Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

This Is What You Get When You Mess With U.S. Populism

Matt Welch | 3.20.2009 11:55 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Just because it was totally predictable, doesn't make it any less outrageous: The man who campaigned daily against trade agreements and outsourcing has sparked an utterly pointless trade war with Mexico.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A Forgotten Civil Rights Hero

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsEconomicsWar on DrugsWorldBarack ObamaMexicoFree TradeGlobalization
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. ClubMedSux   17 years ago

    So I guess Goolsbee was lying when he told the Canadians that Obama's anti-free trade rhetoric was simply "political positioning"? Fuck.

    Of course, Goolsbee later clarified (per the AP): "Obama is not a protectionist, but that the Illinois senator tries to strike a balance between the economic struggles of working Americans and recognizing that free trade is good for the economy."

    Why can't people realize that doing what is good for the economy is the ONLY way to provide relief to working Americans, and that if any balancing is indeed going on, it's balancing what's best for the economy (and, by extension, working Americans) against what's best for Barack's political career?

  2. Warren   17 years ago

    doom
    DoooM
    DOOOOM

  3. Cool Cal   17 years ago

    So Between this, the trade war between us and the Chinese because of carbon rationing, and whatever other blowback happens with any other non WTO countries from the whole "Buy American" provision in the Stimulus, which I believe is still in effect (I could be mistaken), it's pretty much de facto Smoot Hawley, round two. Fantastic.

  4. JS   17 years ago

    For "economic struggles of working Americans," read, "greed of union thugs."

    http://www.economist.com/world/americas/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13331117

  5. Orange Line Special   17 years ago

    This post is pretty funny.

    Obama admitted being deceptive about NAFTA. He also "sent a message" that he supports Bush's secretive SPP.gov. And, he certainly seems to have confirmed the existence of a certain "highway" and also said that the CFR is just a "forum".

    See also 1993's WHY THE PRO-NAFTA HYSTERIA?

  6. SugarFree   17 years ago

    Someone kick the end table, the broken record is skipping again.

  7. meerdahl   17 years ago

    Hope and change!

  8. JW   17 years ago

    Shut the fuck up OLS.

  9. EJM   17 years ago

    Don't forget the roles that Pelosi, DeFazio, and (especially) Dorgan have themselves played in all of this (more here, here, and [to a lesser extent] here).

  10. Bumpers   17 years ago

    " it's pretty much de facto Smoot Hawley, round two. Fantastic."

    BRUSSELS (AP) - The European Union slapped import fees on U.S. biodiesel Thursday, saying it had to protect European producers from unfair American subsidies and below-cost selling.

    The EU fees will affect biodiesel sold by Archer Daniels Midland Co., Cargill Inc. and several others to Europe, the world's biggest user and producer of crop-based fuels.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gvd4T17WeuvcomzXpJ_EaMi7RaLwD96SI9780

  11. R C Dean   17 years ago

    Goolsbee, translated:

    "Obama is not a balls to the wall protectionist who will enact broad tariffs and trade restrictions, but that the Illinois senator tries to strike a balance between the economic struggles of working Americans and recognizing that free trade is good for the economy enact restrictions that will benefit his political friends and supporters and advance his political career."

    Color me unimpressed.

  12. Al S.   17 years ago

    Why weren't Reason writers railing against the stupid cocksucker named Obama BEFORE the fucking election? The occasional rant against Obama during the campaign was always tempered with infantilizing We-hope-he'll-see-the-light-when-he-gets-in-office rhetoric.

  13. jtuf   17 years ago

    Obama lost my admiration the day he went on that protectionist rant in Ohio. My internet access was a bit limited then. I backed Barr, but only mildly, because I wished Barr would support lifting immigration quotas.

  14. jtuf   17 years ago

    First Obama upsets the UK. Now he's started a trade war with Mexico. For years, America has been the hub of a circle of allied countries. I hope our allies are ready to reach out directly to each other, because American leadership is declining.

  15. Anonymous   17 years ago

    Calling Leftists protectionist? Isn't that racist?

  16. EJM   17 years ago

    I backed Barr, but only mildly, because I wished Barr would support lifting immigration quotas.

    I ended up not voting (for various reasons), but if I had pulled the metaphorical lever for McCain instead of for Barr, it would have been largely because of their stances on immigration; or, to put it another way, Daddy Yankee's endorsement did (indirectly) have an influence on me.

  17. jtuf   17 years ago

    The Wall Street Journal wrote an recent update. The US is reconsidering the trucking ban, because Mexico's retaliatory tarrifs. I glad that it looks like we'll go back to free trade. I'm concerned at how the negotiations went. Instead of just respecting the general principle of free trade, Obama hurt ties with Mexico for political gain. Then he backed down once it looked like Mexico would put up a fight. If that is how Obama conducts foreign policy, what rational negotiator wouldn't play hardball with us? Sigh, I fear Obama's foreign policiy might amaze us by making Bush look diplomatic in comparison.

  18. MORE ANONYMOUS THAN ANYONE   17 years ago

    Eat warm shit Lonewacko

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

New York Doubles Down on Delivery Wage Disaster

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 10.11.2025 7:00 AM

California's Fast Food Minimum Wage Hike Cost the State 18,000 Jobs. That Shouldn't Surprise Anyone.

Peter Suderman | From the November 2025 issue

Video Shows Federal Agents Arresting a Chicago Journalist. They Now Say She Threw Objects at Their Vehicle.

C.J. Ciaramella | 10.10.2025 5:20 PM

This Indiana City Doesn't Have To Pay an Innocent Mom $16,000 After Police Wrecked Her Home, Court Rules

Billy Binion | 10.10.2025 5:05 PM

Trump Won't Invoke the Insurrection Act—As Long As He Can Use the National Guard However He Wants

Jacob Sullum | 10.10.2025 4:55 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300