Fighting for Free Minds and Free Markets, 24/7 (and for 40 More Years!)
For 40 years, without ever missing a deadline, reason has printed a monthly magazine, which you can subscribe to for the low low price of $19.97 a year. But if you've read this far you surely know that we publish thousands upon thousands of words online each day, on the award-winning Hit & Run blog and main site, reacting to and delving underneath the news of the week, day, hour, and minute.
As you reach down into your pockets and contemplate just what kind of generous, tax-deductible contribution you're willing to give in support of journalism that advances Free Minds and (what's left of) Free Markets, here's a quick rundown of online pieces we've run this week alone pertaining to the financial crunch and proposed $700 billion bailout of Wall Street:
"Hank Paulson's Countdown to Armageddon: How the Chicken Little treasurer is nationalizing the U.S. economy," by Tim Cavanaugh.
"The Great Bailout Brouhaha: Free market economists weigh in on Paulson's plan," featuring Bryan Caplan, Robert E. Wright, Jeffrey A. Miron, Chris Dillow, Frederic Sautet, Mark Thornton, Yves Smith, Robert Higgs, Mike Munger, and Alex Tabarrok.
"Five Questions About the Short-Selling Ban: The government's only answer: Shut up, we're in charge!", by Brian Doherty.
"No More Bailouts! Congress should unleash the private sector to address the current financial meltdown," by Anthony Randazzo.
"Bailout Bums: Libertarian-minded Republicans are caught with their pants down as Wall Street panics the Capital City," by David Weigel.
"The Case Against the Bailout: Why the government shouldn't save businesses from their bad choices," by Steve Chapman.
"Corporatism, Not Capitalism: The free market has nothing to do with the current crisis," by Radley Balko
Meanwhile, we've been preparing the December issue of the magazine, which you can bet will be filled with explanatory journalism about what we face in the economy, the capital markets, and Washington, and how the three entities do not necessarily mean the same thing.
Please consider donating today to support our journalism; click here to read about all the cool swag you'll get.
And here's me one more time making the case for our approach towards the news:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Has anyone else noticed -- now that he's in no danger of getting elected President -- just how much media attention Ron Paul has been getting? (I find his restraint amazing, I'd have shouted "I told you so!" half a dozen times by now, but Paul's so goddamn polite Cavuto just had to do it FOR him!)
I made a donation, because you're worth it, but I was torn because I don't want to encourage pop-up fundraising...
I dont mind donating to the reason foundation but I wont do it until they get rid of Steve Chapman
Hey, Reason. Are you guys going broke? I don't mind fund raising but this is getting so obsessive of late that I'm wondering if you are about to fold up your tent.