 million kids, good and hard.

      They'll support us boomers long into dementia in the way that we would have liked to become accustomed to except that we kept on re-financing the house to pay off the credit cards and the Beemers.....

      As a 26 year old, let me just go ahead and say, "fuck your entire stupid generation of entitled cocksmokers."

      1. Jordan   15 years ago

        Easy now. I'm pretty sure he was joking.

        1. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

          Right, Jordan, you would think that would be obvious to the lad, wouldn't you? Ahh, but sometimes I can be a bit obscure. Didn't think so this time, though.

      2. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

        Thanks West Coaster. I haven't been around here much lately, tis true.

      3. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

        Ha! I've never bought a pack of White Owls in my life.

        But hold on, Baby Boomers didn't give you the Great Society, Socialist Security, or Socialized Medicine. The Greatest Generation and their parents did that are the dummies that did that by electing LBJ and FDR. So while the boomers deserve scorn....wait for it.....

        We Didn't Start The Fire!

        1. JW   15 years ago

          Great. Now I have Bowie's Cat People stuck in my head.

        2. ed   15 years ago

          Baby Boomers didn't give you the Great Society, Socialist Security, or Socialized Medicine. The Greatest Generation and their parents did that

          Indeed, TWC. To validate your thesis, I submit this "joke," forwarded to me a couple minutes ago by my elderly father, as passed along through his "greatest generation" Republican buddies:

          George Bush, Queen Elizabeth, and Vladimir Putin all die and go to hell. While there, they spy a red phone and ask what the phone is for. The devil tells them it is for calling back to Earth. Putin asks to call Russia and talks for 5 minutes. When he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is one million dollars, so Putin writes him a check. Next, Queen Elizabeth calls England and talks for 30 minutes. When she is finished the devil informs her that the cost is 6 million dollars, so she writes him a check. Finally George Bush gets his turn, and he talks for 4 hours. When he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is $5.00. When Putin hears this he goes ballistic and asks the devil why Bush's call to the USA was so cheap!! The devil smiles and replies: "Since Obama took over, the country has gone to hell, so it's a local call."

          Sigh.

          1. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

            Really, really, really good points.

            1. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

              Can we also somehow blame the people who voted for Woodrow Wilson?

              1. Citizen Nothing   15 years ago

                Don't blame me. I haven't voted for a winner in 30 years. True story.

                1. JW   15 years ago

                  You've got me by a couple years, but same here.

                2. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

                  Well, you got me beat.

              2. ed   15 years ago

                I blame Plato. Dana Plato.

          2. Slut Bunwalla   15 years ago

            The first sentence all by itself is kind of a nice little mini-joke.

          3. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

            Yes, it is a local call. Dam shame, too, because Muddy Waters Long Distance Call is much better. 🙂

      4. ed   15 years ago

        Har har. The 26-year-old scolds the "entitled."

        1. Colonel_Angus   15 years ago

          The 26 year old, having something forcefully taken from his paycheck to pay for something that he will not see anywhere near a full return of the benefits of? Or, the 26 year old who will be paying for the coming housing bailout round two for the boomers in a mortgage over their heads, with very little retirement investment?

          1. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

            Col, we're all paying and the last guy to get a decent ROI of his social security tax was my grandfather.

            Let me go out on a limb here and predict that social security will become a welfare program for indigent old people within 15 years.

        2. The Wine Commonsewer (TWC)   15 years ago

          No, the 26 year old doesn't know whose on his side and who isn't.

  11. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Indeed, a credible plan that demonstrated a commitment to achieving long-run fiscal sustainability could lead to lower interest rates and more rapid growth in the near term.

    All the serious people agree; there is no chance of inflation in the foreseeable future.

    1. R C Dean   15 years ago

      a credible plan that demonstrated a commitment to achieving long-run fiscal sustainability could lead to lower interest rates and more rapid growth in the near term.

      WTF is he talking about? How could rates get any lower than they are now?

  12. West Texas Boy   15 years ago

    Political competence these days is not about actually solving problems, it's about leg strength between elections.

    As in, how far can you kick that damn can down the road until we have to look at it again, and if we make it bigger could you still kick it? Wow, what a great leader he is!

    1. Matt Welch   15 years ago

      I will be stealing that line, thanks.

  13. swillfredo pareto   15 years ago

    Indeed, a credible plan that demonstrated a commitment to achieving long-run fiscal sustainability could lead to lower interest rates and more rapid growth in the near term.

    Because nothing says fiscal sustainability like untrammeled growth of government spending. I hear Bernake is a shoe-in for the First Annual Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence

    1. that guy   15 years ago

      I'd rather give the award to the inanimate carbon rod.

    2. Kolohe   15 years ago

      'They're saying "Boo-rnake"'

  14. kc   15 years ago

    "could lead to lower interest rates..."
    I'm no economist, but how much lower can/should interest rates they go?

  15. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Caption contest:

    "If, by 'person' you mean 'steaming pile of dog shit'."

  16. Ron L   15 years ago

    "Today the economy continues to operate well below its potential, which implies that a sharp near-term reduction in our fiscal deficit is probably neither practical nor advisable."

    Translation:
    'Yeah, I'll quit. I mean it! But how about just one more hit? That can't hurt anything.'

  17. Colonel_Angus   15 years ago

    "Today the economy continues to operate well below its potential, which implies that a sharp near-term reduction in our fiscal deficit is probably neither practical nor advisable."

    Translation: Let's just wait until we can take more money from the economy. What the fuck.

  18. Punster   15 years ago

    When the government is taking more than half your income something has gone wrong. http://www.kentculver.com/blog/?p=143

    1. Colonel_Angus   15 years ago

      When the government is taking more than like 10%... if it must even be taxed at all.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!