Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Does Concern About Warrantless Searches and Detention Without Trial Mark You As a Right-Winger?

Jacob Sullum | 2.17.2010 1:22 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Because I waded all the way through David Barstow's feature story on the Tea Party movement, which consumed two full pages in Monday's New York Times, I feel a need to justify that effort by posting a few comments. The short version of the story is that Tea Party activists are a diverse group, ranging all the way from harmless cranks to racist conspiracy theorists. Yet Barstow is repeatedly confounded by details that do not fit his easy portrait of right-wing weirdos. He notes that Oath Keepers, one of the groups attracted by the Tea Party movement, "recruits military and law enforcement officials who are asked to disobey orders the group deems unconstitutional," such as "orders to conduct warrantless searches, arrest Americans as unlawful enemy combatants, or force civilians into 'any form of detention camps.'" Although Barstow seems to consider these scenarios outlandish, all three are actual policies that were implemented or at least contemplated by the Bush and/or Obama administrations. And it is hard to see why concern about them is an especially right-wing phenomenon, as the headline on the story proclaims. If anyhing, such civil liberty anxieties are more associated with the left, as Barstow semi-acknowledges:

In some ways…their main answer [to overweening government]—strict adherence to the Constitution—would comfort every card-carrying A.C.L.U. member.

But their vision of the federal government is frequently at odds with the one that both parties have constructed. Tea Party gatherings are full of people who say they would do away with the Federal Reserve, the federal income tax and countless agencies, not to mention bailouts and stimulus packages. Nor is it unusual to hear calls to eliminate Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. A remarkable number say this despite having recently lost jobs or health coverage.

Why "but"? Democrats and Republicans both violate the Constitution, though in somewhat different ways, when they're in power. Even the ACLU's agenda is not the same as either major party's. And once you go beyond that group's focus on certain provisions in the Bill of Rights and contemplate the implications of the enumerated powers doctrine, why would you be agree with either party's platform? Also note Barstow's surprise that people could have political principles that they follow even when it is not in their immediate self-interest to do so. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 'Economists' (at Least Three!) Agree It's Impossible to Cut the Deficit Without Tax Hikes

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).

PoliticsCivil LibertiesLibertarian History/Philosophy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (38)

Latest

Florida Applies for Federal Reimbursement for 'Alligator Alcatraz' Costs Despite Court Warning

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.13.2025 7:00 AM

This Protein Powder Is Made Out of Air and Uses 600 Times Less Water Than Beef

Jeff Luse | From the October 2025 issue

FBI Blunders and Internet Panic: How the Search for Charlie Kirk's Killer Went Off the Rails

Matthew Petti | 9.12.2025 5:14 PM

The Standard for 'Vicious' Speech Trump Laid Out After Kirk's Murder Would Implicate Trump Himself

Jacob Sullum | 9.12.2025 3:45 PM

U.S. Plan To Disarm Hezbollah Is a Diplomatic Dead End

Lora Karch | 9.12.2025 3:31 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300