Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Et Tu, Agarwalla Brothers?

Mike Riggs | 7.29.2008 3:06 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

In anticipation of getting bent over the witness stand by Hasbro and Mattel, the Agarwalla brothers shut down their most beloved product today:

In a statement, creators Rajat and Jayant Agarwalla said they agreed to block Scrabulous in the United States and Canada in deference to Facebook's concerns, while continuing to pursue their legal defense. Rajat Agarwalla, describing the measures as "unfortunate," declined further comment.

Facebook said the Agarwalla brothers, not the company, made the decision.

Perhaps the Agarwallas are pretending to acquiesce, allowing their fans to rip Hasbro a new one? The Facebook group "Save Scrabbulous" has 46,198 members as of this writing, several hundred of whom have already publicly complained on the group's "wall." 

I wrote about Hasbro's idiocy last week, here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Zora Neale Hurston, Libertarian?

Mike Riggs is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rich Ard   17 years ago

    Not Hasbro's first Scrabble blunder - they've done worse than this in the past and we keep coming back.

    Stefan Fatsis' book "Word Freaks" mixes a decent amount of Scrabble history with stories of people whose existence revolves around the game. Pretty good read.

  2. Occam\'s toothbrush   17 years ago

    The Facebook group "Save Scrabbulous" has 46,198 members as of this writing, several hundred of whom have already publicly complained on the group's "wall."

    That's not a lot of people for a Facebook group. "Starving Dogs is not art" group has 260,435 members, for instance.

    Add that to the fact that joining a group is free and takes roughly five seconds, and writing on the wall not much more.

  3. Hugh Akston   17 years ago

    Occam-

    Don't dismiss it out of hand. Facebook users are a savvy bunch. They don't spend all day sitting around joining hollow groups with no goals or values, capriciously befriending people they've never met, or playing games that waste both time and brainpower.

  4. ed   17 years ago

    Or sending each other virtual gifts.

  5. Occam\'s toothbrush   17 years ago

    I'll be more careful, Hugh.

    As for ed, I'll note that the gifts actually do have some meaning, as you have to pay for those.

  6. Erik   17 years ago

    The rumor is the brother turned down a $10 million offer from Hasbro. They wanted several times that much.

    They get no sympathy from me. They got greedy.

  7. Nick   17 years ago

    The game can still be played at Scrabulous.com. Thanks for giving me a new internet addiction, Reason...Unfortunately I consistently crush the computer robot on the top level so it's no fun anymore...

  8. Pottsy   17 years ago


    They get no sympathy from me. They got greedy.

    I would think that 500,000 daily users with their eyeballs glued to their web browsers for minutes on end is worth a lot more than 10 mil.

  9. prolefeed   17 years ago

    creators Rajat and Jayant Agarwalla said they agreed to block Scrabulous in the United States and Canada

    Because nobody ever links to a website originating in a foreign country, right?

    Wow, the technical workaround to this restriction might take over 5 minutes to write. Teh Hard.

  10. Occam\'s toothbrush   17 years ago

    Pottsy,

    They're not exactly in a position to bargain hard. They're going to lose the lawsuit, guaranteed.

  11. Erik   17 years ago

    I would think that 500,000 daily users with their eyeballs glued to their web browsers for minutes on end is worth a lot more than 10 mil.

    They were on a run rate of $300K/year gross revenue.

    They might be worth 5X revenue. They turned down 33X revenue because it wasn't enough.

    Screw them.

  12. B   17 years ago

    "I wrote about Hasbro's idiocy last week, here."

    When is someone going to write about your idiocy? For christ sake, somebody fire this douche already.

  13. R C Dean   17 years ago

    The rumor is the brother turned down a $10 million offer from Hasbro.

    I assign a credibility discount to this rumor of approximately 98%.

  14. Erik Schwartz   17 years ago

    I assign a credibility discount to this rumor of approximately 98%.

    That's nice. Who are you? What is your opinion based on?

    I built Yahoo!'s gaming site back in the 1990s, my contacts in the casual gaming business are quite solid.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

That Time the FBI Conspired To Get George Foreman an Award for Boxing

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 10:00 AM

Another Divorce for Trump

Liz Wolfe | 6.6.2025 9:40 AM

Texans Gain the Right To Try Individualized Medical Treatments

J.D. Tuccille | 6.6.2025 7:00 AM

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!