Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Nanny State

And Don't Even Ask About Purple Nurples and Wet Willies

Radley Balko | 5.1.2008 11:24 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Via Fark comes this quote:

The police spokesman said they are ever vigilant and on the lookout for wedgies here.

"You might get away with that in Lincoln or Omaha," the spokesman said. "But we're not going to allow wedgies in North Platte."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Investigation Continues, but Here Are a Few Reckless Allegations

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

Nanny State
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (22)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Nelson Muntz   17 years ago

    HA HA

  2. Episiarch   17 years ago

    What about Texas Chili Bowls?

  3. sage   17 years ago

    And Indian sunburns?

  4. John-David   17 years ago

    The accompanying photo is the best part. I doubt there's anything similar in Getty Images.

  5. Episiarch   17 years ago

    That picture is awesome.

    Funny story: I was at a sports camp in 4th or 5th grade, and the older kids were relentless hazers. A friend and I were rushed unexpectedly one day. I managed to get away but my friend was not so lucky--and he was wearing a jock strap. From my hiding place, I watched as the older kids gave him a wedgie with the jock strap, to the point where they stretched it over his head--but behind his shoulders--and finally released it down on the front of his neck.

    I LOL'ed, but I'm sure it was very unpleasant. But it wasn't me!

  6. jtuf   17 years ago

    I've got to side with the police on this one. Wedgies are an attack on a person's body and thus violate a person's right to control his own body. Even though a wedgie is a very minor assalt, stopping them is still within the government's proper role.

    Of course, the age of the wedgie giver and response of parents can be a factor. The article just says the wedgie giver was a minor. If he was a 10 year old with responsible parents, grounding would be sufficient. If he was 17 1/2 years old or the parents encouraged the wedgies, calling the police is a reasonable response.

  7. Elemenope   17 years ago

    Of course, the age of the wedgie giver and response of parents can be a factor. The article just says the wedgie giver was a minor. If he was a 10 year old with responsible parents, grounding would be sufficient. If he was 17 1/2 years old or the parents encouraged the wedgies, calling the police is a reasonable response.

    You, sir, are far too reasonable for your own good.

  8. Warren   17 years ago

    I support capital punishment for bullies.

  9. R C Dean   17 years ago

    From my hiding place, I watched as the older kids gave him a wedgie with the jock strap, to the point where they stretched it over his head--but behind his shoulders--and finally released it down on the front of his neck.

    I believe this is known as an atomic wedgie, although I question whether it is possible to give a proper wedgie at all with a jockstrap (lacking, as they do, anything that will "wedge" in the behindular region of the wedgie-ee).

  10. Rhywun   17 years ago

    behindular

    genius

  11. good news   17 years ago

    But no one was arrested! When I saw it was a Balko posting I was afraid someone was going to a foster home or some other horrible outcome.

    Reasonable cops in North Platte, who'd a thunk?

  12. Charles   17 years ago

    And to think people don't respect the police!

  13. Episiarch   17 years ago

    RC, I believe this is a special class outside of an atomic wedgie, such as a gamma wedgie or a supertrapezial wedgie.

  14. Handsome Dan   17 years ago

    In northern Wisconsin (at least the part where I grew up) wedgies are known as grundies. That isn't really relevant to anything but, y'know, FYI.

  15. Milhouse   17 years ago

    Yeah, but what about the dreaded Rear Admiral?

  16. Taktix?   17 years ago

    I've got to side with the police on this one. Wedgies are an attack on a person's body and thus violate a person's right to control his own body. Even though a wedgie is a very minor assalt, stopping them is still within the government's proper role.

    Fair enough, but I'd argue that if North Platte cops have nothing better to do that chase down drive-by wedgies, there are too many cops being paid too much in that town.

  17. tarran   17 years ago

    Oh come on!

    They got an assault complaint. They sent a policeman over. He talked to the participants and worked out some accomodation between the warring parties.

    Nobody was arrested. Nobody was cited.

    When questioned about it, the police department spokesman mad a joke out of it.

    If you are a minarchist and think that the police should be providing security, then you should be happy because this is how the system is supposed to work.

    Anarchists like me on the other hand...

  18. Shirt   17 years ago

    I'm with Tarran (except maybe for the anarchist part.)

    The LEO showed some restraint and common sense and defused the situation with nobody getting arrested, no child taken to a foster home, and no violence.

    No doubt he'll be severely reprimanded.

  19. J sub D   17 years ago

    Fair enough, but I'd argue that if North Platte cops have nothing better to do that chase down drive-by wedgies, there are too many cops being paid too much in that town.

    C'mon Taktix?, they received a citizens complaint about an assault. They had to respond. They did, defused the situation and left. Andy Taylor would have been proud.

  20. Andy   17 years ago

    I love what the spokesman said, like the rest of the country is being overrun by an epidemic of wedgies and he's not gonna let it happen in his backyard.

  21. Paul   17 years ago

    Hoax

  22. LarryA   17 years ago

    Fair enough, but I'd argue that if North Platte cops have nothing better to do that chase down drive-by wedgies, there are too many cops being paid too much in that town.

    Mayne's principles of police work, 1829, #9:

    To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Free Movement Is Essential to a Free Society

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Too Hot to Cool Off

Charles Oliver | 7.1.2025 4:00 AM

10 of the Worst State Laws Going Into Effect in July

Autumn Billings | 6.30.2025 5:40 PM

Pennsylvania Gives Amazon Potentially Unlimited Sales Tax Exemption

Joe Lancaster | 6.30.2025 4:35 PM

No, That Viral Study Doesn't Show You Can Improve Your Mental Health by Deactivating Instagram

Jack Nicastro | 6.30.2025 4:18 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!