Government Openness Meeting: Closed to the Media and Public
Openness in government is all well and good, and we are in fact firmly committed to it, but, well, get the hell out of our face, media, the government is having a secret meeting over here! From the Associated Press, which finds that, like many of Obama's promises, his promises of increased government transparency haven't panned out too well:
It's hardly the image of transparency the Obama administration wants to project: A workshop on government openness is closed to the public.
The event Monday for federal employees is a fitting symbol of President Barack Obama's uneven record so far on the Freedom of Information Act, a big part of keeping his campaign promise to make his administration the most transparent ever. As Obama's first year in office ends, the government's actions when the public and press seek information are not yet matching up with the president's words.
"The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails," Obama told government offices on his first full day as president…..
Yet on some important issues, his administration produced information only after government watchdogs and reporters spent weeks or months pressing, in some cases suing.
Those include what cars people were buying using the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program (it turned out the most frequent trades involved pickups for pickups with only slightly better gas mileage); how many times airplanes have collided with birds (a lot); whether lobbyists and donors meet with the Obama White House (they do); rules about the interrogation of terror suspects (the FBI and CIA disagreed over what was permitted); and who was speaking in private with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (he has close relationships with a cadre of Wall Street executives whose multibillion-dollar companies survived the economic crisis with his help)….
The San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties group, said it filed 45 requests for records since Obama became president, and that agencies such as NASA and the Energy Department have been mostly cooperative in the spirit of Obama's promises. But the FBI and Justice Department? Not so much….
The closed conference will provide tips for FOIA public liaisons on communicating and negotiating with people who make requests, and introduce the new Office of Government Information Services to them, said Melanie Ann Pustay, director of the Justice Department's Office of Information Policy….
Pustay said she planned to say the same things at the private workshop that she would say publicly. She offered these reasons to explain why it was closed: She wanted government employees to be able to speak candidly, and the conference would be in an auditorium at the Commerce Department, where she said a government ID was required to be admitted. The AP and other news organizations routinely enter government buildings to cover the government.
[Hat tip: Reader Paul from Seattle]
UPDATE: …and this had already been covered on Hit and Run yesterday.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
LOL, so much for openness! Thats just too funny. When are the Sheeple (thats us) gonna finally say enough!
RT
http://www.be-anonymous.bg.tc
LOL, do you ever think that one day the SHeeple will say Enough?
RT
http://www.be-invisible.ua.tc
Is there any record - transcript, audio, whatever - of this "open and transparent government" meeting?
If so, can we get it via FoIA?
The fucking meeting is about FOIA process. Fuck me.
That the chanting hordes still support The Hopester makes me want to vomit, then piss in the vomit.
Yep... we're boned.
"We'll tell you what you need to know."
What a lying POS.
The difference between Obama and Osama:
One is trying to destroy America, the other is succeeding.
You little people are just never satisfied.
Oh boy do I really want joe around to beat down right now. I'd almost feel guilty because of how easy it would be. Almost.
Epi, haven't some Hit'n'Runners spotted him posting on other sites lately? It might be worth tracking him down, the coward.
What happens in the White House, stays in the White House...
+1
joe isn't worth tracking down (though supposedly he does hang out at Unqualified Offerings); if he grows the balls to take his beating, he knows where we are.
joe isn't worth tracking down...
Yeah, it's a bit like chasing a turd down a waterpipe.
It might be worth tracking him down, the coward.
Don't bring that useless fuck back here; abuse him in situ.
Please?
Joe posts on http://highclearing.com/
"Posts" should be "comments". Sorry
It's a mistake to think that joe wouldn't have a hacktastic justification for this.
Well, we DO have Tony, Chad, and other liberal ball-lickers, and they love to give their hacktastic justifications, so maybe we don't need joe after all.
Sure, he'd have a justification; and we would laugh and laugh and laugh. joe's not really very self-aware, to our entertainment benefit.
Okay.
this administration is turning into an episode of "Yes Minister"...
"He wants to be open, but the laws passed in the Bush administration won't let him. Also, deregulation!"
So all you "libertarians" who voted for Obama, have any spare Change for a cup of Hope?
Hope in one hand... shit in the other... see which one fills up first.
"So all you "libertarians" who voted for Obama, have any spare Change for a cup of Hope?"
Excuse me, that is Hope(R) and Change(TM). I do not believe you have obtained the necessary licensing verification to use those words freely if you are not a yammering supportive voter of That Great Hopester, Barack Obama.
You may apply for your free speech conditional usage permit, and upon e-verification of such permit, you may or may not be granted use of said terminology. Your prompt service is guaranteed.*
*Not a guarantee.
Fuck that. I'm (still) a free man, and this is (for now) a free country. I'll speak about Fearless Leader however I please.
Furthermore, I - hey, there's someone pounding on my doo