Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Freddie Mac the Freeloader

Nick Gillespie | 9.9.2008 8:46 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Regarding the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government-backed mortgage colossi, whose bailout could cost $200 billion:

"Doesn't this make the case for privatization, and powerfully at that? Don't forget that we are also sitting here with Social Security and Medicare leaving taxpayers on the hook for more than $50 trillion in liabilities."

That's James Pethokoukis, economics columnist of U.S. News & World Report, quoted by reason contributor and Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi, who asks when will the government gravy stop being poured?

Airlines already have benefited from the largesse. Detroit's auto industry, it has been reported, hopes to secure $50 billion in additional federal loans to, you know, help out.

Well, because the Big Three built cars no one wanted, failed to embrace new technologies, offered sweetheart deals to executives, and surrendered to predatory union demands … naturally, they deserve a cushy government loan. (I only hope newspapers are afforded such compassionate treatment. We're a national treasure, after all.)…

Isn't it ironic that government bars a citizen from risking his own Social Security funds because it's too chancy yet uses your money to bail out companies that have engaged in the very behavior government supposedly is safeguarding us from?

And really, what's riskier than letting Washington handle your money?

More here.

Jeff Taylor on FMFM here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cooking Show Ousts Thai Leader

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsPolicyCorporate WelfareGovernment Spending
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Episiarch   17 years ago

    And the shark, he has teeth
    And he wears them in his face
    And Macheath, he has a knife
    But the knife one doesn't see

  2. Lost_In_Translation   17 years ago

    And really, what's riskier than letting Washington handle your money?

    Witholding the protection money from the IRS?

  3. JMR   17 years ago

    The part I love is the failed executives'

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122079276849707821.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

    "exit package." I can think of a number of business disasters JMR could perpetrate on the taxpayers, but the idea of this kind of compensation for my hypothetical disaster blows even MY greedy mind.

  4. ed   17 years ago

    I, too, am a national treasure, but I don't need no $200 billion. A million will suffice. I really am too precious to fail. Thank you all, and God Bless America!?.

  5. Reinmoose   17 years ago

    ed -
    don't be foolish. Everyone knows that our children are the ones who are too precious to fail. No Child shall be Left Behind!

  6. bigbigslacker   17 years ago

    Speaking of freeloading, I used to use Steganos internet anonymity software and it worked great (really - not part of the joke. Steganos.com). I heard about this Ultimate Anonymity software, but word on the street is it really sucks, and its sales are mostly through spamming. It would be really cool if I could find a link for both...

  7. Episiarch   17 years ago

    I heard about this Ultimate Anonymity software

    LOL McSame bullshit monkey shines that really is too much shoot me now.

  8. ed   17 years ago

    No Child shall be Left Behind!

    Not even the "special needs" children? Won't they slow down the "no particular needs" children?

  9. ed   17 years ago

    Wait, I think we're on to something here. Freddie and Fannie are "special needs" corporations. Washington could have aborted them, but God said every corporation is Special. I suggest they merge Fannie and Freddie into one and call it Trig.

  10. Kant feel Pietzsche, my Balzac   17 years ago

    Epi, too tired to look up the actual lyrics?

  11. Kant feel Pietzsche, my Balzac   17 years ago

    Oh the shark has
    pretty teeth, dear
    and he shows them
    pearly white.
    Just a jacknife
    has McHeath, dear
    and he keeps it
    out of sight.

  12. Episiarch   17 years ago

    My lyrics are the direct German translation, Kant.

  13. J sub D   17 years ago

    Isn't it ironic that government bars a citizen from risking his own Social Security funds because it's too chancy yet uses your money to bail out companies that have engaged in the very behavior government supposedly is safeguarding us from?

    QFT. I'm a resident of Motown and I deplore any bailout of the big 2.5. Of course both of the daily rags (one allegedly conservative) support it. I'll bet dollars to donuts that it happens though.

  14. J sub D   17 years ago

    The part I love is the failed executives'"exit package."

    Anything more than a boot in the ass to speed them on their way is ridiculous.

  15. CFisher   17 years ago

    Regarding the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government-backed mortgage colossi, whose bailout could cost $200 billion

    I think the Rule of 10 should apply here. Any government estimate regarding a program or action's cost should be multiplied by a factor of 10 to get closer to the real cost of the program or action.

  16. jj   17 years ago

    "Not even the "special needs" children? Won't they slow down the "no particular needs" children?"

    Of course they will. But they're all working in government; slowing down the rest of us is what they're paid to do.

  17. JMR   17 years ago

    And note: Obama has figured it out.

    http://news.yahoo.com/story//ap/20080909/ap_on_el_pr/obama_mortgage_giants

    I expect McCain to ape this stand shortly...

  18. Matthew   17 years ago

    Oh der Haifisch,
    Der hat Zaehne,
    Umm ..umm..hmm

    Yeah, I forget the rest.

    Lotte Lenya everyone!

  19. R C Dean   17 years ago

    I suggest they merge Fannie and Freddie into one and call it Trig.

    The Total Re-Insurance Guaranty Corp.?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Broad Ruling Against Trump's Immigration Policies Illustrates Alternatives to Universal Injunctions

Jacob Sullum | 7.3.2025 4:40 PM

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Federal Prison Guards Allegedly Beat an Inmate to a Pulp. The Supreme Court Says He Can't Sue.

Billy Binion | 7.3.2025 2:48 PM

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia

Peter Suderman | 7.3.2025 1:40 PM

The $4 Trillion 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Breaks the Bank and Violates Congress' Own Budget Rules

Veronique de Rugy | 7.3.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!