Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

More Rove

David Weigel | 8.13.2007 10:18 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's amusing, the way Karl Rove decided to go out via an interview with Paul Gigot. The WSJ's editorial page editor makes like a Transformer and morphs into a funnel for Rove's thick, brown gallons of horse crap.

[E]ven with a unified Democratic Party and the war, he argues, [2006] was "a really close election." The GOP lost the Senate by its 3,562 vote margin of defeat in Montana, and in the House the combined margin in the 15 seats that cost control was 85,000 votes.

Actually, it was lucky for Bush that the dozen or so races Republicans barely won didn't go the other way. The swing against Republicans was massive, as best shown by Democrats who ran rematch races against Republicans. In 2004 Nancy Boyda ran for a seat from Kansas and lost by 15 points to Republican Jim Ryun. In 2006 she won by four points—a nineteen point swing. New Hampshire Democrat Paul Hodes lost to Charles Bass by 20 points in 2004 and won by seven in 2006. This was a party coming back from big structural disadvantages and clobbering a well-oiled political machine. Rove's argument is loser talk, and not even convincing loser talk.

What about that new GOP William McKinley-style majority he hoped to build--isn't that now in tatters, as the country tilts leftward on security, economics and the culture? Again, Mr. Rove disagrees. He says young people are if anything more pro-life and free-market than older Americans, and that, despite the difficulties in Iraq, the country doesn't want to be defeated there or in the fight against Islamic terror.

But none of that is Rove's doing. The point of his attended re-alignment was to grab young voters on these points of agreement and pull them into the GOP. The opposite has happened: In some polls, young voters are more pro-war than they are pro-Republican. Social Security privatization was more popular with young voters before Bush took his spin on the Wheel o' Incompetence. That brilliant 2004 embrace of gay marriage bans? Dynamite for locking down older voters, and nearly as effective at making the young disgusted with the GOP.

Oh, and this is a fun Gigot question:

And what about Jeb Bush in 2012?

Rove, sadly, decides to pass on helping the most blundering political dynasty since the Duvaliers ooze back into the White House.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Tom Tancredo, Feminist

David Weigel is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (24)

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!