Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Obama Whiffs on Transparency

Radley Balko | 4.27.2009 8:48 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

So remember Obama's promise to post bills to the Internet, and wait five days for public review before signing them?

So far, he's one for 11.

And the one is questionable.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Holder Visits Tower of London, Talks About 21st-Century Torture

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

PoliticsTransparency
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (27)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Warren   16 years ago

    ...
    And the men who spurred us on,
    sit in judgment of all wrong.
    They decide and the shotgun sings the song!

  2. Xeones   16 years ago

    Yo, Obama sucks.

  3. Warty   16 years ago

    Obama is worse than I could have possibly imagined, and it's hilarious.

  4. P Brooks   16 years ago

    "There's no time to think!"

  5. Telly   16 years ago

    You mean Obama lied?? He's full of shit??!!

    Omg, I can't believe it.

  6. Alan Vanneman   16 years ago

    Well, one out of eleven, no, wait, that sucks. Let's change the subject.

  7. P Brooks   16 years ago

    Those other ten really didn't have a material effect on anything. So they don't count.

  8. cm   16 years ago

    "I believe it is not in our character, American character, to follow -- but to lead. And it is time for us to lead once again. I am here today to set this goal: we will devote more than 3 percent of our GDP to research and development," Obama said.

    Jeeeeeeeeez. Obama's a douche.

  9. EJ   16 years ago

    I can't believe it's not change!

  10. sixstring   16 years ago

    Wow! He can't even get past the Mendoza Line.

  11. crimethink   16 years ago

    At this point, Obama breaking a campaign promise is like another 100 people dying in a Baghdad suicide bombing was two years ago. ie, something that really should make one outraged but the relevant nerve endings have been fried by overstimulation.

  12. not the real jb   16 years ago

    You guys all just misunderstand Him.

    He's just shifting from "campaigning mode" to "governance mode."

    That's change we can all believe in!

  13. Medic   16 years ago

    Still no holding my breath. He's nothing but a Douche bag.

  14. Invisible Finger   16 years ago

    Post no bills

  15. J sub D   16 years ago

    Damn you Warren!

    I dunno, but I expect there has been a spike in Who's Next sales since Mr. Hope and Change got elected.

  16. H   16 years ago

    Query: did candidate Obama promise to wait until 5 days after final bill language becomes publicly available, after it's posted on the White House website, after Congressional passage, or after formal presentment? For example, the final stimulus bill language was put online on Feb. 12, & the bill passed on Feb. 13, but it was formally presented only on Feb. 16. So did the President sign the bill (on Feb. 17) after 5 days, 4 days, or 1 day? Campaign promises aside, it may make a difference from the point of view of transparency.

    (I take it no one accepts the charge made by House Republicans in connection with the stimulus bill that Obama had already broken his promise by Feb. 11, before Congress passed it, because the language agreed to in the conference committee wasn't already posted at that point on the White House website.)

  17. Anonymous   16 years ago

    Transparently an idiot.

    Promises? Delivered!

  18. R C Dean   16 years ago

    Well, H, according to CATO:

    "As president," his campaign website said, "Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days."

    I would say that means he's supposed to wait for five days after its posted on the White House website.

    Finally, of course, note the Parsin' President's escape hatch (there's always an escape hatch): this promise applies only to "non-emergency bills."

  19. PR   16 years ago

    overpromise. underdeliver

  20. Vogon   16 years ago

    I would say that means he's supposed to wait for five days after its posted on the White House website.

    The plans have been on display in your local planning office in Alpha Centauri for 50 of your Earth years, so you've had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaints, and it's far too late to start making a fuss about it now!

  21. Silentz   16 years ago

    H,
    If you have have to give him an 'out' on a technicality, then his transparency promise, like many of his other 'promises', is essentially worthless.

  22. jtuf   16 years ago

    lol, Vogon. How true.

  23. No Name Guy   16 years ago

    Obama is a politican.

    Politicians are habitual liars.

    Ergo Obama is a lying sack.

    What's so hard to understand?

  24. crimethink   16 years ago

    This is terrible, but to be expected. Obama's gone back on hundreds of campaign promises already, yet the electoral herd continues to support him.

    To expect him to keep any promises at this point is like expecting your dog to wait to go outside when you've been giving him doggie treats after he poops on the living room carpet.

  25. engineer   16 years ago

    "So remember Obama's promise to post bills to the Internet, and wait five days for public review before signing them?"

    It's a stupid idea anyway, and a sign of weak-willed pansy with no principles. You either sign the bill, because it is morally and practically right, or you veto the sucker and tell Congress that you're not going to apply your signature to a steaming pile of cow turds. None of this "rule by polls" crap.

  26. engineer   16 years ago

    God knows only hardcore political junkies have time to sort threw the mound of crud that Congress piles into each bill.

  27. P Brooks   16 years ago

    None of this "rule by polls" crap.

    You're not from around here, are you?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Judge Orders Tufts Grad Student Rumeysa Ozturk Be Released on Bail From Immigration Detention

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.9.2025 3:17 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!