Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

More Rove

David Weigel | 8.13.2007 10:18 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's amusing, the way Karl Rove decided to go out via an interview with Paul Gigot. The WSJ's editorial page editor makes like a Transformer and morphs into a funnel for Rove's thick, brown gallons of horse crap.

[E]ven with a unified Democratic Party and the war, he argues, [2006] was "a really close election." The GOP lost the Senate by its 3,562 vote margin of defeat in Montana, and in the House the combined margin in the 15 seats that cost control was 85,000 votes.

Actually, it was lucky for Bush that the dozen or so races Republicans barely won didn't go the other way. The swing against Republicans was massive, as best shown by Democrats who ran rematch races against Republicans. In 2004 Nancy Boyda ran for a seat from Kansas and lost by 15 points to Republican Jim Ryun. In 2006 she won by four points—a nineteen point swing. New Hampshire Democrat Paul Hodes lost to Charles Bass by 20 points in 2004 and won by seven in 2006. This was a party coming back from big structural disadvantages and clobbering a well-oiled political machine. Rove's argument is loser talk, and not even convincing loser talk.

What about that new GOP William McKinley-style majority he hoped to build--isn't that now in tatters, as the country tilts leftward on security, economics and the culture? Again, Mr. Rove disagrees. He says young people are if anything more pro-life and free-market than older Americans, and that, despite the difficulties in Iraq, the country doesn't want to be defeated there or in the fight against Islamic terror.

But none of that is Rove's doing. The point of his attended re-alignment was to grab young voters on these points of agreement and pull them into the GOP. The opposite has happened: In some polls, young voters are more pro-war than they are pro-Republican. Social Security privatization was more popular with young voters before Bush took his spin on the Wheel o' Incompetence. That brilliant 2004 embrace of gay marriage bans? Dynamite for locking down older voters, and nearly as effective at making the young disgusted with the GOP.

Oh, and this is a fun Gigot question:

And what about Jeb Bush in 2012?

Rove, sadly, decides to pass on helping the most blundering political dynasty since the Duvaliers ooze back into the White House.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Tom Tancredo, Feminist

David Weigel is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (24)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pro Libertate   18 years ago

    Actually, Jeb Bush (sans l'affaire Schiavo) was a good governor and would certainly have been ten times better than his weak brother in the White House. However, whether I like him better than George is irrelevant now--no more Bushes. Or Clintons. Or anyone else who even has the same last name as the last, oh, fifteen presidents.

  2. Cesar   18 years ago

    And what about Jeb Bush in 2012?

    Kill me now.

  3. VikingMoose   18 years ago

    And there we have it, gentle readers.

    You have read it hier first.

    ProGLib has sworn off BUSH. No more bush for him.

    We have dispatched the roving (ha!) reporter to find out from the various Libertatian Constituencies what the potential fall out will be.

    Stay tuned!

  4. Cesar   18 years ago

    no more Bushes. Or Clintons. Or anyone else who even has the same last name as the last, oh, fifteen presidents.

    Who here favors a constitutional amendment to ban any child, spouse, sibling, parent, or first cousin of a former president from serving for at least 25 years since he left office? *raises hand*

  5. Pro Libertate   18 years ago

    Cesar,

    Are you advocating some sort of kin limits?

  6. Stephen The Goldberger   18 years ago

    Tonya Harding 08

  7. thoreau   18 years ago

    Tonya Harding? Nonsense! I'm casting my vote for DONDEROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

  8. Cesar   18 years ago

    Are you advocating some sort of kin limits?

    Yes, yes I am. We don't need an elective monarchy in this country.

  9. Pro Libertate   18 years ago

    Term limits and kin limits. I'm in.

  10. zevatron   18 years ago

    After Hillary, we get Jeb. After Jeb, we get Chelsea. After Chelsea, one of the Bush twins. After...

  11. rho   18 years ago

    After Hillary, we get Jeb. After Jeb, we get Chelsea. After Chelsea, one of the Bush twins. After...

    That's just... disgusting. I just got the piss shivers.

  12. iowan   18 years ago

    After Hillary, we get Jeb. After Jeb, we get Chelsea. After Chelsea, one of the Bush twins. After...,/i>

    No, not the bush twins, it will be Jeb's son, the strikingly handsome, half-latino young man that is as smooth in his twenties as any professional pol you'll ever see.

  13. iowan   18 years ago

    oops on the italics

    No, not the bush twins, it will be Jeb's son, the strikingly handsome, half-latino young man that is as smooth in his twenties as any professional pol you'll ever see

  14. Chuck   18 years ago

    PL--

    Gotta disagree with you on Jeb. We've had worse governors, but I would only rate his performance as "good" in disaster response. The damage that Jeb did to the state university system will take many years to repair, he ran and hid while legislative leaders waged open warfare on each other (remember Johnnie Byrd vs Jim King?), and his management style showed an arrogance and intolerance for dissenting views that make brother George look like Gandhi by comparison.
    Talk about your unitary executive...W probably copied the idea from Jeb.
    His "outsourcing" of state government functions followed the Russian model, and now millions more are going to have to be spent to clean up the messes his no-bid contractors created and then walked away from.

    I can't imagine Jeb as POTUS.

  15. Taktix?   18 years ago

    Plus, just from a diplomatic standpoint, how can expect any level of respect from foreign countries with a POTUS named "Jeb."

  16. Taktix?   18 years ago

    ...how can WE expect...

  17. GILMORE   18 years ago

    He says young people are if anything more pro-life and free-market than older Americans

    Not according to 10 years of opinion research ive done. I'd like to see some kind of data behind this.

    younger people are more pro choice, open minded about gays, and less 'free market' than older americans... doesnt take a lot of poking around to find evidence of it.

  18. TrickyVic   18 years ago

    I find it funny that the guy who says we need to stay in Iraq till the job, is done is quitting the White House before the job is done.

  19. Syd   18 years ago

    Rove, sadly, decides to pass on helping the most blundering political dynasty since the Duvaliers ooze back into the White House.

    Worse than the Kims in North Korea?

  20. Cesar   18 years ago

    If we have another Bush or Clinton after Hillary, I've had it with this country.

  21. Matthew   18 years ago

    TrickyVic

    I suspect he may have been "asked" to leave.

  22. The DailyVid   18 years ago

    From the interview:
    And what about Jeb Bush in 2012? Mr. Rove first says with a tone of skepticism, "Ask Jeb." Then he adds, "You better get a younger man. My wife would kill me."

    From Weigel:
    Rove, sadly, decides to pass on helping the most blundering political dynasty since the Duvaliers ooze back into the White House.

    Not exactly the same...

  23. Cesar   18 years ago

    William McKinley-style majority

    Well, he does share one thing with my very distant relative. They both got the US bogged down in foreign insurgencies for dubious reasons.

  24. jh   18 years ago

    ProGLib has sworn off BUSH. No more bush for him.

    Ummm, I think he was swearing off "voting for anyone with the last name of Bush". NOT at all the same thing as "swearing off bush.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Wants Harvard To Hand Over Info on Over 10,000 International Students

Autumn Billings | 7.10.2025 5:18 PM

The People Who Wrecked N.Y. Schools Love Zohran Mamdani

Matt Welch | 7.10.2025 5:03 PM

The Department of Homeland Security Says Trump's Immigration Enforcers Are on a Mission From God

Jacob Sullum | 7.10.2025 3:15 PM

Trump's 50 Percent Copper Tariff Will Drive Up Prices for Tech, Homes, Military Equipment, and More

Eric Boehm | 7.10.2025 2:30 PM

Did the Secret Service Surveil James Comey Without a Warrant After '86 47' Post?

Joe Lancaster | 7.10.2025 2:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!