Thanks to Google Earth, We're All Big Brother Now
Who needs spy satellites when you've got the Internet? Tech Crunch reports on an entrprenuerial blogger who recently used Google Earth to pinpoint the exact location of a CIA missile strike in Pakistan:
The leader of Pakistan's Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud, may or may not be dead after a CIA missile hits his father-in-law's home in the remote "Zangarha area" of the country. But now we can see exactly where that missile hit, and we don't even need access to a spy satellite. Thanks to Google Earth, we get the image above.
Stefan Geens pinpointed the location on his blog Ogle Earth using location information gathered from news accounts. He also figured out where the supposed burial ground was. A decade ago, only a handful of people would have had access to such satellite imagery. Today, anyone can download it for free. CIA and military satellites are still higher resolution, but it makes you wonder how fast the geo-information gap between governments and citizens is closing.
The last question is important: As Google Earth (or some other web-based satellite-viewing technology) evolves into a sort of Internet-powered version of Sauron's All Seeing Eye, it's going to make it much more difficult for governments to conceal large-scale action, military or otherwise. Of course, it's also going to cause privacy complications for individuals too. Still, I'm inclined to see it as a good thing: It seems far more likely that it will prove a lot more useful at tracking large-scale government actions than actions by individuals.
In 2004, Reason put aerial shots of its subscribers' homes on the cover, and Declan McCullagh wrote about the way online databases are changing the way we live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
a sort of Internet-powered version of Sauron's All Seeing Eye
Suderman, Suderman, Suderman. You would have been so much cooler if you'd referenced Snow Crash instead of LOTR.
first link no workie.
article
With 6 Billion people having access to this technology, I can't understand why Osama Bin Laden hasn't been found. I am starting to think that his existence has been faked on a bollywood soundstage.
Xeoenes, he probably wasn't born when Snow Crash came out. Go easy on the child.
'In 2004, Reason put aerial shots of its subscribers' homes on the cover, and Declan McCullagh wrote about the way online databases are changing the way we live."
No wonder the revenuers found my combo whiskey still / nudist camp! Fortunately, they fled in disgust, retching at the sight of fat naked drunk people.
I think you meant "Sauron's Flaming Vagina"
Link fixed!
No wonder the revenuers found my combo whiskey still / nudist camp! Fortunately, they fled in disgust, retching at the sight of fat naked drunk people.
Man, that was a crazy weekend.
Xeones, he probably wasn't born when Snow Crash came out.
Meghan fiancee is under 17? Dirty girl.
Add possessives at will.
The last question is important: As Google Earth (or some other web-based satellite-viewing technology) evolves into a sort of Internet-powered version of Sauron's All Seeing Eye, it's going to make it much more difficult for governments to conceal large-scale action, military or otherwise.
That will require web-accessible satellite imagery that is real-time, or at least more recent than years ago. None of the houses in my neighborhood, which is three years old, show on Google Earth.
Still a very, very long way off. Hell, even the government can't get real-time satellite info most of the time; they have to task satellites to do it.
Red light cam bad.
Satellite cam good.
That's so Suderman.
If i recall correctly, the military has an understanding with Google whereby all of the satellite images used by Google cannot be less than 6 months old. Yet you can still look at, say, Bagram AFB in Afghanistan and count the choppers that were there some time in the past.
My cover was incorrect, because in my then-current borough of NYC (Queens), people insert a stupid hyphen between the hundreds and the tens digit of their house number, and it stumped mapping software for years. Maybe OBL lives in Queens.
They got my apartment dead on--I think my car was even out front. After that issue and until I moved, some guy in a leather jacket started hanging out in the woods behind the apartment. Probably just a coincidence.
Someone either doesn't understand Google Earth or Sauron's eye.
Sauron's eye watched in real-time. Google Earth doesn't. It's updated how often?
Frodo's task might have been easier if Sauron only received yearly updates of what was happening.
Still, I'm inclined to see it as a good thing: It seems far more likely that it will prove a lot more useful at tracking large-scale government actions than actions by individuals.
I'm a tinfoil hat wearer in this department. I think the Key Hole and whatever other programs they have running are probably the same distance away from current tech as it has been in the past. The move to unmaned aerial technology is pretty interesting as well. I wonder how far unmaned bottom of the LEO scale aircraft are used for surveillance.
some guy in a leather jacket started hanging out in the woods behind the apartment. Probably just a coincidence.
Winner.
RC Dean
The bandwidth issues are still beyond the capability of even governments. Steering satellites is expensive too. hard to refuel on orbit... Plus the orbital mechanics issues mean that long dwell UAV's are much better at streaming video - the bird is only overhead for a few minutes.
"""Still a very, very long way off. Hell, even the government can't get real-time satellite info most of the time; they have to task satellites to do it."""
Yeah. But they can task a sat to fly over a given location frequently and use time lapse photography to view events over time. I suppose they could have, or could get enough sats to cover the globe once a day. But that's not real-time surveilance.
They are also working on space based radar to have a more realtime radar view of the world. Not the same as real time photo surveilance of the globe though.
The cover story for the latest Popular Science is on drone aircraft. As SugarFree, I believe, pointed out last week, is there any doubt that drone aircraft are going to be our undoing? Sure, they're piloted remotely now.
Anyway, the Predator can fly over a target for 24 hours, the Reaper for 16. Given that the military probably holds back on actual capabilities, I imagine they can hold positions for even longer, or other drones can if they can't. One thought about remotely piloting drones--can't the drone, in theory, be hacked?
Private sector versions of the same thing could be used for traffic control, weather. . .screw it, who am I kidding? They would be used to track celebrity movements, day in, day out.
Think small blimp with a camera.
Armed? I'm not impressed unless the blimp is armed.
Yeah. But they can task a sat to fly over a given location frequently and use time lapse photography to view events over time. I suppose they could have, or could get enough sats to cover the globe once a day. But that's not real-time surveilance.
There is usually a possibility of time coincident coverage - but the difficulty in scheduling it is enormous. It's used for very high priority events, and usually not more than a few targets at a time can be covered this way. The whole globe would take years and years to cover at any meaningful resolution - and most of it would be junk pictures with no value. they just don't task the birds that way.
Pro Lib
The drones cant be hacked, at least not feasibly - the links are encrypted by the best in the business, and the hardware is itself beyond the capabilities of all but a few governments.
I just watched Eagle Eye (thanks a lot insomnia) and it features a Predator drone gone rogue. Still remote controlled, but not by a human.
domo,
The drones cant be hacked, at least not feasibly
The joke was about them becoming sentient and controlling themselves. Like that shitty Jessica Beil movie.
The drones cant be hacked, at least not feasibly
Hah! There is nothing that can't be hacked by a geeky yet muscular guy and his flirty yet demure yet busty sidekick, peering at computer screens and furiously typing. Hollywood wouldn't lie!
didn't see it - guess Pro Lib makes funnies over my head.
One thought about remotely piloting drones--can't the drone, in theory, be hacked?
In Grisham's The Broker a couple of Pakis find a high-resolution sat camera network and figure out how to aim it, but they don't know who created it. I'm guessing he's going for the plausible deniability angle. (I'm not sure how that's related to the main story arc yet -- I've been reading it for a few weeks, but I'm only to page 60 or so because I read it in the can.)
"""The whole globe would take years and years to cover at any meaningful resolution """
How long did it take Google? Meaningful resolution is not determined by how fast the sat flys, but by the quality of the camera. Even if the gov has enough sats to cover the earth in a day, a daily photo is of limited intel use.
The example I saw was the location of an Iranian nuclear facility, which goes to your point of being high priorty. It was a time lapse of the construction, it was pretty damn amazing. This was from Wired TV a few years ago, some guy was demostrating the PC Table using what he called a more fancy government version of Google Earth. It looked like Google Earth, but not sure it really was.
Others have already said this more-or-less, but Google Earth is NOT real-time. Google Earth is mosaic-based software that uses long-lat coordinates and satellite images (which are 2-3 years old) to mesh them together. Images in one part of the Earth can be taken in a different year. The military/government will not allow newer images to be used for this purpose.
domoarrigato,
The drones are human controlled for the time being, but I'm sure AI-controlled drones will come. Along with Armageddon. [Screams silently.]
I'm sure the communications between Nevada and the drones are heavily encrypted, but encryption is a constant battle, and mistakes get made, anyway.
"In 2004, Reason put aerial shots of its subscribers' homes on the cover..."
That still stands, in my mind, as the most daring magazine cover of all time. Once I recognized my own neighborhood in the picture, it just completely freaked me out.
"In 2004, Reason put aerial shots of its subscribers' homes on the cover"
Agreed, dugonearth. It actually missed my house by to lots, but since there are no physical structures around me, I was still impressed.
Idea: Once Google's Street Imaging gets to 90% of America or so, reason should put your housefront on the magazine cover.
Reason had a picture of my old house on it, but I had moved fairly recently. And wasn't the point of the covers more a tribute to variable printing than a surveylance warning?
Google van caught my boy walking home from school. It is fun "driving" around and trying to figure out when the van came by.
Not real time; too right. Both the satellite and street view of my house were at least two years old. When we had big pine trees (we miss them but the place actually looks better now).
A year or two ago, somebody was taking pictures of the entire California coast and putting them on the internet. Barbara Striesand sued because her house was in one photo. Here's the link: http://www.californiacoastline.org/
Barbara Striesand sued because her nose was in one photo.
Don't laugh at me, but I honestly read it that way the first time through. I thought it was a South Park joke.
These pictures are not in real time are they??
Thanks for the post
Otomasyon Sistemleri
H?z Kontrol Sistemleri
Thanks for the useful tip
Thanks for the useful tip
With many new announcement about the wizard of oz movies in the news, you might want to consider starting to obtain Wizard of Oz book series either as collectible or investment at RareOzBooks.com.