Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

Freddie Mac the Freeloader

Nick Gillespie | 9.9.2008 8:46 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Regarding the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government-backed mortgage colossi, whose bailout could cost $200 billion:

"Doesn't this make the case for privatization, and powerfully at that? Don't forget that we are also sitting here with Social Security and Medicare leaving taxpayers on the hook for more than $50 trillion in liabilities."

That's James Pethokoukis, economics columnist of U.S. News & World Report, quoted by reason contributor and Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi, who asks when will the government gravy stop being poured?

Airlines already have benefited from the largesse. Detroit's auto industry, it has been reported, hopes to secure $50 billion in additional federal loans to, you know, help out.

Well, because the Big Three built cars no one wanted, failed to embrace new technologies, offered sweetheart deals to executives, and surrendered to predatory union demands … naturally, they deserve a cushy government loan. (I only hope newspapers are afforded such compassionate treatment. We're a national treasure, after all.)…

Isn't it ironic that government bars a citizen from risking his own Social Security funds because it's too chancy yet uses your money to bail out companies that have engaged in the very behavior government supposedly is safeguarding us from?

And really, what's riskier than letting Washington handle your money?

More here.

Jeff Taylor on FMFM here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cooking Show Ousts Thai Leader

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsPolicyCorporate WelfareGovernment Spending
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Episiarch   18 years ago

    And the shark, he has teeth
    And he wears them in his face
    And Macheath, he has a knife
    But the knife one doesn't see

  2. Lost_In_Translation   18 years ago

    And really, what's riskier than letting Washington handle your money?

    Witholding the protection money from the IRS?

  3. JMR   18 years ago

    The part I love is the failed executives'

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122079276849707821.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

    "exit package." I can think of a number of business disasters JMR could perpetrate on the taxpayers, but the idea of this kind of compensation for my hypothetical disaster blows even MY greedy mind.

  4. ed   18 years ago

    I, too, am a national treasure, but I don't need no $200 billion. A million will suffice. I really am too precious to fail. Thank you all, and God Bless America!?.

  5. Reinmoose   18 years ago

    ed -
    don't be foolish. Everyone knows that our children are the ones who are too precious to fail. No Child shall be Left Behind!

  6. bigbigslacker   18 years ago

    Speaking of freeloading, I used to use Steganos internet anonymity software and it worked great (really - not part of the joke. Steganos.com). I heard about this Ultimate Anonymity software, but word on the street is it really sucks, and its sales are mostly through spamming. It would be really cool if I could find a link for both...

  7. Episiarch   18 years ago

    I heard about this Ultimate Anonymity software

    LOL McSame bullshit monkey shines that really is too much shoot me now.

  8. ed   18 years ago

    No Child shall be Left Behind!

    Not even the "special needs" children? Won't they slow down the "no particular needs" children?

  9. ed   18 years ago

    Wait, I think we're on to something here. Freddie and Fannie are "special needs" corporations. Washington could have aborted them, but God said every corporation is Special. I suggest they merge Fannie and Freddie into one and call it Trig.

  10. Kant feel Pietzsche, my Balzac   18 years ago

    Epi, too tired to look up the actual lyrics?

  11. Kant feel Pietzsche, my Balzac   18 years ago

    Oh the shark has
    pretty teeth, dear
    and he shows them
    pearly white.
    Just a jacknife
    has McHeath, dear
    and he keeps it
    out of sight.

  12. Episiarch   18 years ago

    My lyrics are the direct German translation, Kant.

  13. J sub D   18 years ago

    Isn't it ironic that government bars a citizen from risking his own Social Security funds because it's too chancy yet uses your money to bail out companies that have engaged in the very behavior government supposedly is safeguarding us from?

    QFT. I'm a resident of Motown and I deplore any bailout of the big 2.5. Of course both of the daily rags (one allegedly conservative) support it. I'll bet dollars to donuts that it happens though.

  14. J sub D   18 years ago

    The part I love is the failed executives'"exit package."

    Anything more than a boot in the ass to speed them on their way is ridiculous.

  15. CFisher   18 years ago

    Regarding the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government-backed mortgage colossi, whose bailout could cost $200 billion

    I think the Rule of 10 should apply here. Any government estimate regarding a program or action's cost should be multiplied by a factor of 10 to get closer to the real cost of the program or action.

  16. jj   18 years ago

    "Not even the "special needs" children? Won't they slow down the "no particular needs" children?"

    Of course they will. But they're all working in government; slowing down the rest of us is what they're paid to do.

  17. JMR   18 years ago

    And note: Obama has figured it out.

    http://news.yahoo.com/story//ap/20080909/ap_on_el_pr/obama_mortgage_giants

    I expect McCain to ape this stand shortly...

  18. Matthew   18 years ago

    Oh der Haifisch,
    Der hat Zaehne,
    Umm ..umm..hmm

    Yeah, I forget the rest.

    Lotte Lenya everyone!

  19. R C Dean   18 years ago

    I suggest they merge Fannie and Freddie into one and call it Trig.

    The Total Re-Insurance Guaranty Corp.?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks