Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Nanny State

And Don't Even Ask About Purple Nurples and Wet Willies

Radley Balko | 5.1.2008 11:24 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Via Fark comes this quote:

The police spokesman said they are ever vigilant and on the lookout for wedgies here.

"You might get away with that in Lincoln or Omaha," the spokesman said. "But we're not going to allow wedgies in North Platte."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Investigation Continues, but Here Are a Few Reckless Allegations

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

Nanny State
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (22)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Nelson Muntz   18 years ago

    HA HA

  2. Episiarch   18 years ago

    What about Texas Chili Bowls?

  3. sage   18 years ago

    And Indian sunburns?

  4. John-David   18 years ago

    The accompanying photo is the best part. I doubt there's anything similar in Getty Images.

  5. Episiarch   18 years ago

    That picture is awesome.

    Funny story: I was at a sports camp in 4th or 5th grade, and the older kids were relentless hazers. A friend and I were rushed unexpectedly one day. I managed to get away but my friend was not so lucky--and he was wearing a jock strap. From my hiding place, I watched as the older kids gave him a wedgie with the jock strap, to the point where they stretched it over his head--but behind his shoulders--and finally released it down on the front of his neck.

    I LOL'ed, but I'm sure it was very unpleasant. But it wasn't me!

  6. jtuf   18 years ago

    I've got to side with the police on this one. Wedgies are an attack on a person's body and thus violate a person's right to control his own body. Even though a wedgie is a very minor assalt, stopping them is still within the government's proper role.

    Of course, the age of the wedgie giver and response of parents can be a factor. The article just says the wedgie giver was a minor. If he was a 10 year old with responsible parents, grounding would be sufficient. If he was 17 1/2 years old or the parents encouraged the wedgies, calling the police is a reasonable response.

  7. Elemenope   18 years ago

    Of course, the age of the wedgie giver and response of parents can be a factor. The article just says the wedgie giver was a minor. If he was a 10 year old with responsible parents, grounding would be sufficient. If he was 17 1/2 years old or the parents encouraged the wedgies, calling the police is a reasonable response.

    You, sir, are far too reasonable for your own good.

  8. Warren   18 years ago

    I support capital punishment for bullies.

  9. R C Dean   18 years ago

    From my hiding place, I watched as the older kids gave him a wedgie with the jock strap, to the point where they stretched it over his head--but behind his shoulders--and finally released it down on the front of his neck.

    I believe this is known as an atomic wedgie, although I question whether it is possible to give a proper wedgie at all with a jockstrap (lacking, as they do, anything that will "wedge" in the behindular region of the wedgie-ee).

  10. Rhywun   18 years ago

    behindular

    genius

  11. good news   18 years ago

    But no one was arrested! When I saw it was a Balko posting I was afraid someone was going to a foster home or some other horrible outcome.

    Reasonable cops in North Platte, who'd a thunk?

  12. Charles   18 years ago

    And to think people don't respect the police!

  13. Episiarch   18 years ago

    RC, I believe this is a special class outside of an atomic wedgie, such as a gamma wedgie or a supertrapezial wedgie.

  14. Handsome Dan   18 years ago

    In northern Wisconsin (at least the part where I grew up) wedgies are known as grundies. That isn't really relevant to anything but, y'know, FYI.

  15. Milhouse   18 years ago

    Yeah, but what about the dreaded Rear Admiral?

  16. Taktix?   18 years ago

    I've got to side with the police on this one. Wedgies are an attack on a person's body and thus violate a person's right to control his own body. Even though a wedgie is a very minor assalt, stopping them is still within the government's proper role.

    Fair enough, but I'd argue that if North Platte cops have nothing better to do that chase down drive-by wedgies, there are too many cops being paid too much in that town.

  17. tarran   18 years ago

    Oh come on!

    They got an assault complaint. They sent a policeman over. He talked to the participants and worked out some accomodation between the warring parties.

    Nobody was arrested. Nobody was cited.

    When questioned about it, the police department spokesman mad a joke out of it.

    If you are a minarchist and think that the police should be providing security, then you should be happy because this is how the system is supposed to work.

    Anarchists like me on the other hand...

  18. Shirt   18 years ago

    I'm with Tarran (except maybe for the anarchist part.)

    The LEO showed some restraint and common sense and defused the situation with nobody getting arrested, no child taken to a foster home, and no violence.

    No doubt he'll be severely reprimanded.

  19. J sub D   18 years ago

    Fair enough, but I'd argue that if North Platte cops have nothing better to do that chase down drive-by wedgies, there are too many cops being paid too much in that town.

    C'mon Taktix?, they received a citizens complaint about an assault. They had to respond. They did, defused the situation and left. Andy Taylor would have been proud.

  20. Andy   18 years ago

    I love what the spokesman said, like the rest of the country is being overrun by an epidemic of wedgies and he's not gonna let it happen in his backyard.

  21. Paul   18 years ago

    Hoax

  22. LarryA   18 years ago

    Fair enough, but I'd argue that if North Platte cops have nothing better to do that chase down drive-by wedgies, there are too many cops being paid too much in that town.

    Mayne's principles of police work, 1829, #9:

    To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Americans Need More and Better 'Third Places.' User Fees Can Help.

C. Jarrett Dieterle and Shawn Regan | 12.13.2025 7:00 AM

Nepal's Socialist Government Banned Social Media, So Activists Plotted a Revolution—on Discord.

Matthew Petti | From the January 2026 issue

The Feds' 'Worst of the Worst' Database Is Stuffed with Nonviolent Offenders. Who Exactly Is ICE Arresting?

Autumn Billings | 12.12.2025 6:00 PM

Donald Trump Tries To Override State AI Regulations via Executive Order

Jack Nicastro | 12.12.2025 5:38 PM

2 Grand Juries Have Rejected the Grudge-Driven Case Against Trump Foe Letitia James

Jacob Sullum | 12.12.2025 4:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks