Encyclopedic Libertarianism
In the December/January issue of the American Spectator, reason contributor Jeremy Lott reviews the Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. He wonders why such an encyclopedia avoids giving an authoritiative definition of the very term to which it is devoted, and accurately notes many of the tensions inherent in an intellectual movement that manages, with varying degrees of comfort, to encompass both Adam Smith-style classical liberals and Murray Rothbardian anarchist radicals.
For much, much more on the topic, consult my own narrative take on libertarianism's history, Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What, do I have to do Lefiti's job for him?
You're all fucktards, fundamentalists, wingnuts, etc.
oh man nice donderoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo comment on the amspec webpage.
"Authoritative" and "Libertarianism" are surely incompatible.
I respect Doherty in this case for not imposing his own ultra-minimal definition of libertarianism.