Ex-Libertarian Party presidential candidate George Phillies has disputed my quote from our conversation on Monday, which I blogged back here. I quoted Phillies as saying his "delegation" was majority pagan, when it's actually the Massachusetts LP committee that's majority neopagan. It's actually an important distinction. Phillies wasn't on board with the complaints he was hearing from the party; he was just passing them on.
Phillies also claims that he "most certainly did not" mention L. Neil Smith as a candidate that the party might suggest as a replacement. He's misremembering: Phillies did mention Smith, in order to make it clear he didn't like the idea.