Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Leftists for Barr

Jesse Walker | 8.25.2008 10:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Radical columnist Alexander Cockburn expresses annoyance at Ralph Nader ("Nader seems to be dropping his bid to the level of knock-about") and embraces another presidential contender:

Face it, if you want to stay true to reason and conscience, the man to vote for is Bob Barr, the Libertarian candidate.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Short Answer, Dave, Is Not a Hell of a Lot

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PoliticsEconomicsThird PartiesBob Barr
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (16)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Franklin Harris   17 years ago

    When a commie like Alexander Cockburn can endorse Barr, despite Barr's weaknesses on social issues, but some LPers go off to form their own Boston Tea Party, something's just wacky. I swear, the Boston Tea Party's is like the LP's version of the PUMAs.

  2. Orange Line Special   17 years ago

    Someone tell me that the comrade is playing a game. Please! Because, I find it difficult to believe that the comrade hasn't figured out just how fake BB is.

  3. SIV   17 years ago

    OT:

    McCain Blogette doesn't have any pics up of the Daddy Yankee endorsement at Cindy's HS Alma Mater. Meghan is slacking off on the campaign.

  4. obi juan   17 years ago

    Fake or not, Barr is on the Colbert Report tomorrow night. Wednesday and Friday mornings on CNN. On Thursday, Glenn Beck will be taping a full hour with Barr.

  5. Rick Barton\'s award winning n   17 years ago

    Cockburn is far better than most Lefties. He actually does some cogent analysis. So it fits that he supports Bob Barr.

  6. kevin   17 years ago

    I can't tell if Barr is sincerely libertarian, but I'll vote for him anyway, as he at least has the decency to pretend to believe in small government.

  7. John C jaxson   17 years ago

    PUMAs are bigots. Boston Tea Partiers left the bigots. Big difference.

  8. James Anderson Merritt   17 years ago

    Maybe I was the only one, but I got a momentary chill from the reference to the "great new book" by Harry Browne in Cockburn's blog. A posthumous publication? Of course it wasn't the (late) Libertarian Harry Browne who was the author of the cited book, but it definitely made me do a double-take. I wonder what Harry would have said about the Bob Barr candidacy.

  9. dpsc   17 years ago

    Cockburn's been making a bid for independence from the doctrinaire left for a while. He's been particularly scathing on the subject of climate change, which is as close to a litmus test for lefties as there is these days.

    Kudos to him for not immediately diving into the extreme right's camp, but...

    Actually, Cockburn would make a good libertarian. He seems driven by principle and immune to common sense (not, by the way, an entirely bad thing in my opinion).

  10. dpsc   17 years ago

    And I guess I have an entirely different definition of PUMA than most people here- to me it means slightly creepy old (that is, a bit younger than me and above) ladies who try to pick me up at nightspots rather than sitting home with their knitting. 'SBlood.. 'Sif...

  11. kwais   17 years ago

    dpsc
    I think those are called 'cougars'

    Same animal I suppose.

  12. Butt-head   17 years ago

    Heh heh, heh heh, Cock burn

  13. Franklin Harris   17 years ago

    I wonder what Harry would have said about the Bob Barr candidacy.

    That depends. The Harry Browne who was a two-time LP presidential nominee or the Harry Browne who said stay out of electoral politics?

  14. val   17 years ago

    dpsc
    I think those are called 'cougars'

    Same animal I suppose.

    it is my understanding that pumas are older then cougars

  15. Nick   17 years ago

    "he at least has the decency to pretend to believe in small government."

    Except that he wants a war on illegal immigrants, which strikes me as a potentially more pointless, abusive and expansive program than the war on drugs.

  16. dpsc   17 years ago

    val: "it is my understanding that pumas are older then cougars"

    Thus scarier. Until you've been cornered by one you won't know what fear is. The jaws that bite, the snapping snatch...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!