Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

The Road to Damascus

Radley Balko | 9.2.2008 4:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Onion summarizes "Bob Barr on the issues."

(1995–2007) Trying to control the faith, sexuality, reproduction, drug use, and national allegiance of every single American.

(2007–) Aw, Fuck it.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ron Paul's Rally: Kirchick Bait

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

PoliticsBob Barr
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jaybird   17 years ago

    And yet I'd still prefer him over the other two.

  2. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    Seems like a good campaign slogan to me. In fact, all of the campaigns should use the F-word:

    * LP - Aw, Fuck it.
    * GOP - America, Fuck Yeah!
    * Democrats - Fuck America!
    * Greens - Fuck a Sheep. With a Cucumber.

  3. Episiarch   17 years ago

    * LP - Aw, Fuck it.
    * GOP - America, Fuck Yeah!
    * Democrats - Fuck America!
    * Greens - Fuck a Sheep. With a Cucumber.

    * Nader - Fuck you!

  4. anonymous coward   17 years ago

    "And yet I'd still prefer him over the other two."

    The worst libertarian is still better than any other alternatives. This suggests to me that we are either enlightened sages, or cranks.

  5. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    Yes, nice addition. Here's another:

    * Gravel - What the Fuck?

  6. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    anonymous coward,

    Sage cranks. Better yet, Ensaged cranks (pronounced en-sage-ed).

  7. Jennifer   17 years ago

    Succinct and accurate.

  8. SugarFree   17 years ago

    * Greens - Fuck a Sheep. With a Cucumber.

    Actually, more like:

    * Greens - Fuck a Sheep. But don't eat it!

  9. Brandybuck   17 years ago

    I think I found my candidate: Joad Cressbeckler!

  10. libertymike   17 years ago

    Fuckin 'ey!

  11. Episiarch   17 years ago

    But whose slogan is "Fuck me!"?

  12. libertymike   17 years ago

    Paraphrase: In the long run, we are all fucked.

  13. TrickyVic   17 years ago

    """The worst libertarian is still better than any other alternatives. """

    Assuming he's actually one. Which I doubt. Sure people can have a change of heart. Hey back in 1995 who would have thought the republicans would be the first to have a pregnant teen in the Whitehouse.

  14. TrickyVic   17 years ago

    """Paraphrase: In the long run, we are all fucked."""

    Yeah, but the we excludes them.

  15. svf   17 years ago

    But whose slogan is "Fuck me!"?

    Sonny Landham...?

  16. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    who would have thought the republicans would be the first to have a pregnant teen in the Whitehouse[?]

    TrickyVic,

    Are you suggesting the McCain is the father?

  17. Pro Lbiertate   17 years ago

    Actually that was supposed to be "that McCain", but perhaps "the McCain" is funnier.

  18. James Anderson Merritt   17 years ago

    Papoon '08: Not Fuckin' Insane!

  19. SugarFree   17 years ago

    The Vice President doesn't live in the White House. He or she lives at Number One Observatory Circle. Unless Palin and the gang decide to move into Cheney's bunker.

  20. Lost_In_Translation   17 years ago

    In New York, fuck is a comma.

  21. libertymike   17 years ago

    Boy, we are a bunch of cynics. Doesn't anybody believe in honest to goodnes conversion? Wasn't the pre-conversion Paul (not Ron) a nasty character who ridiculed Christianity?

  22. John Thacker   17 years ago

    Hey back in 1995 who would have thought the republicans would be the first to have a pregnant teen in the Whitehouse.

    Although certainly Presidents have had children while teenagers before; e.g., Andrew Johnson's firstborn, Martha, was born when he was 19.

    And we certainly can't claim that John Edwards was the first candidate to have a child out of wedlock; others, such as Grover Cleveland, accomplished that.

  23. James Anderson Merritt   17 years ago

    The "no saint like a reformed sinner"="I saw the light" conclusion that we might reach from the Onion's pithy thumbnail assessment would actually be a good campaign message.

    Too bad he doesn't seem to be jumping on it, especially with reference to the failed, endless War on Drugs, progenitor of the current failed, and theoretically endless War on Terror. Who better than Barr to help his former-fellow drug warriors to repudiate their intransigence on this issue up till now?

    If we can't have Papoon and "Not Fuckin' Insane" in '08, can we at least have Barr "Everything You Know (about the WOD) is Fuckin' Wrong"?

  24. Wise Ass   17 years ago

    Alas, how would the libertarian dialogue read without "fuck" and "douche"?

  25. TrickyVic   17 years ago

    """Although certainly Presidents have had children while teenagers before; e.g., Andrew Johnson's firstborn, Martha, was born when he was 19."""

    Not apt. I'm referring to an actually pregnant teen in the Whitehouse, or as sugarfree points out, #1 Observatory circle. Not someone who had a kid as a teen.

    The McCain, is pretty funny and I will hearby address him as such. Kinda like The Kramer.

  26. James Anderson Merritt   17 years ago

    TrickyVic wrote, "The McCain, is pretty funny and I will hearby address him as such. Kinda like The Kramer."

    Or Il Duce.

  27. NAL   17 years ago

    And we certainly can't claim that John Edwards was the first candidate to have a child out of wedlock; others, such as Grover Cleveland, accomplished that.

    On two non-consecutive occasions.
    (Joke stolen from Grampa Simpson)

  28. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    For those not aware of such things, the Naval Observatory digs are much sweeter than the White House. So VP isn't an entirely bad job.

    I guess if The McCain is Bristol Palin's baby daddy, that would explain his VP selection.

  29. R C Dean   17 years ago

    Er, given that Bristol Palin is 5 months pregnant, she should deliver before her mother is sworn in, so she won't be the first pregnant teen in the White House/Naval Observatory, either.

    Unless she gets pregnant again while her mother is in office, of course.

  30. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    If Barr was blinded by the brilliant light of libertarianism on his road to Damascus, does this mean that Jesus is a libertarian? Thought so.

  31. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    R C Dean,

    McCain can do it again. He's a potent force to be reckoned with.

  32. Mad Max   17 years ago

    "Although certainly Presidents have had children while teenagers before; e.g., Andrew Johnson's firstborn, Martha, was born when he was 19."

    Wasn't Johnson married to his wife at the time he and his wife had that baby?

    "Alas, how would the libertarian dialogue read without "fuck" and "douche"?"

    Like a convention of deaf-mutes.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The 9th Circuit Upholds a University of Washington Professor's Right to Mock 'Land Acknowledgments'

Jacob Sullum | 12.22.2025 2:40 PM

DHS Says Recording or Following Law Enforcement 'Sure Sounds Like Obstruction of Justice'

C.J. Ciaramella | 12.22.2025 12:22 PM

A Bipartisan Push to Revive a 1930s Law Could Make Grocery Prices Even Higher

Jack Nicastro | 12.22.2025 11:50 AM

Deplatforming Backfired

Zach Weissmueller | 12.22.2025 11:15 AM

Shein Can't Sell Sex Toys Unless It Checks IDs, French Court Says

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.22.2025 10:33 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks